jjinfla said:Think of it as "sacrificing yourself for the good of the team".
Ha Ha.
Just like a baseball player puts down a bunt, or grounds to 2nd to advance a runner or hits a long sacrifice fly to score a run.
Same in football.
When playing on a team one must do what is good for the team. And that is not always what is best for the individual. Otherwise why play on a team?
Save your best games for tournament play or gambling one on one.
And yes I have come to believe that gambling, even for small sums, is the best way to improve your game. Just find someone who plays the same speed as you or slightly better. That way you just take turns holding the money.
Those of you who like to tout the "sandbagging is wrong" mantra have all been hoodwinked by the league operators. It is in their best interests for everyone to play their best because then it splits up the team and brings in more players for the operators. And that means more money in their pocket. And what happens to the team? It breaks up and can't win any money or go to Vegas.
Jake
Your baseball analogy is horrible. In baseball, a player's individual statistics are not harmed by a sacrifice fly or a sacrifice bunt - they don't even count as official at-bats. In fact, in the cases where sacrifices result in runs scored (RBI), a player's individual statistics increase. Sacrifices are a sound strategy in baseball, and players, as well as their teams, are rewarded for them. Sacrifice doesn't mean "to play bad on purpose." Sandbagging in a pool league isn't a sacrifice, it's stupid, it's cheating, it's dishonest, it's a waste of time, and it's a waste of money.
Where do you see sacrifices in football?
It seems to me that you have a skewed version of what "for the good of the team" means. To me, since league players aren't professional athletes and aren't going to get rich playing in leagues, "good of the team" means people who play to the best of their abilities, get along with each other, have fun, and try to get better. Winning, losing, and definitely losing on purpose don't even factor into that particular equation.
In my opinion, anybody who touts "sandbagging is right" probably can't play very well, doesn't think very well, or has incredibly low self-esteem. Your advocation of sandbagging leads me to believe that you're proud of mediocrity and believe it should be rewarded - you don't think players should even try to get better, or they won't be able to play in a league anymore. Personally, I think excellence should be rewarded and is its own reward, but maybe that's just me.
It seems to me that your biggest gripe is that leagues are in business to make money and sandbagging is your way to "stick it to the man." Their obvious formula is to have handicaps go up as players get better so new players are constantly fed into the system. This is no secret, and obviously the system works - players have fun, some make money in Vegas, and the business still makes at least enough money for the leagues to continue to operate. Would you rather have the leagues go out of business? Then NOBODY goes to Vegas. Yeah, that sounds like a better scenario....

Since when did it become wrong in this country for businesses to make money? I don't hear anybody whining about Bill Gates having more money than God. Why are you so worried about your $10/week league dues? If you can't afford it, or you're worried about a return on that investment, put your money in a 401k - don't waste time in a league.
-djb <-- not surprised to learn that Jake approves of sandbagging