S
Scottster
Guest
I was watching the you tube Stalev vs Kiamco match and Danny D. made a comment on how "the dampness creates LESS FRICTION which makes it tougher to draw the ball."
I was always told that the dampness creates MORE FRICTION, therefore the it takes a greater stroke to apply enough draw to the cueball so the backspin will combat the added friction to have enough spin to draw back after contacting the OB.
If it added less friction than a wet table would bank long, rather than short. Surely he was just confused in his explanation right?
I was always told that the dampness creates MORE FRICTION, therefore the it takes a greater stroke to apply enough draw to the cueball so the backspin will combat the added friction to have enough spin to draw back after contacting the OB.
If it added less friction than a wet table would bank long, rather than short. Surely he was just confused in his explanation right?