LOL! That's possible Don, but I'd love to think it's not the real reason. Especially as he's just banked $ 150,000.00 after his win over Loree Jon Jones last month.
BS.
BS.
Blue_Suede said:LOL! That's possible Don, but I'd love to think it's not the real reason. Especially as he's just banked $ 150,000.00 after his win over Loree Jon Jones last month.
BS.
That's because of all those damn fancy meals you cook up Purdy!Donald A. Purdy said:Last time I checked, $150,000 would keep me in the game of life for about 1.5 years. After taxes maybe 1 year.
Don![]()
Rude Dog said:That's because of all those damn fancy meals you cook up Purdy!![]()
Rude Dog said:I'm not sure if anyone has the answer to that. But, King Of The Hill, means, the king of the hill, and someone has to knock him off. He's the MAN! It could have been L.J.J. too, I think people are forgetting that she had the chance to be there just like Mike. I think it's a helluva gimmick, Mike's paid his dues, why not him? Peace, John.
Blue_Suede said:Aye, but Mike's not putting up the money (or the challenge).
That's my point. Why not make the 'King of the Hill' the guy who wins the event out of ALL the players? And why doesn't Mike take his place in the round robin along with the others?
Mike Segal IS a great player. But so are the rest. He was fortunate to be picked out by the IPT to play in the inaugraul event against Loree Jon Jones (?) which he won, but don't you think that many of the others would also have done as well?
Please don't missunderstand me. I'm hugely in favor of the IPT, but although I don't want to complain about the event, I think it's only fair to question some of the formats.
BS
Blue_Suede said:I don't think that anyone has an axe to grind against Mike Segal. If any pool player deserves a credit such as this then he's got to be high on the list for services rendered.
But, and you'll have to keep me right on this one, why would there not be an IPT tournament without him?
This is a question BTW (I don't know the answer). Does Mike have an involvement with the IPT?
BS
SlimShafty said:Kevin was a pool player long before he had any intentions of creating a tour, he always wanted to have the best teacher give him lessons with pool. Mike offers private lessons and Kevin called to hire him as a private teacher, they became good friends and with Kevins love for the game and mikes knowledge and love for the game the idea was thrown around for a while.
Mike had ideas as I'm sure Kevin did but if you have ever talked to Mike he has always thought pool could be better promoted and more like golf and the whole IPT system is going to be similar to golf in many ways. I feel almost 100% sure that if the meeting between Mike and Kevin never happened, the IPT would not have started.
Blue_Suede said:Good answer Slim.
Didn't know that, but I did have a suspicion that Mike maybe did have something to do with the IPT. I couldn't say anything 'cos I didn't know for sure, but what you've said does seem to clear some things up.
That being the case, all I can say is 'Good Luck' to all (and eat some humble pie on my part) hmmm.... pie......
Siht!!!! Should've known better!
So? Who do you think may become 'King of the Hill'?
BS
Eieio59 said:JAM...... YOU ROCK!I sometimes feel the need to get on here and post, but usually..... you say what I feel, so I don't have to!
![]()
IPT, regardless of how it is rated 10 years from now, is the CURRENT hope for a lot of players. We, who love the game, want to play the game, and who have supported it for years will get to experience what may possibly be the single biggest revolution that pool has ever undergone. I'm proud to be included, along with Keith and all of the rest of those chosen..... my only regret is that it is limited in any way to certain players. The growing begins and before soon, all players will have an opportunity to participate! In the end, everyone will have this chance.
You know the ole "going out on a limb" idea applies here..... except in the past haven't we (poolplayers) gone out on limb's that weren't even close to being this strong! I'm hoping that most people will see that this could turn out to be just *the thing* that pool needs and agree to give it a chance!
Anyway.... look forward to seeing you guys in Orlando and checking everything out first hand. I'm excited enough to PRACTICE.... and that hasn't happened in a real long time.....
Tammie Wesley-Jones
watchez said:Maybe I missed this but I was wondering after looking at the list of players---How come women were unable to play at the Derby City Classic last year but are able to play in the IPT tournaments? Did the women's tour sanction the IPT tour also to make it possible? I am sure there is an obvious answer that someone will tell me.
Donald A. Purdy said:Last time I checked, $150,000 would keep me in the game of life for about 1.5 years. After taxes maybe 1 year.
Don![]()
Eieio59 said:JAM...... YOU ROCK!you say what I feel, so I don't have to!
![]()
Tammie Wesley-Jones
onepocketchump said:Let's put it this way. The players go where the money is. If the top players on the WPBA want to play in the IPT then the WPBA will make it happen. It's all about media rights. I am sure that if whoever puts on tournaments tht are televised can come to an agreement with the WPBA then there is no problem with the WPBA players playing in those events. With Derby City it came down to media disputes.
John