rangelsammon
Member
Best NOT viewed on mobile. desktop computer preferred.
just hard to navigate without desktop.
just hard to navigate without desktop.
Looks like a play by play, its this the initial version or final draft for future stats?
Great work. Data entry for pool scoring is something that interests me
Also ill add, this is the future of pool stats. matchroom stats provided are snooker stats. long pots? gtfo
As a pool room regular having people input data is the big problem for leagues or tournaments.
I am interested in streamlining that input process. The idea is to give users a way to share stats from watching matches.
It is easier to share data if that process can be done by any computer or mobile user. Some leagues have apps for scoring but they are clunky.
so many possibilities. even betting companiesshot accuracy, breaking success and safety success is all that is needed on TV. and TPA is good enough. the other stats you'd be better of selling to the players or their managers.
successful safe - are yiu referring to the play by play? i really need to rid those words. thats all they are. it was early on then i started only counting off for safe if the opponent pocketed a ball.What is your criteria for a successful safe? I see successful safes followed by a pocketed ball and unsuccessful safes that were resafed back and resafed again. I guess it's a bit of a nebulous concept, if we are exchanging safties, but neither of us is giving up shots nor getting ball in hand, are they successful?
I liked the angle and distance for the made shots in the shot accuracy chart. It would be nice to see 4/4 instead of 100%, I don't know how many shots were attempted at a particular distance/angle. It is nice to see that the majority of shots were half ball or greater and less than three diamonds from the pocket. That lets me know if I am taking a lot of thinner and longer shots I need to work on my position play.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaay too much. I doubt 1% of people that play/watch pool care about any of this.TMI. Distill.
Agreed. Overkill at minimum.TMI. Distill.
id rather give it and find what works then give it and say thats it. lets open the flood gates lolTMI. Distill.
i find more people interested in this info. You see how many people play fantasy sports?Waaaaaaaaaaaaay too much. I doubt 1% of people that play/watch pool care about any of this.
Its just not for youAgreed. Overkill at minimum.
I'm a box score guy but this is the equivalent of the "he's 0-27 on Tuesday night games played in the month of May facing left handed relievers on the West Coast" kind of stat. Some stats can be meaningless and irrelevant.Its just not for youbut others love it. It tells a story. Like the old days looking at a box score with stats in the sports day of a newspaper
Raw data doesn't tell a story - summaries tell stories. The box score and player game statistics are summaries.Its just not for youbut others love it. It tells a story. Like the old days looking at a box score with stats in the sports day of a newspaper