I don't know if this will work better than winner breaks, but i am sure it is better then alternate breaks. Might be a worthwile experiment which I once saw in a European tournement.
The format would be that as is always the case the one who wins the lag breaks. However from there on it would be the one who trails the match breaks. Whenever the match is tied the winner of the lag breaks. That gives the lag more meaning and makes matches much closer giving a higher chance of a hill - hill matchup.
If this happens then remember Sirus came up with it first
What u guys think?
The format would be that as is always the case the one who wins the lag breaks. However from there on it would be the one who trails the match breaks. Whenever the match is tied the winner of the lag breaks. That gives the lag more meaning and makes matches much closer giving a higher chance of a hill - hill matchup.
If this happens then remember Sirus came up with it first
What u guys think?