I agree with Undeclocked
If this guy could have seen Underclocked shoot snooker back in the mid 80's then he would probably never want to look at another jump cue or question anything Underclocked said pertaining to the game.
If this guy could have seen Underclocked shoot snooker back in the mid 80's then he would probably never want to look at another jump cue or question anything Underclocked said pertaining to the game.
I disagree. I had the 2nd best jump shot maker that I know do several jump shots from one area of the table. The shots required a quick jump as the ball being jumped wasn't far from the cue ball. Every point where his shots originated a contact impression was made by his ceramic tip. The cue ball would then settle into each of those spots when tested. The indent was not just in the cloth as it was obvious that it was also in the slate itself.
It isn't just about the cloth used on the table.
Jump shots still cause the same damage they always have, it's just that the lighter jump cues may hit with less momentum.
By the way, that player still shoots jump shots very effectively even though he now now knows the shots are damaging the table. I cannot fault him as he plays against other players doing the same thing.
I think there is a lot of defensive hype about jump shots. Try that little experiment for yourself (hopefully on your own table).