poolplaya1976
Banned
just been eliminated by a guy I have never heard of
just been eliminated by a guy I have never heard of
Yea, his break in his last match absolutely killed him. I'm surprised he did not change it up.
just goes to show the depth of field for little ko to be gone after his 3rd match
Yea, his break in his last match absolutely killed him. I'm surprised he did not change it up.
it happens, its pool. if you guys been around in pool for ages you should know that its not always the better player wins, so many good players in pool, the winner is determined by layouts and rolls also added to it skill, so skill means nothing, pool is almost like gamble, I love the game but thats how it really is.
I made a post awhile back about this same subject, that any given player can beat any other given player even if the skill is different, it doesn't matter, you will see it over and over, this is pool, not golf or tennis where the better player 90% of the time wins. pool is like 50% 50% if the skill is close enough, then any1 can win and it depends
Is Earl still in it thanks.
Short race tourney pool doesn't identify the best player every time because of the high variance. At some point you guys with limited knowledge will start to see it. It's why tourneys aren't long races because 1) the excitement factor wouldn't be the same and 2) the same guy would win every time (Shane)
Maybe little Ko can head over to Q Masters and make it in time for the Tuesday night handicap tourney
just been eliminated by a guy I have never heard of
They will NEVER understand. Not the higest IQ's around here.
you people and your variance lol.......watching too much internet poker obviously.....the next time one of you geniuses say it isn't an "upset" we will start betting 10k per match and I get to pick all the favorites :withstupid:
What's your problem with variance? It's the same thing as an "upset"... just the explanation behind it really. There shouldn't be an argument here.
You just said in another post that Ko would have won 8 out of 10 times. That's probably true in a race to 11. In a race to 50, it's probably 10 out of 10 times.
What's your problem with variance? It's the same thing as an "upset"... just the explanation behind it really. There shouldn't be an argument here.
You just said in another post that Ko would have won 8 out of 10 times. That's probably true in a race to 11. In a race to 50, it's probably 10 out of 10 times.
Short race tourney pool doesn't identify the best player every time because of the high variance. At some point you guys with limited knowledge will start to see it. It's why tourneys aren't long races because 1) the excitement factor wouldn't be the same and 2) the same guy would win every time (Shane)
Maybe little Ko can head over to Q Masters and make it in time for the Tuesday night handicap tourney
Your going to take Shane against the field 100% of the time just because its a long race???
I really like Shane's game, but he's not head and shoulders above everybody else in the world no matter how long the race!
just been eliminated by a guy I have never heard of
Ivica is an AZmember.
Congrats to one of our own:thumbup: