yea in other countries players work hard for the fame and money in pool. but not in the u.s.a. they can get good with training and practice and against each other devoting their whole life to it..
but here there is little incentive to get good enough to become a great player so the pool of players that get good enough say 700 or so to advance to super pro status, is very small. and many already make more at other things then they can ever make playing in pool tournaments and having to travel.
i know 5 700 plus players that rarely play now and play cards or have a higher paying job.
and yes i am still in the decades past and have the experience of it to compare.
and there were hundreds and hundreds of players that could work a little and play top pro speed. maybe not filler speed but better or as good as the entries in the tournaments that are not dead money.
and if the ouschans were able to make hundreds of thousands playing poker or working in tech then you can bet your sweet a-- they would be doing that instead, and never got great.
gross working average wages in the u.s. are 30% higher than europe let alone asia. and the europeans pay much higher taxes on theirs so their purchasing power is way below the u.s. so pool winnings go alot farther there as it can bring them into middle class..
I do understand that it’s not worth it to play pool. I agree with it.
I don’t think that it was ever worth it.
Most people get into pool because they like playing it, not because there might be a big payday one day.
Some people are getting better at it then others. Some are getting really good, far better than most.
At this point a player faces two options:
1. Play great at an amateur level, maybe a money game here and there and get a good steady job.
2. Explore just how good one can get, how far can he take it.
It’s a big dilemma, especially when knowing that it’s a field that there is no money in it.
This dilemma is not unique to pool, there are many other hobbies that turning pro put this dilemma in play (I know that I was there in other field, pool was always an amateur thing for me so no dilemma there)
If someone chooses to go the second way, than I guess there are many routes to try, depending on where you live, the local culture, the ability to support yourself etc.
I’m not here to debate whether American players should choose one way or the other.
I’m simply explaining why those who do choose the second option fail to reach the highest levels.
It doesn’t matter if they can’t or won’t do what it takes, they have their reasons.
I believe that it’s a waste of time and energy and money to choose the second option and don’t do what needs to be done, might as well choose option one.