Naysayers Unnite pt2

duckie

GregH
Silver Member
Don't know why this thread was not moved to the aiming section when it was created but I figure its a good time to bump it to see what was stated in the past and use this thread to add anything new to point out the CTE BS.

http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=213716

If you have anything positive to say about CTE....start your on thread.....don't want to hear it in this thread since it would be off topic.

All the CTE proponents just stay away. This thread is not for your BS about how great CTE and anything.
 
CTE is terrible for anyone looking for a magic bullet. Those who are not true students of the game should never try to learn CTE as it is way too complicated for anyone not willing to put in the time.

I highly recommend that those people who don't like accurate aiming methods should stick to whatever Duckie says to do. His list of credentials as a player are way longer than Stan's and all the certified instructors that do teach CTE and related methods. He won't provide that list on here but I am sure he will be happy to share them in private.
 
I don't know why anyone would want to identify themselves as a "naysayer". It is perfectly natural when something does not make sense to you, or doesn't work for you, to be sceptical about it. The scepticism also tends to get triggered by over-the-top claims and bullying tactics often being employed.

Bully tactics by believers:

1. Challenges to play. It's stupid to ask some run of the mill forum guy to play a pro to prove his point. Aiming is a very, very small part of pool. Most people know how to aim to some extent, and the difference made by "better" aiming is miniscule if you are not a top shooter. That is to say, for a run of the mill amateur, the misses will be caused by stroke or alignment, unless you are a complete beginner.
2. Constant prying for personal information. This is a big red flag. I'd advice anyone against giving their name on this forum. One of the forum people got raided by authorities after another guy turned him in for running his business out of his garage. The douchiest forum move of ALL time. That same guy is completely relentless and will not quit. There have also been threats to peoples lives. Stay anonymous, stay safe.
3. Flat out stating that someone is wrong, then acting as if that has been proven by the mere fact of stating it. Then making fun of that person based on an assertion that has not been proven.
4. Blaming failure to comprehend on stupidity of the student, when in fact lots of people have the same exact problem with the material.
5. Namecalling. Over and over and over.
6. Constantly asking for censorship of "non-believers". Calls for them to be "muzzled" etc. Also calls for the forum to be "cleansed", whatever they mean by that.

Being disgusted by these tactics and baffled by certain claims, should not be grounds for being labled a "naysayer".
 
Last edited:
I don't know why anyone would want to identify themselves as a "naysayer". It is perfectly natural when something does not make sense to you, or doesn't work for you, to be sceptical about it. The scepticism also tends to get triggered by over-the-top claims and bullying tactics often being employed.

Bully tactics by believers:

1. Challenges to play. It's stupid to ask some run of the mill forum guy to play a pro to prove his point. Aiming is a very, very small part of pool. Most people know how to aim to some extent, and the difference made by "better" aiming is miniscule if you are not a top shooter. That is to say, for a run of the mill amateur, the misses will be caused by stroke or alignment, unless you are a complete beginner.
2. Constant prying for personal information. This is a big red flag. I'd advice anyone against giving their name on this forum. One of the forum people got raided by authorities after another guy turned him in for running his business out of his garage. The douchiest forum move of ALL time. That same guy is completely relentless and will not quit. There have also been threats to peoples lives. Stay anonymous, stay safe.
3. Flat out stating that someone is wrong, then acting as if that has been proven by the mere fact of stating it. Then making fun of that person based on an assertion that has not been proven.
4. Blaming failure to comprehend on stupidity of the student, when in fact lots of people have the same exact problem with the material.
5. Namecalling. Over and over and over.
6. Constantly asking for censorship of "non-believers". Calls for them to be "muzzled" etc. Also calls for the forum to be "cleansed", whatever they mean by that.

Being disgusted by these tactics and baffled by certain claims, should not be grounds for being labled a "naysayer".

Fantastic post.

Who is the no. 2 (pun included)?

Oh, and as for the anonymous thing, I'd relieve barton of his cash in an instant if i didn't know he's doing it solely to bait me into given him my real name and address. Once he had those, he'd bail faster than someone saying "what's that? Barton's crawfished again? Quelle surprise".

He's obsessed.
 
Last edited:
Here's a better challenge .
Grab a couple of APA 3's.
Teach them for year then let them play each other.
 
I don't know why anyone would want to identify themselves as a "naysayer". It is perfectly natural when something does not make sense to you, or doesn't work for you, to be sceptical about it. The scepticism also tends to get triggered by over-the-top claims and bullying tactics often being employed.

Bully tactics by believers:

1. Challenges to play. It's stupid to ask some run of the mill forum guy to play a pro to prove his point. Aiming is a very, very small part of pool. Most people know how to aim to some extent, and the difference made by "better" aiming is miniscule if you are not a top shooter. That is to say, for a run of the mill amateur, the misses will be caused by stroke or alignment, unless you are a complete beginner.

Actually challenges to play come from both sides. Aiming is a big deal, a very very very big part of the process since being aimed wrong screws everything else up that follows.


2. Constant prying for personal information. This is a big red flag. I'd advice anyone against giving their name on this forum. One of the forum people got raided by authorities after another guy turned him in for running his business out of his garage. The douchiest forum move of ALL time. That same guy is completely relentless and will not quit. There have also been threats to peoples lives. Stay anonymous, stay safe.

On the flip side anons have made slanderous comments and accusations and have zero accountability for that. IF a person knows they are likely to be sued or popped in the mouth they are less likely to go off with lies about someone else.

3. Flat out stating that someone is wrong, then acting as if that has been proven by the mere fact of stating it. Then making fun of that person based on an assertion that has not been proven.

You mean the way Duckie makes statements of fact about how CTE doesn't work and is useless etc....???


4. Blaming failure to comprehend on stupidity of the student, when in fact lots of people have the same exact problem with the material.

Um, nope, those who have success are ALWAYS willing to help those who genuinely want to learn figure it out. But a lot of the time the statements run the lines of, "I tried this last night and it's gibberish therefore it doesn't work...."

5. Namecalling. Over and over and over.

Like, "snake-oil salesman", con-artist, religious nut, delusional, banger, two-bit coward, etc....names like that???

6. Constantly asking for censorship of "non-believers". Calls for them to be "muzzled" etc. Also calls for the forum to be "cleansed", whatever they mean by that.

I will state for the record that I want EVERY SINGLE NAYSAYER barred from constantly poisoning the discussions. In real life if people are trying to have a positive conversation disruptive people are removed and I see it being no different here. You can start your own contrary discussion if you like and INVITE people to debate you. But don't jump into every discussion where people are just trying to work out the methods and poison it with negativity.

Being disgusted by these tactics and baffled by certain claims, should not be grounds for being labled a "naysayer".

Don't act like all this has no precedent. Going all the way back to RSB the dynamic has ALWAYS been that a person tries to present a method to help players improve and certain people try to knock the method and anyone who uses and promotes it.

IF people were allowed to present their methods without getting trolled then those discussions would result in short threads among pool nerds who like to play around with alternative methods. But trolls turn the discussions into flamewars resulting in both sides digging in.
 
Fantastic post.

Who is the no. 2 (pun included)?

Oh, and as for the anonymous thing, I'd relieve barton of his cash in an instant if i didn't know he's doing it solely to bait me into given him my real name and address. Once he had those, he'd bail faster than someone saying "what's that? Barton's crawfished again? Quelle surprise".

He's obsessed.

Right, you can't run three balls on any table. At this moment you are only some anon posting who can't prove that he even plays pool or snooker.
 
Right, you can't run three balls on any table. At this moment you are only some anon posting who can't prove that he even plays pool or snooker.

Can so. Running 3 balls is easy, done it loads of times.

:rolleyes:

Talking of piss easy challenges even you could do, where's that video of you almost running 10 racks of 4 ball? That was a good one.

Anyways you has your chance and blew it. If only you had the, ahem, time to register on TSF! Ten dollars AND my name & address - sweeeeeeet.
 
Can so. Running 3 balls is easy, done it loads of times.

:rolleyes:

Talking of piss easy challenges even you could do, where's that video of you almost running 10 racks of 4 ball? That was a good one.

Anyways you has your chance and blew it. If only you had the, ahem, time to register on TSF! Ten dollars AND my name & address - sweeeeeeet.
I am registered on tsf. Been there for years

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
 
Bully tactics by believers:

1. Challenges to play. It's stupid to ask some run of the mill forum guy to play a pro to prove his point. Aiming is a very, very small part of pool. Most people know how to aim to some extent, and the difference made by "better" aiming is miniscule if you are not a top shooter. That is to say, for a run of the mill amateur, the misses will be caused by stroke or alignment, unless you are a complete beginner.
2. Constant prying for personal information. This is a big red flag. I'd advice anyone against giving their name on this forum. One of the forum people got raided by authorities after another guy turned him in for running his business out of his garage. The douchiest forum move of ALL time. That same guy is completely relentless and will not quit. There have also been threats to peoples lives. Stay anonymous, stay safe.
3. Flat out stating that someone is wrong, then acting as if that has been proven by the mere fact of stating it. Then making fun of that person based on an assertion that has not been proven.
4. Blaming failure to comprehend on stupidity of the student, when in fact lots of people have the same exact problem with the material.
5. Namecalling. Over and over and over.
6. Constantly asking for censorship of "non-believers". Calls for them to be "muzzled" etc. Also calls for the forum to be "cleansed", whatever they mean by that.

Being disgusted by these tactics and baffled by certain claims, should not be grounds for being labled a "naysayer".

ROTFLMAO!! My side hurts from laughing so hard. This is straight out of the Naysayer Troll Handbook of Rules for all petrified anonymous naysayer trolls past, present, and future

I love #2, you guys have a real sense of humor or if it's not the case, then misinformation. Was the raid conducted by a fully dressed and armed SWAT TEAM? LMAO! How many different squad cars of police if it wasn't SWAT?

Police don't raid a house for working out of a garage unless the work is a Chop Shop, meth lab, marijuana greenhouse with grow lights, or some other criminal activity definitely known ahead of time and they'd need a warrant.

All businesses should have a business license mainly to have a record for the state to make sure the business is collecting sales tax and forwarding it to the state.

And there needs to be a county Occupational license for the type of business being operated at the house. Some counties have restrictions on the type of business but for the most part very lenient. And even IF the business owner is doing something in the garage not allowed under County law, they sure as hell don't raid the place with police. Some employee from the County might give a call over the phone to find out certain things but then let them know a different location is required.

Btw, everything you stated is a two way street with a few word changes by YOUR group of naysayer anonymous trolls with their actions but includes STALKING.
 
ROTFLMAO!! My side hurts from laughing so hard. This is straight out of the Naysayer Troll Handbook of Rules for all petrified anonymous naysayer trolls past, present, and future

I love #2, you guys have a real sense of humor or if it's not the case, then misinformation. Was the raid conducted by a fully dressed and armed SWAT TEAM? LMAO! How many different squad cars of police if it wasn't SWAT?

Police don't raid a house for working out of a garage unless the work is a Chop Shop, meth lab, marijuana greenhouse with grow lights, or some other criminal activity definitely known ahead of time and they'd need a warrant.

All businesses should have a business license mainly to have a record for the state to make sure the business is collecting sales tax and forwarding it to the state.

And there needs to be a county Occupational license for the type of business being operated at the house. Some counties have restrictions on the type of business but for the most part very lenient. And even IF the business owner is doing something in the garage not allowed under County law, they sure as hell don't raid the place with police. Some employee from the County might give a call over the phone to find out certain things but then let them know a different location is required.

Btw, everything you stated is a two way street with a few word changes by YOUR group of naysayer anonymous trolls with their actions but includes STALKING.

You've really got him banged to rights there.

:rolleyes:
 
Really? Never seen you. What's yer username and where are the aiming system shills?

No idea what an aiming system shill is. I promote aiming systems in discussions where it's appropriate on pool forums since I play pool and not snooker.

Snooker has plenty of coaches and instructors to help their students along. Using an aiming "system" isn't the only way to be successful on the table clearly. So unlike you I don't meddle in a forum that is dedicated to a game I don't play. At least I don't play it well and haven't really played for years.

We don't know if you even play any billiard sports.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (11).png
    Screenshot (11).png
    22.8 KB · Views: 241
No idea what an aiming system shill is. I promote aiming systems in discussions where it's appropriate on pool forums since I play pool and not snooker.

Snooker has plenty of coaches and instructors to help their students along. Using an aiming "system" isn't the only way to be successful on the table clearly. So unlike you I don't meddle in a forum that is dedicated to a game I don't play. At least I don't play it well and haven't really played for years.

We don't know if you even play any billiard sports.

Junior member? Have you even made a post?
 
The problem with CTE users is their believing their perception of the shot is the only right one.

Like using the edge of the ball......in their perception of the shot, there is a edge to use so they do.....in their mind. Another person, in their perception, there are no edges to use.

This difference in perception by each person of the same shot is why all aiming systems are subjective.

Perception is on a person by person basis.

I stated a long time ago that CTE was useless because it is limited in shots it can be used on, regardless what is stated, is not a accurate aiming system, to hard to learn and provides no means to help in adjusting.

I've been proven right numberous times. Like every time there is a CTE thread.

It's the worst system out there.
 
Here's a better challenge .
Grab a couple of APA 3's.
Teach them for year then let them play each other.

I had hoped a relatively new player a few years back would be able to give some fresh info on how the improvement went, but it didn't pan out. While the idea is good on paper, there are so many variables for the two low players that it would be difficult to pinpoint the real reason for improvement, especially at such a low level. A lot of this is like arguing beliefs. I don't like the marketing tactics, but I'm a hating, naysayer troll, so it just never ends. :shrug:
 
Don't know why this thread was not moved to the aiming section when it was created but I figure its a good time to bump it to see what was stated in the past and use this thread to add anything new to point out the CTE BS.

http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=213716

If you have anything positive to say about CTE....start your on thread.....don't want to hear it in this thread since it would be off topic.

All the CTE proponents just stay away. This thread is not for your BS about how great CTE and anything.

Someone showed me CTE and it seemed to be confusing and have aim gaps so I fixed it and now it works great. Never miss a ball kind of great.
 
The problem with CTE users is their believing their perception of the shot is the only right one.

Like using the edge of the ball......in their perception of the shot, there is a edge to use so they do.....in their mind. Another person, in their perception, there are no edges to use.

This difference in perception by each person of the same shot is why all aiming systems are subjective.

Perception is on a person by person basis.

I stated a long time ago that CTE was useless because it is limited in shots it can be used on, regardless what is stated, is not a accurate aiming system, to hard to learn and provides no means to help in adjusting.

I've been proven right numberous times. Like every time there is a CTE thread.

It's the worst system out there.

Here's what CTE users believe. The perceptions for any and ALL aiming systems are right as long as they WORK as good as you can make them work for your skill level.

CTE is not limited for any shot on the table, something you wouldn't know because you know zero about how to visualize or perform it.

The worst system out there is the one that makes you miss the most because you don't fully understand it, you never learned it, you devoted little time to practice the system, it's weaker than some other systems for various cut angles.

ALL aiming systems can work very well. Some aiming systems won't work very well or at all. It depends on the player himself/herself.

ALL CTE users have used many different aiming systems extremely well and not so well prior to CTE. NOBODY CONVERTED TO IT AND STUCK WITH IT BECAUSE THEY WANT TO SHOOT WORSE! What part of that doesn't register with you?
 
CTE sucks, plain and simple. Go start a thread on the positive aspects of it, but in this thread it sucks.

Show how it can offer feedback for adjustments. The only answer for a miss is, you didn't have the right perception. Great feedback there. No help in determining which way and how much to adjust.

It's a pocketing system only and not a ball placement system. It can't handle safety's. Don't care what you state. As described CTE can not be used for safety's where you are going for ball placement and not pocketing a ball.

Look at how much documentation has been needed to even try to explain it and it is still clear as mud. The only people that seem to get it to work consistently are those that already play at a high level. I really doubt these people truely use CTE at this level, even though they may think so. It's gonna be hard to overcome past successful experiences in shot making in Order to use CTe as described.

Any system that's is this hard to use, this hard to explain is useless. Give those DVD to a young kid just learning and see how long they will use them. They won't for very long.
 
Last edited:
I guess you really can't read and have a major deficiency in reading comprehension and are the one with CTE infiltrating your brain.

The post I made was about ANY AND ALL AIMING SYSTEMS. They can ALL BE GOOD, SOME CAN BE NOT AS GOOD, OTHERS NOT GOOD AT ALL. It all depends on the USER.

Again, what part of that isn't registering?
 
Back
Top