iusedtoberich said:Pigcarver: Have you ever played with a Predator? If so, which one (314 or Z)? How does the McDermot shaft compare to the Predator as far as deflection and action on the cue ball?
Thanks.
Hey. I've played with both of them. I've been much happier with the "feel" of the shaft. My biggest problem with both of the predator shafts is that I didn't have a certain type of responsiveness from the shaft. With the McDermott I get it.
As far as deflection goes, my test to see how much deflection I have to allowa for goes as this....Object ball against the rail 2 diamonds down from corner pocket, Cueball on the same side of the table, 2 diamonds up, one diamond over. (I hope I describe this right, this is all off the long rail). I hit the ball with extreme high left english with a speed to make the cueball travel 3-4 rails (playing shape back to where the cueball started). With my stroke, on a regular predator, I have to give about an 1/4 ball for deflection. With a z shaft, it's a little bit less, I would almost call it an 1/8 ball. With the Mc Dermott, it's fairly negligible (dare I say a 1/32 of a ball?). As far as action goes, the shaft has a fairly long taper (almost meucciesque if you will) so it moves the rock pretty good.
I've found so far (the last 2 days) that the shaft is pretty much built for my stroke (maybe it won't be so hot for you). I'm going to give it about 2 weeks, to see if it's just me being excited about having a new toy, and I am just hitting the balls really good (you know, all about the subconscious), or if the shaft is making a difference....we shall see.