Been a couple of days since I paid attention. Catching up now and I can't wrap my head around the opinions that the idea of playing on more difficult equipment won't making your overall game better. I just don't understand the logic. Are those in this thread who claim this, not actually tried it..?
The whole reason I reconditioned my home table in the first place was because of the buckets it originally had. I had grown so accustomed to it's slop that when covid finally blew over, I played like utter crap at my local room. The frustration was so high that I literally took a knife to my cloth after league to force the rework...lol. Fast forward a year or so, and the 4.25 pockets at home have made my average play on point nearly all the time. The only situation where it hasn't notably helped me is when I travel to rooms with tightly cut diamonds. Where I struggle with the accuracy they require. Notice a trend...? If my table had the slate of a diamond and subsequent shelf depth. I'm sure I'd be playing lights out there. Why..? Because the zones in which you need to hit the pocket to drop balls becomes muscle memory and not a conscious adjustment as it it is now.
Maybe this is one of those conversations on AZB wherein the level of the players speaking their opinions needs to be considered.
All that said.... The OP wants to become a 700 player. That's a level of commitment to performing your best day in day out and various locations. Growing accustomed to slop at home will not get him there, period. You would either need incredible command on your game to switch up to random conditions, or sculpt your game into some more universal. There is zero downside to having the ability to pot and control the CB on tight equipment, when you have the opportunity to play on something looser. The same can't be said going the other way.