Match Fixing

It happens, no idea how common it is. An example mentioned in the big higgins thread would be the 1991 tournament of champions. Apparently several big name pool players rigged it so that a relative unknown (Mike LeBron, who vegas handicapped at 20-to-1) could take it all.

There's no proof of it, it could be that the unknown happened to catch a lot of top players with their pants down. But some respected and knowledgeable people think it was fixed.

http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=185613

It's not uncommon for pool players to split first and 2nd prize money if there's a large enough difference in payouts, but that's different. Both players have no reason to throw the match, they still will play to win even if it's just for a trophy.
 


Do you ever get any rumours or evidence of match fixing or rigging in pool matches? Is it common or does it just not happen? .I ask after our revelations in snooker in England where our No. 1 has been suspended pending investigation.

gilbis
http://www.snookercoaching.limewebs.com/

It's funny you should bring this up. Pool has a considerably worse reputation than snooker. In fact, snooker has always had a reputation as a game for gentlemen and many of us were a little surprised at the current scandal with Higgins.

Pool has always been the "bad boy" sport. There isn't much money in pool. Since there is very little official bookmaging wagering on pool games, it has mostly occured in other ways.

- Part of pool hustling has always been "dumping". Dumping is when a "backer' is talked into staking a player in a gambling match. The players agree which opponent will win, and split the money up afterwards.

- Another tactic is "steering" - where a player is set up in a bad gambling match, and whoever does the steering is getting paid.

- Part of tournament pool is "savers", where players agree to split 1st and 2nd place prize money, regardless of outcome. This is not considered a corrupt thing, but a necessity of staying on the tournament circuit.

- Some tournament matches have been rigged as Cree-Do pointed out, where bet making used to take place. In the one case there were multiple players involved and it was also an unsuual tournament format where "winner takes all" - generally a bad idea for a pool tournament and encourages this sort of thing.

What's sad is, many of the people who play pool at the top level are really good, decent people, but they are desparate.

Chris
 
Last edited:
Back
Top