Mike dechaine vs an apa 9 …

The point is, the 7 is not really a 7, he's inflated his ranking by only playing opponents they know they can beat. It's cherry picking, they will never shoot anyone they know they can't handle. This in turn raises their ranking to an undeserved level, because their win rate is high. They actually might be a 5 or less. That's why I stated, there's a huge difference between a 9 and a 9. Brian.
I suppose it's like a vanity handicap in golf. Less common than sandbagging, but some people like a number they really don't deserve.
 
The point is, the 7 is not really a 7, he's inflated his ranking by only playing opponents they know they can beat. It's cherry picking, they will never shoot anyone they know they can't handle. This in turn raises their ranking to an undeserved level, because their win rate is high. They actually might be a 5 or less. That's why I stated, there's a huge difference between a 9 and a 9. Brian.
You'll have that in a small town with no sheriff.
 
An APA anything is further from a pro than a fetus that is thinking about playing someday.
There are some 700s who play APA. Abrin Schaad is 756. 1 point higher than Rodney Morris.

Why they bother playing APA with Fargos that high, I do not know. But they exist.

A guy in my area used to play APA and he's a flat 700. He will go deep in regional tournaments but inevitably match up against the Sky Woodwards of the world and lose 11-4 or something like that.
 
if he was an apa 9 then apa must go to 20 or something for the top players in the league.

ratings are ridiculous.
Easy there. Both Rodney and I are from that area, and historically the APA players from there that have gone to Las Vegas have been accused of being underrated. Plus Roy is a Master Instructor in the area, so there has been an increase in average skill level for North Worcester County.

Any 650 is going to look like dog $hit against an 800 player. In a race to 7, you can expect a 650 to win 2.7 games. James got a brutal scratch on one of his breaks, and yes playing against an 800 is going to give you mental issues.
 
The guy in the video says someone there invented it but I saw that like 30 years ago at the club lol it’s to stop the roll marks balls make when you load the rack and roll it forward. You put that under the rack . Put the balls in and when you roll the rack forward that rolls out the back.
Loads of Uk bar tables have this
 
i just saw the shots he missed and by how much. and how his position wasnt very good. as well as his break shots were terrible.

of course he isnt a pro but certainly should have played much better for having a top ranking in his league rating.

that was my position on the rankings.
 
The point is, the 7 is not really a 7, he's inflated his ranking by only playing opponents they know they can beat. It's cherry picking, they will never shoot anyone they know they can't handle. This in turn raises their ranking to an undeserved level, because their win rate is high. They actually might be a 5 or less. That's why I stated, there's a huge difference between a 9 and a 9. Brian.
Like all league players....fish in small ponds....legends in their own minds.
 
This was from before 2020, he isn't necessarily playing again.

Shame, he is much funner to watch than most of today's robots.
Archer was the one that led the campaign to get Mike out of pool...and look how Johnny turned out.
 
There are some 700s who play APA. Abrin Schaad is 756. 1 point higher than Rodney Morris.

Why they bother playing APA with Fargos that high, I do not know. But they exist.

A guy in my area used to play APA and he's a flat 700. He will go deep in regional tournaments but inevitably match up against the Sky Woodwards of the world and lose 11-4 or something like that.
A 756??
Beating housewives?
That is ridiculous.
 
IMG_1638.jpeg

BEHOLD!
 
I hope he does well, but I’m not optimistic. I know his Fargo is ~800 but can’t imagine he’s a top 10-15 player in the United States right now. I watched him play Roland Garcia at the DCC (can’t remember if it was this year or last year) and he got destroyed. One bad roll led to a bad miss or two which led to him going completely off the rails.

Love watching him play and I do think he’s definitely one of our most talented, I just question whether he has the humility and maturity to get the game straightened out.
 
See if he can do it without being a colossal asswipe. He's got the chops for sure, maybe he's grown up some. Still like SVB to 'horse-f^&k' him again if they tee it up. ;)
 
A few weeks ago he was supposed to be playing a doubles match against two locals here that are both in the 650's, and for the life of me I can't remember who was gonna be his partner. Gonna have to ask how that turned out...

I've told the story before, Mike came to our APA night one time a few years ago, doing challenge matches and stuff. It was a fun night.
For $20, he'd have to win 9 games, to you making ONE ball. He got the break, racked his own, magic rack, 9' Diamond. He'd run out, or stitch the player so bad, it was hilarious. The one time that I was watching where he coulda lost, he left a moderate cut shot, not a gimmie, but not crazy, to a player who probably would make that shot 6 times out of 10. He was so nerved up, actually having a chance, that he practically miscued, botched it big time. We all broke out laughing, shooter included.

I hope he does get back into it more.
 
The point is, the 7 is not really a 7, he's inflated his ranking by only playing opponents they know they can beat. It's cherry picking, they will never shoot anyone they know they can't handle. This in turn raises their ranking to an undeserved level, because their win rate is high. They actually might be a 5 or less. That's why I stated, there's a huge difference between a 9 and a 9. Brian.
APA skill level is based more on innings than it is on win percentage. So only playing matches they know they will win will only increase their skill level if they are shooting low innings
 
Back
Top