JB Cases said:Again we don't know all the circumstances. We don't really know what exactly the WPA/APBU was approached with or confronted with before the tournament began.
Apparently Ian Andersen appealed to the missing players and extended an invitation. However Ian Andersen and the WPA cannot force Yen Makebenta to resign.
I suppose that they could put pressure on the APBU to disenfranchise the BSCP but they might have felt that they were not in a position to take sides on the matter.
So should Ian Andersen withdraw the sanction for the tournament? Why should he do that if the BSCP and Raya are both in good standing with the WPA?
The only way to solve this is to get all parties to the table and hash it out. OR for the disgruntled group to do their own thing and force the other parties out of business.
Right now hindsight is all we have. So from here the players have stuck to their principles and proven that they will boycott BSCP events. I think it was pretty clear what the absence of those players did to the moral and financial draw of the tournament. So now it's up to all parties to renegotiate and see if resolution can be found. If not then let the group who is able to produce a better show win.
John
John, 100% with you in your last sentence. When groups get into competition, there will be more opportunity for the players. But there should be a fair playing field, so that eventually, the players and managers of BMPAP and the players of BSCP/Raya will see nothing wrong with joining ANY tournament in the country. After all, everybody stands a chance to win money -- be it a player or a manager.
And it is true that right now, all we have is hindsight IF we choose to. Before the tournament, we had both foresight and still hindsight because a trend was established. We saw the success and failures of local tournaments from the different camps. The effects of a boycott was already seen in tournaments months prior to WTB. Some people had foresight. Until now though, even in hindsight, some people are still in denial.