Legal trickshot, physically possible?

Thank you..

I tried to tell people its a fairly easy shot, but things get over complicated I think..

If you strike it harder, and draw a bit more, you will get more of the reaction in the video. Plus, your cloth is not as new as the video so it won't slide as much..

Good shot.
 
Thank you..

I tried to tell people its a fairly easy shot, but things get over complicated I think..

If you strike it harder, and draw a bit more, you will get more of the reaction in the video. Plus, your cloth is not as new as the video so it won't slide as much..

Good shot.
It was a good shot, but it wasn't the same shot. This CB reacted normally, caroming straight along the tangent line nearly parallel with the long rail, not diving straight into the rail like in the OP's video. Apples and oranges.

pj
chgo
 
It was a good shot, but it wasn't the same shot. This CB reacted normally, caroming straight along the tangent line nearly parallel with the long rail, not diving straight into the rail like in the OP's video. Apples and oranges.

pj
chgo

The CB does not hit the rail. The english catches before it hits the rail.
 
You jerked your stick back after striking the cue ball. What happens if you follow all the way through?

Nice table.

I just tried the shot myself, and made it on the first try! (Lucky, I promise:))

Notice, my CB went forward maybe 1/4 ball diameter. I think this was actually due to the camera perspective and slight cut angle. I hit it with slight low right.

You can put the video to play on slow motion speed on the youtube settings. And I have the original recording that is 24 frames per second, and I can show further frames if anyone wants to see them (I think I can anyway...)


https://youtu.be/TPqeRt-7oXY
 
The CB does not hit the rail. The english catches before it hits the rail.
If it didn't hit the rail (I think it did), it came close enough to make it a far different shot than iusedtoberich's.

The screengrabs below show the same moment of both shots: when the OBs hit the pockets (you can still see the OBs). Look where the CBs are. iusedtoberich's CB has caromed sideways a few inches and never went farther forward than that - the other CB has traveled almost straight forward into the rail, much faster than normal.

pj
chgo

View attachment 77468
 

Attachments

  • shot.jpg
    shot.jpg
    80.6 KB · Views: 219
My shot was the same "idea" as the Facebook video in question. Sure, the balls might have been an inch or so different locations, and of course, I did not have that blocking ball. But the point of the Facebook shot was to curve with a lot of draw, and come back into the hanging ball in the corner. My shot and the Facebook shot both took very similar paths.

The differeecnce between our shots, and the whole point of this thread, is that in the Facebook shot, the CB went forward of the tangent line (while having insane amounts of draw) by several ball diameters. My CB went forward of the tangent line only about 1/4 ball diameter, and as I said in my video post, that was most likely an optical illusion due to the camera angle and cut angle.

Both shots are fundamentally the same. Mine was a legal hit. The Facebook one was either a double hit, or a trick OB/CB mass setup.
 
If you hit the cue ball hard with follow or draw and cut the object ball at a slight angle, the following will happen:
1. Upon collision, the object ball will move forward very fast. But the cue ball would get stuck there (what I call "it hesitates") for a very brief moment before moving again.
2. And when the cue ball moves, it will first slide sideway along the tangent line, and then go forward (or backward) in a parabola path.

Unless it is a double-hit, the cue ball will never travel almost as fast as the object ball, and the cue ball will never go forward at a sharp angle immediately without first sliding along the tangent line

To illustrate this to yourself, shoot such a shot with the cue ball and object ball set 2 feet apart. This "2 feet apart" is short enough that the effect would be exactly the same as "2 inches" apart, but you're know for sure what you won't double-hit.

You can see from Patrick's screenshot that, in the original shot, the cue ball goes forward too sharply (less than 45 degrees angle, no sideway sliding along the tangent line at all) and too quickly (reaching the rail almost right after the object ball). Both are strong indicators that it is a double-hit.

I just tried the shot myself, and made it on the first try! (Lucky, I promise:))

Notice, my CB went forward maybe 1/4 ball diameter. I think this was actually due to the camera perspective and slight cut angle. I hit it with slight low right.

You can put the video to play on slow motion speed on the youtube settings. And I have the original recording that is 24 frames per second, and I can show further frames if anyone wants to see them (I think I can anyway...)


https://youtu.be/TPqeRt-7oXY

I thank you too (but not for Wybrook's reason). You have just demonstrated for us that the cue ball first "hesitates", and then slide sideawy along the tangent line, and then the draw takes and it curves along a parabolic path.

Like Patrick Johnson said, your shot is good but it's very different from the original shot. It doesn't prove or disprove anything about the original shot.

You were happy that you "made it". But the whole point of this discussion is not about pocketing the corner ball. It's about making a good hit.

Thank you..

I tried to tell people its a fairly easy shot, but things get over complicated I think..

If you strike it harder, and draw a bit more, you will get more of the reaction in the video. Plus, your cloth is not as new as the video so it won't slide as much..

Good shot.

If you can't tell that iusedtoberich's shot is different from the original shot, then I don't know what to say.

You jerked your stick back after striking the cue ball. What happens if you follow all the way through?

Nice table.

If he had followed all the way, he might have hit the cue ball twice. There's nothing wrong with pulling the cue back to avoid a double-hit. Sometimes you just have to do that.

My shot was the same "idea" as the Facebook video in question. Sure, the balls might have been an inch or so different locations, and of course, I did not have that blocking ball. But the point of the Facebook shot was to curve with a lot of draw, and come back into the hanging ball in the corner. My shot and the Facebook shot both took very similar paths.

The differeecnce between our shots, and the whole point of this thread, is that in the Facebook shot, the CB went forward of the tangent line (while having insane amounts of draw) by several ball diameters. My CB went forward of the tangent line only about 1/4 ball diameter, and as I said in my video post, that was most likely an optical illusion due to the camera angle and cut angle.

Both shots are fundamentally the same. Mine was a legal hit. The Facebook one was either a double hit, or a trick OB/CB mass setup.

The whole point of this discussion is whether you can shoot the Facebook shot without double-hitting. And you showed us a different shot.

To any future brave contestant: if you think you can make the cue ball goes forward directly and immediately at such a sharp angle without double-hitting, then do it again with the cue ball and object ball set 2 feet apart.
 
.... snip....
The whole point of this discussion is whether you can shoot the Facebook shot without double-hitting. And you showed us a different shot.
....snip....

I think we might have to agree to disagree. My shot was the same idea as the FB shot, same hit, same execution, same CB path (all within reasonable variations). Believe me, I fully understand the point of this thread, and it was not for me to pocket the hanging object ball, lol.

The differnece was my shot was legal, the FB was not legal. That is why his CB went significanly forward, and mine went as you described, the proper way. There is no way for me to do what the FB video does, unless I try to intentionally double hit it, or use a 3 cushion ball for my CB.

Again, the shots are the same, just one was legal, the other was not. I don't understand how anyone can say differntly?
 
Who cares if Juan Pablo's hit was good or not?

Even if it's a foul, it's not like he's going to understand any of us when we try to tell him.
 
It was a good shot, but it wasn't the same shot. This CB reacted normally, caroming straight along the tangent line nearly parallel with the long rail, not diving straight into the rail like in the OP's video. Apples and oranges.

pj
chgo

I think the same
 
I seriously doubt the point of this thread was to come up with a good reason to tell some guy his hit was bad.

Let me go out on a limb and say the "point" of this thread was to discuss something billiards related in a billiards forum.

Who cares if Juan Pablo's hit was good or not?

Even if it's a foul, it's not like he's going to understand any of us when we try to tell him.
 
My shot was the same "idea" as the Facebook video in question. Sure, the balls might have been an inch or so different locations, and of course, I did not have that blocking ball. But the point of the Facebook shot was to curve with a lot of draw, and come back into the hanging ball in the corner. My shot and the Facebook shot both took very similar paths.

The differeecnce between our shots, and the whole point of this thread, is that in the Facebook shot, the CB went forward of the tangent line (while having insane amounts of draw) by several ball diameters. My CB went forward of the tangent line only about 1/4 ball diameter, and as I said in my video post, that was most likely an optical illusion due to the camera angle and cut angle.

Both shots are fundamentally the same. Mine was a legal hit. The Facebook one was either a double hit, or a trick OB/CB mass setup.

In your shot, the cue ball didn't go forward the tangent line, just followed it, not totally parallel to the rail because of the small cut. There is a BIG difference between both shots, the fact that they look aesthetically similar at first glance doesn't mean they are the same...
 
I think we might have to agree to disagree. My shot was the same idea as the FB shot, same hit, same execution, same CB path (all within reasonable variations). Believe me, I fully understand the point of this thread, and it was not for me to pocket the hanging object ball, lol.

The differnece was my shot was legal, the FB was not legal. That is why his CB went significanly forward, and mine went as you described, the proper way. There is no way for me to do what the FB video does, unless I try to intentionally double hit it, or use a 3 cushion ball for my CB.

Again, the shots are the same, just one was legal, the other was not. I don't understand how anyone can say differntly?

The reason to ask if the shot is physically possible, is that there is a ball blocking the tangent line, so at first I though he was going to jump and draw over it... but then, I saw what he did was a curve around the ball, I saw something weird...
Without a blocking ball, the shot is not very difficult, just a power draw.

On the other hand, if the shot was a hustler one, hats off, to make a controlled double hit you need some skill!
 
We're all saying the same thing - the shots had the same intent but different outcomes and legality.



pj

chgo


Ha. Yeah, agree:)

I'll try to duplicate more closely the shot today. I'll try first hitting it substantially harder to see the results. Then I'll try to double hit it if I can to see those results. I'll record it.
 
Maybe someone should post a video of a blatant double hit where the cueball actually maintains the draw effect.

Typically, the cueball races forward on a double hit almost out accelerating the object ball, negating any english that you tried to use.
I don't really understand how a double hit in the video, would actually allow the draw to still happen, unless it's the extra close proximity, that allows the cueball to be hit in a virtually identical spot, twice, so that the draw takes.

Someone please demonstrate a double hit where they draw the ball.

And if this video does indeed demonstrate a double hit, does that mean that the trick shot that people set up with the cueball frozen to a line of 3 frozen object balls (all in a straight line) and draw the daylights out of the cueball a bunch of rails as a result, is really a double hit?
 
Maybe someone should post a video of a blatant double hit where the cueball actually maintains the draw effect.

Typically, the cueball races forward on a double hit almost out accelerating the object ball, negating any english that you tried to use.
I don't really understand how a double hit in the video, would actually allow the draw to still happen, unless it's the extra close proximity, that allows the cueball to be hit in a virtually identical spot, twice, so that the draw takes.

Someone please demonstrate a double hit where they draw the ball.

Well said. I think if the original shot was a double hit, the CB would have gone into the rail at a high speed. But instead it appears to draw back before it hits the rail. Maybe he just barely nicked the double hit.
 
Maybe someone should post a video of a blatant double hit where the cueball actually maintains the draw effect.

Typically, the cueball races forward on a double hit almost out accelerating the object ball, negating any english that you tried to use.
I don't really understand how a double hit in the video, would actually allow the draw to still happen, unless it's the extra close proximity, that allows the cueball to be hit in a virtually identical spot, twice, so that the draw takes.

Someone please demonstrate a double hit where they draw the ball.

And if this video does indeed demonstrate a double hit, does that mean that the trick shot that people set up with the cueball frozen to a line of 3 frozen object balls (all in a straight line) and draw the daylights out of the cueball a bunch of rails as a result, is really a double hit?
I think your question is a good one, but the "draw off a line of balls" shot isn't equivalent - the cue ball doesn't go forward in that shot.

pj
chgo
 
Ok, I set it up again trying to get the exact ball positions from the FB video.

The first few shots are HARD, and legal. The CB goes on the expected legal path (not forward of the tangent line).

Then, I intentionally tried to double hit the CB. It took a bunch of tries, but 3 of the shots were "very close" to the FB video, with the CB going well forward of the tangent line, before coming back.

Sorry this video is longer, about 7 min, but it took a bunch of tries to get the double hit to work just right. You will see that when the "double hit" is "too much", the CB goes right in the side pocket. But when the double hit is "just right", the CB takes the path of the FB video.

I wish I had a piece of formica to lay on the table and see what would happen with significantly less friction, than even brand new cloth probalby.

The successful recreation of the FB video is at time stamp 3:12 (so-so), 6:10 (so-so), 6:40 (looks almost identical to me)

Enjoy:)

http://youtu.be/p5-yrxbSEaY
 
Back
Top