bobroberts wasn't distorting anything. He just based his questioning in a rhetorical manner.
The guy's a troll, he didn't like it when everyone didn't jump on his bandwagon so he has to keep going and going. It's amazing how he avoided that other guy's questions altogether which are very valid.
The guy's a troll, he didn't like it when everyone didn't jump on his bandwagon so he has to keep going and going. It's amazing how he avoided that other guy's questions altogether which are very valid.
buddha162 said:No, that's not what I'm implying.
If someone said, "I disagree with VH for this this and that reason," you would've expressed an opinion. But bobroberts said, "VH said this this and that and I think it's retarded," when VH said no such thing.
There's a difference between voicing a dissenting opinion (which is welcome as long as it makes some logical sense), and what bobroberts did (distortion). You merely called VH a troll, which I consider a baseless accusation, but that's just my opinion =)
-Roger
Last edited: