I just lost 150-0

CB hitting the rail on the break is required only if there is no called ball pocketed:

4.3 Opening Break Shot
The following rules apply to the opening break shot:
(a) The cue ball begins in hand behind the head string.
(b) If no called ball is pocketed, the cue ball and two object balls must each be driven to a rail or the shot is a breaking foul.
 
If the cue ball didn't hit a rail it would of been a foul. Opening break has to have two object balls and cue ball contact a rail. Would of been a two point penalty and you could of had him re-break.

Only Chris, Lipsky and Barouty would of thought of this after the ball was pocketed. :smile:

Not true. He legally pocketed a called shot. Nothing had to hit a rail.


Your first mistake... He wins the lag, you break:cool:...

The player winning the lag has the choice to break or give the break to his opponent. In this case he saw a dead combo in a slug rack and took advantage by calling a shot on the opening break. If our boy made a mistake it was by not inspecting the rack before his opponent broke. :grin:
 
Why humiliating? That's one of the easier losses to take, you did nothing wrong. He played perfect pool.

Well, to have that opening break shot played against him means that the shooter has no respect for the OP's game. I don't know of any player who would shoot a ball from a loose rack against an opponent he thought might win. If the corner ball were a high percentage from a full rack, the game of one pocket would change quite a bit.

The other possibility is that the champ had already played some on that table and knew that corner ball racked dead if the balls were in their craters.
 
You can still get a tight rack with a plastic rack. You may have to work at it a bit. I've only seen this happen a few times where someone would elect to break after winning the lag. Never anyone capable of running over 100 from the break, either. Most people I've seen do this take fliers. How many are you capable of running if you got the chance and did he know your speed?
 
You can still get a tight rack with a plastic rack. You may have to work at it a bit.

The plastic triangles in my club are of the thin, easily bendable kind, and they've seen better days. They seem permanently warped, to the point that the two balls behind the apex can be 5mm apart. So whenever possible, I rack the balls by hand, but then I have another problem: half of the tables have really beat-up felts with holes in them, and the other half have brand new cloths on which the balls don't seem to have bedded in yet, so whichever table I choose, the balls won't stay put. As for hammering them in, the club owner doesn't allow it on the new felts.

Most players in the club aren't good enough for the bad racks to matter much, so we just play with the racks as good as they're willing to be.

I've only seen this happen a few times where someone would elect to break after winning the lag. Never anyone capable of running over 100 from the break, either. Most people I've seen do this take fliers. How many are you capable of running if you got the chance and did he know your speed?

His two break shots were successful, but the balls he called didn't exactly go straight in. The first time, I thought it was sheer luck, but after the 3rd rack, I figured he must have known what he was doing, because I assume no-one who can play like this would break racks recklessly.

As for my own abilities, on good days, I can run a couple of racks. But most of the time, I'm not too shabby at safety shots, so my runs aren't usually long or impressive and I usually win by grinding (when I win). Also, I am a slow player, so I tend to wear my adversaries out.

I never met the guy before, but he might have seen me play 8-ball with a friend while he was hanging around at the bar before inviting me to play.
 
150-0?

Just thought you might like this story;

Joe Procita and Ralph Greenleaf were to shoot together in a few exhibitions matches, on a 5 X 10 table.

The first game started by Greenleaf winning the lag and having Procita break. From the break, there were a couple loose balls and Greenleaf ran 125 out.

The second game started much like the first game, in which Greenleaf wins the lag and Procita has to break. Again, after the break, there were a couple loose balls and Greenleaf runs 125 out.

So, the third game starts, and, as you may have guessed, Greenleaf wins the lag and Procita has to break. Needless to say, after leaving a couple loose balls from the break, Greenleaf runs 125 out.

375 balls on a 5 X 10 without a miss!

I guess Procita needed to work on his break.
 
Reminds me of Allen Keele

Allen would do things like that dead drunk or hung over the whole whlie. He did it Grady years back. I don't think he ever figured it out!
Nick :)
 
Played some guy from the honor league tonight at our local pool hall. The game went like this:

- He wins the lag, I sit down

- He looks at the rack for a minute (racks are never really tight in our club because they only provide crummy plastic triangles), calls 6 in the corner, breaks the entire rack like a madman, pockets the 6. First wow moment.

- He runs 104 points without flinching. Second wow moment. I re-rack (again, at least I have something to do), he plays a safety on the key ball and leaves me with nothing to pocket.

- I graze a rack ball by a hair and leave a perfect safety.

- He looks at the slightly disturbed rack again, calls 8 in the side, rams the rack like a freight train, pockets the 8. Third wow moment.

- He runs to 150 while all the members of the club were trying to lift their lower jaws from the floor.

Damn that was humiliating. Still, what a fascinating affair to watch: I never saw that in real-life, it's much better than TV, so in a sense I had the best seat in the room to enjoy the action and I'm glad I came to get my ass whooped.

Thanks for sharing the story,

I think thats the best possible way to lose-not humilating at all. you didnt make any mistake except losing the lag. You had the best seat in the house as you said. It sucks to lose, but dont be humilated, at least your playing with top players.

best eric
 
I don't mind losing 150-0. If someone is beating me 150-0, they played lights-out. I've lost 100-0 a few times. Each time, I watched someone play perfectly and it was actually quite enjoyable to sweat.

14.1, when played at that level, is one of the most beautiful things to watch.

It looks easy at that level, the easier it looks the stronger the player.

My high run in one pocket is higher than my hi-run playing 14.1:sorry::sorry::sorry: I am the weakest 14.1 player in the history of pool. I sure do admire the guys who can play it good, like Danny H, JS, Hopkins, Miz etc. It amazes me how they do it,
 
Straight

Similar story;
When I was 16 I had been playing straight pool for a few years and my dad took me to get my first cue. We went to Leo Galli's house. Now Leo was a cuemaker and a former Pennsylvania Straight Pool Champion - but I knew none of this at the time.

Leo offered to play a little straight pool with me to try out one of his cues to see if I liked it. In a game to 125 I got out to a 20-15 lead and thought I was the cat's ass - until my next miss. As I sat down Leo asked me if I was done. I said yeah, I just missed. He said, no, are you done? He proceeded to run 110 and out. At the time it was light years ahead of anything my 16 year old eyes had ever seen. I'll never forget it and wish Leo was still around.

Ron F
 
Back
Top