Joint Concentricity with Pin-Jig Driver

scdiveteam

Rick Geschrey
Silver Member
Hi,

Sorry about the bad pics, my good camera is on the fritz.

Thanks to all who wanted to know more about our process for obtaining almost perfect joint concentricity while using different machines during the overall process without turning the shafts in on the cue butt in the lathe or using sanding mandrels. I have been working with this for about 2 years now and think I have tweaked about 95% of the efficiency out of this procedure.

The heart of this method is the use of one of our pins that have been parted in the center barrel area, then faced and then a 60 degree center is installed to create a business end (custom drive pin). This will act as the driver in the shaft tapering machine and the wood lathe for final sanding and burnishing between centers. By engineering a very tight fit of the threads to the pin via a stepped minor dia. we obtain a condition whereby the out side taper diameter is always concentric to the centerline axis of the work piece. "In Theory".

During this explanation, some of these details described may seem a little over the top at first but they are all critical in obtaining the end result. At the end of the description I will recap some of the details for clarification purposes.

To start out with, I dowel the 5/4 x 5/4 maple into 1" X 30" pieces. These dowels sit in a open barrel for years as dowels. At some time, I taper them down to .960 on the joint end and store them in a vertical shaft caddy with shaft inserts installed.

Before we drill and tap a shaft unit, we drill a .500 hole to the desired depth of our pin insertion length. A Garolite LE insert is machined to a dia. of .488 and a 1/8 hole is drilled through the center for a glue relief. This unit is epoxied in to the shaft hole and allowed to cure. Having this insert allows a more stable foundation for the taping and very important in this overall process. Without the insert it works most of the time but not all of the time because the wood hardness varies when viewed on a 360 degree basis within the hole dia.

When we decide to make a shaft we chuck up the tapered unit in the jaws of our lathe while holding it centered on the back chuck. My 6 jaw is adjusted to less than .001 run out and I check it a lot. My back chuck is not as accurate but it is close.

We do not use a collet on the wood and take a pretty firm grip on the wood with the jaws for pin installs and shaft taping. I have found that this is the most accurate way for me to perform the facing, drilling and taping of the shaft. Once you face and tap your threads the centerline axis will automatically go perpendicular to the face after the outside taper gets established. A collet can introduce a error to the mix. After I center drill, drill a.287 hole to my desired depth for pin insertion I bore the hole to about .312 + or minus .003.

At this point I use a 3/8 x 14 CNC Drill-Tap to drill out the bored hole to a depth of only .375. The drill size on the drill-tap is the correct minor dia. (I think it's .320 or so) for this 3/8 x 14 tap that is part of the spiral fluke of the tool. At this point I don't allow the tap to engage as I just use this drill part of the tool to create the .375 hole depth.

I remove the drill-tap and replace it with an exact duplicate tool that has had the drill dia. precision ground down to a dia. that is - .004 from the stock size. This tool is used to tap the thread into the wall of the hole but it also creates a stepped minor dia. within the insert due to the slightly ground drill part. After the cue is finished and ready for sale a bottom tap is used to chase the threads as a final step. Note, only the drill part dia. is ground, not the tap part. If I just use the standard Drill Tap you don't get that very tight fit needed for repeatability.

The end result of all of this reveals a threaded shaft insert that is 5 times stronger than wood that will thread onto the pin in a normal fashion for the first .375 and then become a very tight fit for the next .600 + until facing occurs with the butt joint. The insert material has a ductility and tensile strength that lends itself to a better taped thread and will not allow the thread to distort or fail like wood fibers ofter do when over torqued by the player.

Our custom drive pin is then screwed in to the shaft. Because of the tight fit, we have to use a hand adjustable drill chuck to hold the pin to turn it into the shaft. If the pin can be put into shaft by hand, you won't get the concentricity you are looking for with a repeatable end result.

The shaft is placed in the tapering machine between centers with this pin acting as the driver. The shaft is then tapered in the desired cut dia. in a sequence with sanding sealer applied between cuts.

Observation: Before putting the shaft in the machine that is set with a spring weight calibrated for 30" your must correct the for the length because the pin is sticking out. I cut our shaft to 29 and 1/8 and make the custom pin barrel stick out .645 from the end of the joint side. The 1/8 is for facing if needed later or it can be adjusted when the ferrule is installed. By experimenting with different pin shank lengths, I was able to find the optimum spring weight by controlling length rather than changing springs.

My units now have very light spring pressure and when I am making the final passes I don't get any distortions or swirl lines at all, just a very smooth rms finish. This was a very good collateral advantage learned by using this pin device.

I land the joint at +.002 from my finish number. When you put the shaft on the wood lathe to sand you must leave the pin driver in to creat the same concentricity on the new machine. In fact, I leave the pins in all of the shafts during the epoxy coats, sanding, finish coats, wet sanding and buffing processes. I have made a lot of the pin devices as they are on many shafts that are being worked on in the shop.

As for the butt tapering, I believe that for this concentricity process to work 100% of the time that the pin must be installed when the cue is a dowel rod so as the 60 degree center on the nose of the pin creates the axial centerline of the cue with the butt center and needs to be there sooner rather than later. In fact when doing CNC floating point cues, we build the entire cue with a 29" dowel at the center of all of the cored components. After the entire cue has been taken to 1 3/8, we install our pin while the cue is a 29" rod at 1 3/8 dia. Then off the the tapering machine for a hogging of the initial taper.

Clarification:

By holding the following details as a discipline, I have got the cues to mate up with fantastic concentricity before any coatings are applied:

1. The shaft and the butt must be chucked on the bare wood while facing, drilling or taping is being performed in the early stage of production. If you take out the cue or shaft from the chuck you can't go back and re chuck it again. You must put in a new insert and start over. When I was using a collet I did not get the same results and they varried. After chucking hard on the wood before facing and taping the results changed to great repeatable concentricity.

2. After you tap your hole put a 60 degree chamfer on the edge face of the hole so your can face later between centers using the drive pin if you have to whisker face for decor ring alignment. Also to let the repair man drive the shaft for maintenance. After the coating you can lose the cocentricity a little if you spray more material on one side than the other. Another reason to make sure you wet sand clear coat in the wood lathe with the pin in place.

3. I believe that using an insert is also critical because the material machines so much better than wood and also will be stronger without distorted or failed threads down the road from over tightening by the player. By using the the stepped tighter minor dia. the threads and the wall interface are so closely aligned that the concentricty can't be denied with the taper OD. The insert and the tight minor also assures that once the facing has been contacted when joining the cue, you can't make it rotate any further. After the cue is finished a rolls perfect on the table we use the bottom tap for the final tap pass clean up.

4. The pin must be installed early on in the process so that you have concentricity with the OD from the get go. When I make veneered point cues with an A- Joint, I put the pin in when the forearm wood is is a 1 3/8 dowel. I then take tapering cuts between centers with the pin center of the live side to create a geometry where the pin and the other center is aligned on the axial centerline with the joint at .925. When I cut the v grooves the piece is mounted on a 5c collet chuck and my pin is tightened into a special 3/4" OD maintenance pin centered in the collet. Because the points don’t move on the floating point CNC cues the cue is assembled and tapered down without worrying about the critical A-joint fit up.

5. Before we ground the drill part of the CNC Drill-Tap we were getting good results but they were not always consistent. Making that slight change in the minor dia. was like magic as the cues started to have almost perfect concentricity.

Note: This pin driver system was not easy to control and took me a lot of time trying different things. It works even though these shafts and butts are made on two separate table saw tapering machined, one metal lathe, and one wood lathe. The fact that these parts are made and moved from one machine to another with predictable concentricity is the payoff for the credibility of the process.

Thanks to Ray: Although I have painstakingly developed this process, I give all the credit to my partner and mentor Ray Hernanzez who was a tool and die engineer for 40 years. He thought of the idea and came up with the grinding of the Drill Tap which was the milestone that made this repeatable. His thoughts created the process, my sweat and trial and error refined it to to a procedure.

If any of you guys try this stuff and come up with a new twist that will make it work better, I would appreciate your feed back, peer check and review.

Sorry for this very long description but I wanted to express all the things that we did to bring this concentricity ship into the harbor.

Disclaimer: Just so everyone does not think I am some kind of internet loser who has nothing better to do with my time:

I am addicted to cue making and I know most of you guys share the same passion. I do have a life and all of this text I have spent two hours composing will be taken apart and used in my written QA/QC Procedure concerning this phase of the total process. So sharing this info and asking for peer check and review is and integral part of my Procedure guidelines overall. I am killing 2 birds with one stone!

I look forward to any suggestions or comments as I know we can always raise the bar.

Thanks,

Rick Geschrey

See pics below:
Chucking without a collet
100_1014.jpg

100_1012.jpg

Pin driver made from our joint pin - OD of the barrel looks bad as it has been exposed to schellac and clear coat overspray
100_1008.jpg

100_1007.jpg

CNC Drill Taps and Bottom Tap - Far right ground down .004, center standard, left is bottom tap
100_1006.jpg

Pin driver installed and in action
100_1004.jpg

100_1002.jpg

Tapering the butt between centers from the beginning to the end of the process
100_0999.jpg

100_1003.jpg

Leaving the pin in for all coatings, sanding, wet sanding and buffing.
100_1010.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hi,

I got 2 PM questions about this:

For the record, I stated that I taper with table saw machines. The pin driver is not exclusive to saw machines and will obviously work with any type of tapering machine. Getting the very light pressure between centers is a must for good shaft results. The metal to metal interface works fine after you find the desired length vs. spring or tail stock pressure.

Rick G
 
Last edited:
Final Result

Hi,

Here are the final pics of the cue that was shown in the description. Again, sorry for the poor quality, my son has misplaced the charger on our good camera. This is a very cheap digital camera and even after messing with the ISO settings the close ups are not very good.

Both the shafts and the butt where taken down to .843 on the tapering machines. Then all three joint collars were sanded independently with 220 to .840 between centers with the pin drivers in the shafts and the butt joint pin on the live side.

The cue was not put together and sanded nor was it joined and turned together. We simply sanded the collar ODs and checked for the .840 dimension with the mic. We screwed them together and got repeatable concentricity with both shafts mating to the butt. The cue is now ready for epoxy sealing and a clear coat finish.

Shown below is Jimmy Dill holding his first cue and showing his first experience with holding concentricity with the pin jig.

Thanks for all of the good will from all of you that contacted me concerning this procedure. It was my pleasure to share this discipline. I hope you will share your experiences with me as a peer check and review for my QA/QC program comments and review section.

Thanks,

Rick Geschrey

100_1024.jpg

100_1019.jpg

Jim is very new to cue making and was able to achieve great joint concentricity his first time out. It's that easy!!!
100_1025.jpg
 
Last edited:
A good topic Rick.
Collets are an interesting thing.I can understand why you use a buck chuck or similar.
Just finished doing some work on collets and checking concentricity.
Been looking at the ER type collets.
The original Regofix, standard and high precision series.
Then some copies with no mention of where they are made.
The standard Regofix in 20 mm was about .018 mmTIR on average. the range varied .012 to .024 mm. We had a 20 mm test piece and tightened, removed and replaced again.
The Regofix high precision was from .002mm to .006 mm TIR. A substantial improvement and really was not that much more money.
The unknown made copy collets were from .022 to .032 range tir mm.Quite dissapointing.
I know with the Hardinge lathes that I used to use, we regulary were within .0002 inches TIR and often better.
I am making a ER 40 spindle for one of my lathes,and will be using the better precision series collets.
 
I wish I had!

A good topic Rick.
Collets are an interesting thing.I can understand why you use a buck chuck or similar.
Just finished doing some work on collets and checking concentricity.
Been looking at the ER type collets.
The original Regofix, standard and high precision series.
Then some copies with no mention of where they are made.
The standard Regofix in 20 mm was about .018 mmTIR on average. the range varied .012 to .024 mm. We had a 20 mm test piece and tightened, removed and replaced again.
The Regofix high precision was from .002mm to .006 mm TIR. A substantial improvement and really was not that much more money.
The unknown made copy collets were from .022 to .032 range tir mm.Quite dissapointing.
I know with the Hardinge lathes that I used to use, we regulary were within .0002 inches TIR and often better.
I am making a ER 40 spindle for one of my lathes,and will be using the better precision series collets.

Neil,

All of my collets are home made and Are subject to the slight error of my chuck set up (less than half a thou per side on an ENCO lathe). I can't get it to do better than than that no matter how much I grind/ bore the jaws with live tooling and hone with lapping compound. I also have a Thomson rod and have my tail stock as close as I can get. As you know any collet error will amplify when the collect is re chucked. That is why we chuck on the wood to face and tap in one step. Once we get on the a axis with the taper machine, the face and the centerline are established to as high of an accuracy as I can get with this equipment. Once I take a piece out of the lathe it is never chucked again. If I have to face for decor ring line up, it is machine faced between centers. "It's and old Indian trick, but I think it will work":rotflmao:

I would love to find a Hardinge or something as accurate with a 1 3/8 spindle bore. My next machine will have a precision collet chuck and will be the last machine I buy. I currently have 13 lathe machines all dedicated for specific job set ups and am not thrilled at the idea of spending more on plant equipment.

I am currently setting up my new shop as I am going into cue making full time and selling my pool hall. Because of this technique and it's repeatability, I am not in a hurry to get the collet chucked machine but it is on the top of my want list.

Thanks for the creative insights you reveled to me in your PM.

Rick
 
Last edited:
Neil,

All of my collets are home made and Are subject to the slight error of my chuck set up (less than half a thou per side on an ENCO lathe). I can't get it to do better than than that no matter how much I grind/ bore the jaws with live tooling and hone with lapping compound. I also have a Thomson rod and have my tail stock as close as I can get. As you know any collet error will amplify when the collect is re chucked. That is why we chuck on the wood to face and tap in one step. Once we get on the a axis with the taper machine, the face and the centerline are established to as high of an accuracy as I can get with this equipment. Once I take a piece out of the lathe it is never chucked again. If I have to face for decor ring line up, it is machine faced between centers. "It's and old Indian trick, but I think it will work":rotflmao:

I would love to find a Hardinge or something as accurate with a 1 3/8 spindle bore. My next machine will have a precision collet chuck and will be the last machine I buy. I currently have 13 lathe machines all dedicated for specific job set ups and am not thrilled at the idea of spending more on plant equipment.

I am currently setting up my new shop as I am going into cue making full time and selling my pool hall. Because of this technique and it's repeatability, I am not in a hurry to get the collet chucked machine but it is on the top of my want list.

Thanks for the creative insights you reveled to me in your PM.

Rick


And I thought the 10 lathes in my shop were a lot. I had 12 but sold two recently.
 
My First Attempt

Hey Rick,
Thanks for posting pics of my first efforts! Very fun to come on here and see me! :-)
The procedure for the joint concentricity was really easy to follow, and as you have pointed out, yields really nice results. The fact that a novice like myself was able to achieve this kind of result shows how reliable this process is.
Thanks again for all your help.



Jimmy
 
As for the butt tapering, I believe that for this concentricity process to work 100% of the time that the pin must be installed when the cue is a dowel rod so as the 60 degree center on the nose of the pin creates the axial centerline of the cue with the butt center and needs to be there sooner rather than later. In fact when doing CNC floating point cues, we build the entire cue with a 29" dowel at the center of all of the cored components. After the entire cue has been taken to 1 3/8, we install our pin while the cue is a 29" rod at 1 3/8 dia. Then off the the tapering machine for a hogging of the initial taper.

When you install your pin before the intial tapering, what happens if the wood moves?

http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=182705

Concentricity can also be achieved after the final taper by indicating the joint collar in the chuck and installing the pin. This way, you removed the possiblity of waste due to wood movement, which can and will happen no matter how careful you are, what schedule you use, or how old your wood is.
 
Last edited:
When you install your pin before the intial tapering, what happens if the wood moves?

http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=182705

Concentricity can also be achieved after the final taper by indicating the joint collar in the chuck and installing the pin. This way, you removed the possiblity of waste due to wood movement, which can and will happen no matter how careful you are, what schedule you use, or how old your wood is.

Hi,

The process I have described here is only one way of skinning the cat.

I think anyone who tries it will be amazed at the accuracy especially when moving a piece from machine to machine during the overall process. I like it because I like getting repeatable results without using a sanding mandrel or turning the shafts into the cue. When my shafts and butts come off 2 different tapering saw machines, they are concentric and on dimension.

If you are a pin last guy, my way of doing things is the antithesis of your procedure and thats ok. I core my cues from end to end and have not had any experience with movement in the butts. On point veneer cues I do install an A-Joint pin and the tapering process starts at around .920 with all of the components of the cue cored from the A-Joint back to the butt cap. The A-Joint tenon is the end of the core rod.

As for the wood moving during the shaft tapering process, the same question can be asked about wood movement after reaching or approaching the final dimension. Although your point is well taken, if you age and process select shaft wood, this should not be much of a problem. I do seal the shaft wood between passes. If a shaft is bad throw it away and start over.

Rick G
 
Last edited:
If you are a pin last guy, my way of doing things is the antithesis of your procedure and thats ok.

Not really. Antithesis is the opposite/contrast. We are both installing a pin.

I core my cues from end to end and have not had any experience with movement in the butts.

So do I and most of the makers in the thread I posted as a reference.

As for the wood moving during the shaft tapering process, the same question can be asked about wood movement after reaching or approaching the final dimension.

But installing the pin after the final turn MINIMIZES the chance of waste. It does not eliminate. Wood has internal stresses that you cannot see. If the cue makes it to the final pass, there is a good chance it will stay straight. No cannot say that when you install your pin.

Although your point is well taken, if you age and process select shaft wood, this should not be much of a problem.

Ballpark, how many cues have you made? If you have never had wood move, you haven't made enough. There isn't a cue maker reading this that believes you haven't had one go south on you.

I am not saying your idea doesn't work. I am saying that installing the pin before the initial turn is more risky than waiting. Are you tapping your shafts while they are in dowel form as well?
 
Ballpark, how many cues have you made? If you have never had wood move, you haven't made enough. There isn't a cue maker reading this that believes you haven't had one go south on you.

I am not saying your idea doesn't work. I am saying that installing the pin before the initial turn is more risky than waiting. Are you tapping your shafts while they are in dowel form as well?

Hi,

Sometimes taking a risk pays off and conventional thinking needs to be questioned! It is only by taking a questioning attitude can one raise the bar of expectations to reveal a world class culture in any endeavor. If you don't reach for the highest apple on the tree, you will settle for less or average results from your efforts.

I don't care when anyone puts in their pin, it is none of my business. I am not trying to get anyone to change the way they do their business.

If you run into a piece of wood that is bumping, what do you do? You take light cuts and put it aside. At some time in the future you go back and check it and take more cuts. When I take a 1 3/8 inch assembled cue as a straight rod with an uninterrupted 29" stepped core and put an initial taper on it, I still have about .125 left to cut. Tell me, what is the difference between taking cuts on a fully assembled cue that has a glued skeletal center structure ( core) as to cutting pieces of wood and tapering them before you assemble them. I admit I don't do that with veneered point cue forearms yet as I don't want the points to move if the annulus between the core and the ID of the forearm become eccentric during glueing thus throwing off my centers. I am working on a steady rest bearing collet that is showing some progress in that area and I will eventually core my point cues as well.

I shared this Joint Concentricity drive pin system in detail to share info that was requested by an inquiring fellow AZer and to ask for peer check and review. That simple.

Yes, I know about the fact that wood moves. That is one of the main reasons I went to coring everything I can. Since doing so, I am overjoyed!

I am just finishing my 68th & 69th cue today and have been doing cue repair and building cues for about 8 years while I run my pool hall. Most of that 7 years I have been seasoning a lot of wood and spending much time modifying my equipment so that almost every operation has it's own machine & set up. I am selling my pool hall, building my new shop and am going full time cue making as my plant equipment and QA/QC procedures have been developed and processed. My QA/QC Program Procedure follows the guidelines of 10 CFR 50: Appendex B as my template for all of activities from qualifying vendors, inspections, handling & storage, all machining dimensions, tolerances, joining, finishing and defining all environmental and temperature control issues for storage and applications concerning raw materials and products.

10 CFR 50 Appendix B is the standard applied for Manufacturing, Maintenance, and Operations of all safety related items and systems in Nuclear Power Plants within the US as mandated by the US NRC. Since this is the highest standard and by applying cue making to this guidance, it is a cinch to be able to attain the best Proprietary Quality Control for Cue Making in the world. Part of this type of activity requires raising the bar and expectations for every step in the process. Taking a questioning attitude, sharing information within the industry for peer check and review, beta testing and embracing the program in detail produces results that are world class.

No, I don't taper my final shaft product directly from dowels. The dowels are tapered and light cuts have been taken over years before the inserts are installed and it is faced, drilled and taped. That's elementary!

I turn my butt wood down from 1 1/2 to a little under 1 3/8 before I core and perform glue up. I really don't care what anyone else believes if my cues spin without a bump in the lathe. If they did move I guess I would change the way I am doing business. It would be pathological if I had cues that were bumping and did not acknowledge that as a fact. It makes no sense to do something that produces a negative result. I take all of this stuff very seriously and am not trying to bullshit you or anyone else.

FYI, as part of my program guidelines, I have been monitoring about 20 beta cues in the field that I gave away to my employees and league members for field testing. There are also at least another 30 cues I have made that frequent my pool hall. Not one of them has come up lame. They all roll true! I know because I make it my business to check that fact. The way you explain things it seems you feel that no matter what you do, some of your cues are going to move. If I thought that, I would quit right now. Maybe at sometime in the future all of my cues will go south because my observation period that I am using for objective review was not long enough. If that is that case, I will have to live with the consequences. At least I have a sample group I am observing.

I did not try to sell one cue before I knew they were holding up in the field. Money and sales has never been my motivation at all. I make much more money doing cue repair than making cues anyway considering the time element.

Your questions are welcome and I hope that anyone who tries my concentricity procedure takes the time to comment or make useful suggestions.

Rick G
 
Last edited:
Back
Top