List of current (2019) professional pocket dimensions?

I have a set of templates which show every possible dimensions for 9 foot pool tables. It covers pocket sizes both corner and middles, It shows you where the slate and fall of slate should be.
You can make judgements on how you want your pockets to play.
But surely the ideal scenario would be for all table mechanics to fit table to the template. That way everybody could start from a consistent level.
Every table that is used for a major event could have it's dimensions checked (and be issued with a certificate) before hosting an important match.
Now when you say every table for a "major" event....3 questions for you, 1st) name 4 different manufacturers building tables AND supplying them in this country, 2nd, who designed the pocket jig you're refering to? 3dr, do you have any idea how much worked is involved in changing the pocket sizes?
 
Is there an emoji for "anguished groan"? 4.25 inch Pockets or smaller, really? I can't believe how good People are that they need Pockets that small not to run the set out.

Where I live there are tons of complainers about Pocket sizes, mostly they want them smaller, because "that's what the pros use". Now when they watch the pros, they don't take into account that they play on brand New cloth which makes the table play easy, nor that they play on often factory new tables with brand new pocket facings etc. They also seem to forget that they are pros. Maybe more importantly, they forget that they themselves are not pros, which is quite a bit harder to comprehend for me personally, especially since all the pocket complainers here are generally terrible, or average players at the very best (being generous). So they spend all their time on the tightest table, banging balls into the rails, while simultaneously whining about the Pockets being to big.

Practising Your technique will make you a better player, a tighter table to play on will not.

There is no standard to anything in pool, which is why it is in it's current, lamentable state. Every Tom, Dick and Harry who has two dollars to rub together can hold a tournament and dictate every aspect of the Equipment and generally if they have enough Money get the tournament approved by the governing bodies. The WPA regulations are fairly decent (though a bit out of touch and would need more detailed guidelines), except most tournaments nowadays seem to ignore them completely. In an ideal world, we would have Pocket templates like in snooker, but we're decades away from that. For anything like it to work, you'd need extremely detailed specs and governing bodies that actually had a possibility of sanctioning People who didn't conform. Being that pool has no Money anyway, there isn't a chance of that, and without proper rules and specs there is not chance of the Professional game coming back. It's an impossible situation.
 
Last edited:
This nimrod came in the 'hall a while back and asked about the pocket sizes. The front two GC's(4's btw) are around 4.25" and he took one. This jackass couldn't play dead in a western. He talked like he'd spent half his life debating pocket size on here. Folks, anything less than 4.5" is a tough track. And if pocket-angles and shelf are just right it can be brutally tough.
 
Watch this

Amateurs..but GOOD amateurs. mid 600's to low 700's Fargo ratings playing on a Brunswick with 4 1/4" pockets. Kind of tough for me to judge the cut angle, but it seems tough as well. Anyway, watch and decide for yourself if you want your home table to play at this level of difficulty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhwnmtwEDMo
 
Practising Your technique will make you a better player, a tighter table to play on will not.

I’d suggest that snooker players have the best technique of the cuesports, and that that technique develops out of necessity due to the precision required to pot a ball into man extremely tight pocket 10 feet away.

I know that since I started playing US Pool after moving to a country that doesn’t have snooker tables, my technique has completely changed. I just don’t need the cueing precision I needed on a snooker table.

Of course, US table brought with them new challenges, but technique certainly wasn’t one of them.
 
Amateurs..but GOOD amateurs. mid 600's to low 700's Fargo ratings playing on a Brunswick with 4 1/4" pockets. Kind of tough for me to judge the cut angle, but it seems tough as well. Anyway, watch and decide for yourself if you want your home table to play at this level of difficulty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhwnmtwEDMo
Wow, the pockets were so tight on that table that there was virtually no shelf in those corner pockets! I fast forwarded it to the hill-hill game. Easy for me to say as I wasn't in his shoes, but it was apparent the gentleman who missed the shots he shouldn't of missed, which eventually cost him the game, was feeling the heat and the weight of his entire team on his shoulders. He appeared to take way too long and showed too much indecision before shooting these shots - even though for a player of his level he shouldn't have had to. You simply cannot let yourself be intimidated by tight pockets or by the gravity of the moment - you have to keep your confidence and focus, and not stray from your normal pre-shot routine, which he appeared to be guilty of doing.
 
Wow, the pockets were so tight on that table that there was virtually no shelf in those corner pockets! I fast forwarded it to the hill-hill game. Easy for me to say as I wasn't in his shoes, but it was apparent the gentleman who missed the shots he shouldn't of missed, which eventually cost him the game, was feeling the heat and the weight of his entire team on his shoulders. He appeared to take way too long and showed too much indecision before shooting these shots - even though for a player of his level he shouldn't have had to. You simply cannot let yourself be intimidated by tight pockets or by the gravity of the moment - you have to keep your confidence and focus, and not stray from your normal pre-shot routine, which he appeared to be guilty of doing.

Good observation...both on the pockets and the pressure. The fargo ratings of both players low 700's. Damian is a player many hate to draw early. That was the ONLY match he lost over the two days. The experience of the older player Steve probably helped him overcome misses better. For those who want to watch, go to around 2 hours 11 minutes. The game before was huge as well. Washington would have won it all if they'd won either game. So, congratulations to team Oregon for winning this Mosconi Cup style event.
 
Last edited:
Amateurs..but GOOD amateurs. mid 600's to low 700's Fargo ratings playing on a Brunswick with 4 1/4" pockets. Kind of tough for me to judge the cut angle, but it seems tough as well. Anyway, watch and decide for yourself if you want your home table to play at this level of difficulty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhwnmtwEDMo

Will admit to not watching the entire 2 hour, 25 minutes. But did not see too many misses where 1/8" on either side of the pocket center line would have made a ball.
 
Back
Top