ipt sigel vs schmidt proved what
- Thread starter wrldpro
- Start date
hi
First of all I've already played you twice.Second I don't want to play you anything, but I will.Its kind of a no win situation .EitherI lose the money or i win the money and then you come on here and tell about savors ,bad mouth me ,threaten me physically and basically act like a guy who never wants to get played by anyone ever again.
like i said if you want to play the same way again i will even though i dont want to deal with you anymore than necessary.
you were fair with me and gave me a rematch so i will give you another chance at me.
thats the best i can do.peace out
First of all I've already played you twice.Second I don't want to play you anything, but I will.Its kind of a no win situation .EitherI lose the money or i win the money and then you come on here and tell about savors ,bad mouth me ,threaten me physically and basically act like a guy who never wants to get played by anyone ever again.
like i said if you want to play the same way again i will even though i dont want to deal with you anymore than necessary.
you were fair with me and gave me a rematch so i will give you another chance at me.
thats the best i can do.peace out
So in other words your scared to play me a big set of One Pocket right.? The feeling is mutual Mr Shmidtty, I hope you tell everyone how u came and saw and kicked but - my hat's off to ya. I heard Jack Cooney taught you how to play One Pocket, well I never had any great players teach me. I also never got invited to the private parties and such ie IPT and that's the way I like it - u see I like to earn my spot and the only way I will play U anymore is a game that I know I can have fun in. Playing U One Pocket will take my mind off of how much WE don't like each other, there will be a ref. so if u feel the need to argue then u can talk to the ref. If you are scared than just say so, it's OK to be scared John boy cause u will have to earn it if you beat me heads up 'playin' One Hole. No need to respond if u don't want to take a shot at winning big $ playing me One Pocket and One Pocket only.
I Approve This Message.
I Approve This Message.
Last edited:
This is just my opinion, but I think Danny, you should just give it a rest. The more you come on here, the worse you sound. Just let bye-gones be bye-gones. (I think that is the right spelling.) I like you and I love your game but this internet woofing is just not for you. Take the high road and let it go.
Well you yall do not know the story with John and I, it's not my place to make enemies but I don't think I can tarnish my rep any worse. I have read some of your posts in the past there enzo and whatever, I just thought John was wussing out by saying he has nothing to prove, he proved alot to me with his attitude the last time we played besides the fact that he's a good player. I have never had much of a fan club and really it makes no difference to me, so if you want me to give it a rest then someone step up to the plate. All I am asking is for anyone to come to MO and play some One Pocket, I will play anyone they bring sets for a minimum of $500 and depending on who you are I will bet more. Who ever says they won't come cause they do not like me or have heard this and that in the gossip column then good luck on ever becoming a player cause you have allready got an excuse to lose. Again for anyone who thinks it's a joke yes you will have to earn the $, so this offer is open to anyone who likes matching up in one pocket that is not a nit. If I lose then I will shake your hand and live to play another day, even if I win and you bump into my cue and act totally disrespectfull then I will not invite you back. I DO treat people the way I would expect to be treated and so that is that, also I don't think John is the better player between us - I do think he is the better aggitator.
You guys really should get it together and play a Harriman vs. Schmidt Part III. I know you are wanting to play 1-pocket only, Danny, but each of you have won one set of each game played. Your performance in the last 14.1 match was great (for those of you who aren't aware, Danny had 3 runs of over 100 balls).
Anyway, after all of this stuff online, in addition to the competitiveness of the first two events, I would have to think that that this match-up would be in the running for TAR's most watched event to date.
I know it's easy for me to sit here and talk about this when I'm not putting up any money but, I'm just saying, if you guys are able to get the money together, and agree on the location/rules/etc., you might have the Thrilla in Manilla of pool here.
Anyway, after all of this stuff online, in addition to the competitiveness of the first two events, I would have to think that that this match-up would be in the running for TAR's most watched event to date.
I know it's easy for me to sit here and talk about this when I'm not putting up any money but, I'm just saying, if you guys are able to get the money together, and agree on the location/rules/etc., you might have the Thrilla in Manilla of pool here.
Danny Harriman said:
no hard feelings danny, i just didn't think you were handling yourself well before.
if you want to play im sure john will oblige, it may not be as soon as youd like but im sure you two will get another session going.
and, my opinion may mean squat to you but when you say he is the better agitator, well, im not accusing john of anything but he obviously did something that got to you, at least according to your statements. after losing im not sure the "he beat me because he's a scumbag that got into my head" attitude is correct. there was most likely a BIG ball or two that you missed that you should be harping on instead, that is, get mad at yourself for the mistakes you made and realize this is why you lost. that is just my opinion of course and i have stated i didnt see the incident so take it with a grain of salt.
ill gladly play you one hole sometime just not right now.you outbank me bigtime and still after 38 games we are even. from what i see i outthink you outexecute you i just dont bank with you therefore we play about even.Danny Harriman said:
you are great player but you are really tough to deal with .i think it would have been better if i lost.
then you would be acting like my best friend.
you seriously are one of the worst losers ive ever dealt with.
you have a chip on your shoulder for many reasons that are obvious to me.
i hope someday you grow up but i dont think thats going to happen anytime soon.
by the way do you have enough heart to play me in a place that i pick all around for 10-20 large.if you do im easy to get ahold of.
otherwise get a life please and find somebody new to hate.
I just think that you once again are great at dodging the question John, I am not making excuses for losing but I do feel you were out of line. So what you showed me that you do not like me, that is why you banged into my cue and did not say excuse me. I do not hate anyone but YOU are someone I would like to play heads up One Pocket against for big $. Forget all these other games One Pocket is the best game, I don't like to lose but also am not one to take it personal - unless my opponent acts unsportsman like.
You said I am not much bigger than my cue and you probably out weigh me by 20 or 30 pounds, I know a gym where we can suit up and they will tape our wrists and suit us up with padded gloves. That way it would be professional and knowone would get too hurt, remember john the guy that you like to call a little ***** is offering you 2 to 1 in any boxing ring. No full contact just plain old boxing with an official. You whip me and and I will give $5,000, if I win then you owe $2,500, I would really like to see if your bark has any bite. The Action Report can be invoved, win or lose I will then play the all around again - but only after our boxing match.
Other than that I will only play you One Pocket cause I do think I have a little of the best of it, if I play just a bit better than I have. I did nothing to provoke you calling me a ***** on the phone "I heard you ran 280 congrats don't beat my 400 *****." This is what started the bad feelings between you and I - and even though you said you were just joking I did not find it comical in the least bit. I see why you could not make it on the golf tour or in marriage, it's cause of your attitude - throwing chalk, argumentativeness, and poor sportsmanship.
You said I am not much bigger than my cue and you probably out weigh me by 20 or 30 pounds, I know a gym where we can suit up and they will tape our wrists and suit us up with padded gloves. That way it would be professional and knowone would get too hurt, remember john the guy that you like to call a little ***** is offering you 2 to 1 in any boxing ring. No full contact just plain old boxing with an official. You whip me and and I will give $5,000, if I win then you owe $2,500, I would really like to see if your bark has any bite. The Action Report can be invoved, win or lose I will then play the all around again - but only after our boxing match.
Other than that I will only play you One Pocket cause I do think I have a little of the best of it, if I play just a bit better than I have. I did nothing to provoke you calling me a ***** on the phone "I heard you ran 280 congrats don't beat my 400 *****." This is what started the bad feelings between you and I - and even though you said you were just joking I did not find it comical in the least bit. I see why you could not make it on the golf tour or in marriage, it's cause of your attitude - throwing chalk, argumentativeness, and poor sportsmanship.
Last edited:
Not the words of a Christian, Danny. Jesus didn't die for you so you could go off on John on AZB.Danny Harriman said:
WWJD?
Seriously. You're starting to sound like a 6 year old girl. Enough. Of course you want to gamble against John in his weakest game. First, you lipped and said you'd only gamble against him in 10-ball. Now it's 1P. Now it's boxing. How about you bet $20K who's the biggest whiner/stalker. That one's a lock for you.
GIVE IT UP. You won one. He won one. If you want to get back in the ring, All-around #3. REAL SIMPLE. If you're a lock at 1P, like you say, it should be easy money to split 10ball or 14.1.
Danny Harriman said:
the whole thing about the marriage is just way out of line. prudent people (to be euphemistic) don't really conduct themselves that way in a public forum danny. and the fighting stuff, you realize you both make money playing pool. right, ie with your hands?? anyway, to be honest, who am i to judge. but he said he'll play so why not just leave it at that..... just gear up for it, if you spend too much time in this forum you'll get out of stroke
Mr. Harriman,
I've been following this thread since its inception and havent added to it until now. All I can say is WOW, bringing someones marriage up in a personal feud on a public forum is completely unacceptable. I have nothing but admiration and respect for your game, as I truly think you're an amazing all around player. Unfortunately you have just tarnished your image drastically in my opinion with that statement. This maybe a personal conflict between you and Mr. Schmidt, but in the end its still about pool and money. Stick with the topics and dont degrade yourself in public like this.
I've been following this thread since its inception and havent added to it until now. All I can say is WOW, bringing someones marriage up in a personal feud on a public forum is completely unacceptable. I have nothing but admiration and respect for your game, as I truly think you're an amazing all around player. Unfortunately you have just tarnished your image drastically in my opinion with that statement. This maybe a personal conflict between you and Mr. Schmidt, but in the end its still about pool and money. Stick with the topics and dont degrade yourself in public like this.
Well Justin, I just thought that John was in the wrong to bring up the fact that I do not have any sponsors, I did want to play in the World Championships and John's comment reminded me that even though I have the $ to go I would have to win the tournament to cash after expenses. Justin you admire my game but it's a shame that there are no referee's during the TAR matches. There has to be a ref especially when you have an opponent that does not like the other, the bottom line in pool is if there are no referee's then the promoter in charge enjoys the drama of watching two players argue and this makes for low professionalism.
I realize that TAr is a new idea and I still have much respect for what yall are trying to do, ya I was wrong to bring up John's personal skeletons but he went there first ('talkin bout' me not having any sponsors.) There was nothing wrong with my attitude when John and I played however in our 2nd match there was something wrong with his. It's funny to me that you just let us argue about the rules when you knew John was just trying to get under my skin. Everyone sit there like a dear in the spotlight and watched as as the argument continued, since you knew the rules I figured someone would step up and remind John about the rules. I also lost some respect for the action report when this happened - again I don't blame anyone but if I ever play in another challenge match there will be a ref or I simply won't play. Which is fine with alot of folk and the feeling from me is mutual, also it will be interesting watch the next DVD to see if John rushing into me and banging my cue even shows up being he has so many big wig sponsors and such. John was the one who acted inappropriately in our last match not me, the people at home deserve to know why I did not shake his hand. So he comes on hear and gets personal about me not having any sponsorship? That is the first time I have played and never shook a players hand, John smiled his smug grin when I turned down the hand shake cause he knew that he got to me.
I wish the TAr the best of luck even if they don't want to ever have me back, but John if you read this u and I both know the reason I do not have sponsors (I know I'm high risk) that was a mean thing to say. John Schmidt you are a great player but you went below the belt cause we both know the main reason for me not having a sponsorship other than backers, you will receive bad karma for that pal. If we would have had ref's like we were supposed to then John and I would have never started bad mouthing each other like spoiled kids on this forum in the first place. Also I am a Christian but when John called me a little ***** (female dog) cause I did not want to change the rules at 9-9, those will allway's be fighting words to me and I will stand up for myself no matter how bad it makes me look. This is my last post about this as I'm stepping on toes that I would rather not, my toes are still tappin and I am not in jail plus I really don't want to be a badass to people who have helped me, I'm honored to have been apart of what Justin and Chad have done with the Action Report.
I realize that TAr is a new idea and I still have much respect for what yall are trying to do, ya I was wrong to bring up John's personal skeletons but he went there first ('talkin bout' me not having any sponsors.) There was nothing wrong with my attitude when John and I played however in our 2nd match there was something wrong with his. It's funny to me that you just let us argue about the rules when you knew John was just trying to get under my skin. Everyone sit there like a dear in the spotlight and watched as as the argument continued, since you knew the rules I figured someone would step up and remind John about the rules. I also lost some respect for the action report when this happened - again I don't blame anyone but if I ever play in another challenge match there will be a ref or I simply won't play. Which is fine with alot of folk and the feeling from me is mutual, also it will be interesting watch the next DVD to see if John rushing into me and banging my cue even shows up being he has so many big wig sponsors and such. John was the one who acted inappropriately in our last match not me, the people at home deserve to know why I did not shake his hand. So he comes on hear and gets personal about me not having any sponsorship? That is the first time I have played and never shook a players hand, John smiled his smug grin when I turned down the hand shake cause he knew that he got to me.
I wish the TAr the best of luck even if they don't want to ever have me back, but John if you read this u and I both know the reason I do not have sponsors (I know I'm high risk) that was a mean thing to say. John Schmidt you are a great player but you went below the belt cause we both know the main reason for me not having a sponsorship other than backers, you will receive bad karma for that pal. If we would have had ref's like we were supposed to then John and I would have never started bad mouthing each other like spoiled kids on this forum in the first place. Also I am a Christian but when John called me a little ***** (female dog) cause I did not want to change the rules at 9-9, those will allway's be fighting words to me and I will stand up for myself no matter how bad it makes me look. This is my last post about this as I'm stepping on toes that I would rather not, my toes are still tappin and I am not in jail plus I really don't want to be a badass to people who have helped me, I'm honored to have been apart of what Justin and Chad have done with the Action Report.
Last edited: