I thought other years the Expo event was always single elimination, did they change it ???
... If a U.S. guy wins the WPA World 9-Ball Title he would get no points for the win, or any other World Championship Events. Except the U.S. Open 9-Ball
So basically if a U.S. guy wins a BAR BOX tournament they get points !!! But I guess Matchroom doesn't expect a U.S. guy to win any of the
"World Series" events, besides the U.S. Open 9-Ball which I'd guess they'd have to, as an American won it the last 3 years. The other 'World Series"
events aren't even listed as points events for the American players.
Basically Matchroom is pushing an American player to play in a BAR BOX event over, say, going for a WPA World 10-Ball Title. Such as in the events that just finished.
This, by the manner, they are allocating U.S. MC points.
If a US player won the WPA 9-ball event I don't see how they couldn't get picked as a wild card...Not to worry. They have allowed 3 USA players to qualify without ever setting foot outside the USA. But it's a 5-man team. If any USA player doesn't make the top 3 in the USA events, but does well in big events outside the USA, that will bolster his credentials for one of the other two picks.
Hold on, are they using two totally separate tournament listings for the two groups so if one group does well in a tournament listed for the other group they get no points for them?
If Shane happens to be visiting Holland to get his wooden shoes repaired and wins their national title, he gets 0 points but if Neils wins it he gets points? Or if a UK guy wins the US Open, no points for them?
WTF?
Who sorted out which is a lesser tournament? Did they ever see who plays in DCC or any of the other tournaments? You have to beat the same guys that you would in the US Open. Heck, I've seen regional tournaments like the Joss Tour have Stickland, Dechaine, Shaw, Immonen, Sossei and a handfull of other top players play in them.
Matchroom doesn't have to push that, it's the way things already are. I can imagine the whining if Matchroom only counted WPA events for US points. There would be really only one that more than a handful of top U.S. players attend.Basically Matchroom is pushing an American player to play in a BAR BOX event over, say, going for a WPA World 10-Ball Title. Such as in the events that just finished.
This, by the manner, they are allocating U.S. MC points.
Not to worry. They have allowed 3 USA players to qualify without ever setting foot outside the USA. But it's a 5-man team. If any USA player doesn't make the top 3 in the USA events, but does well in big events outside the USA, that will bolster his credentials for one of the other two picks.
Right, and let's state the obvious: Shane is the only likely US contender to win a big tourney outside the U.S. like the World 9-ball, and he's going to finish at or near the top of the U.S. list anyway.
@ ATLARGE - what are his stats @ one-on-one, vs team?
Shane's Mosconi Cup record for his 8 appearances -- 2007-2014:
• Counting a full win or loss for each player in a doubles' match (i.e., not splitting the point into halves or thirds), and a win and a loss for everyone in a team match (i.e., not splitting the point into fifths or sixths): 9-12 singles, 9-10 doubles, 3-5 teams, 21-27 total (winning percentage of 44%)
• Counting a full point for each player in a singles win or loss, a half a point for each player in a doubles win or loss, and one-fifth of a point for each player in a team win or loss: 14.1 - 18.0 (winning percentage 44%)
thank you - that told me nothing, Honey.i didn't know this would involve math....
EDIT - i just reread this - is he better playing alone? or same as a team?
thank you - that told me nothing, Honey.i didn't know this would involve math....
EDIT - i just reread this - is he better playing alone? or same as a team?
Singles -- he has won 9 out of 21 matches = 43% wins
Doubles -- he has been on the winning side in 9 out of 19 matches = 47%
Teams -- he has been on the winning side in 3 out of 8 matches = 38%
Singles + Doubles + Teams -- he has been on the winning side in 21 of 48 matches = 44%
thank you, both. :smile:
so i did read it right - i just couldn't believe it. it blew the whole theory that Shane doesn't perform as well on Mosconi, as he does on his own.
thank you for your help.
thank you, both. :smile:
so i did read it right - i just couldn't believe it. it blew the whole theory that Shane doesn't perform as well on Mosconi, as he does on his own.
thank you for your help.
I think you read it wrong-All and all SVB in the MC, whether alone or with a partner(s), wins around 45% of his matches. In the US Open the last few years he wins 100%, 97% ? something like that. In other tournies, he certainly averages WELL above 45%.