9balllvr said:Just curious to find out what players on the board think the advantages or disadvantages of a longer cue would be....for instance, a 63" or so cue versus a 58"-60". Do you really think that it would help with balance, etc.?
Thanks in advance.
9balllvr
Salamander said:I have a modest collection of cues, one of them is a zylr which is balanced 19.5' from the butt. Although the cue "hits" good, I can't play with it because the balance throws me off.
Regards,
Doug
iusedtoberich said:I'm 6-3 and play fine with a 58 inch cue. I never tried a longer one, but I will sometime in the future. I am rarely in the wrap area, except when I choke up for frozen on the rail shots.
One thing that occasionally happens to me however, is my cue stick will slip out of my back hand and come crashing to the table on the follow through of certain shots. I'd say it happens about once a week. Good thing I gave up fancy inlaid cues years ago in favor of a cue that I don't mind getting dings in. lol.
9balllvr said:Just curious to find out what players on the board think the advantages or disadvantages of a longer cue would be....for instance, a 63" or so cue versus a 58"-60". Do you really think that it would help with balance, etc.?
Thanks in advance.
9balllvr
CaptainJR said:At the little 9 ball tournament this weekend a guy had a shot that for me would require a rake. He went over to his gear and picked up a plastic tube. It looked like a golf bag tube. Slipped it over the end of his stick and wow, this thing was lllooonnnggg. Is this think legal? Is there a limit to the length of a stick allowed? I wasn't playing in the match, but even if I was and new it wasn't allowed, I wouldn't have said anything to him. He only had one leg and I knew that he had trouble reaching some shots because of it that a person with two legs could be a lot more comfortable at. It just wouldn't seem right to call something like that on him. Seemed like a very nice fellow and he was obviously enjoying the tournament.
Shorty said:For an obviously disabled player such as himself, yes, it is perfectly legal. I am a wheelchair player and often use that cue extender called a Cue Reach, and it is perfectly legal in every APA, and every other event I have played. As long as it is not an aiming I believe it is perfectly legal.
Someone can feel free to correct me if I am wrong?
Shorty
Jerry Forsyth said:A couple of thoughts on this thread. First, the Cue Reach and other extenders are legal. Second, on cue length, I had a very interesting conversation with Pat Fleming at the Glass City Open this year. Pat plays with a cue that is either 52" or 53" (I don't exactly remember). He says he used to play with a 58" cue and then had a cuemaker reduce it by one inch. He says his accuracy improved so much that he had another inch removed, then another and so on. He says the accuracy improved with each reduction in length. His theory is that the shorter the cue the easier it is to aim it accurately. Of course, stature and personal preferences may dictate vastly different choices for different players. But shortening the cue length for accuracy makes more sense to me than lengthening it. If the concern is that some shots could not then be reached without a bridge then the proper answer may be to play better position, eh? By the way, he had his cuemaker make him a final version at the shorter length where both the butt and the shaft were equal in length.
-Jerry
CaptainJR said:Is there a limit to the number of cues you can use in a match?
Let me see here.
1. Break cue
2. Normal shooting cue.
3. Jump cue
4. Extra short cue (for when accuracy is needed, see quote above)
5. Extra long cue (to avoid using rake or to use with rake)
6. Cue for putting rake on the end.
7-11. 1-5 with extra soft tip.
12-16 1-5 above with extra hard tip.
I'm going to have to get a golf bag and a caddie!
Jerry Forsyth said:A couple of thoughts on this thread. First, the Cue Reach and other extenders are legal. Second, on cue length, I had a very interesting conversation with Pat Fleming at the Glass City Open this year. Pat plays with a cue that is either 52" or 53" (I don't exactly remember). He says he used to play with a 58" cue and then had a cuemaker reduce it by one inch. He says his accuracy improved so much that he had another inch removed, then another and so on. He says the accuracy improved with each reduction in length. His theory is that the shorter the cue the easier it is to aim it accurately. Of course, stature and personal preferences may dictate vastly different choices for different players. But shortening the cue length for accuracy makes more sense to me than lengthening it. If the concern is that some shots could not then be reached without a bridge then the proper answer may be to play better position, eh? By the way, he had his cuemaker make him a final version at the shorter length where both the butt and the shaft were equal in length.
-Jerry
chefjeff said:I have zero idea why a limit is imposed.
Jeff Livingston
CaptainJR said:At the little 9 ball tournament this weekend a guy had a shot that for me would require a rake. He went over to his gear and picked up a plastic tube. It looked like a golf bag tube. Slipped it over the end of his stick and wow, this thing was lllooonnnggg. Is this think legal? Is there a limit to the length of a stick allowed?