cigardave said:One one hand, pool is what it is... and on the other, pool is what you make it.
BINGO
so why bash it ?..........

great post btw cigardave
cigardave said:One one hand, pool is what it is... and on the other, pool is what you make it.
mullyman said:They make this no name sound like he was the greatest that ever lived. They mention that he tutored Strickland. Didn't it say he was 20 at the time and Earl was 6 years younger than him? That would have put Earl at 14. Not impressed. Then he made the top 45 out of 200 in the US Open? Wow, he won like 2 or 3 matches. Whoopty doo! He probably played against no names.
Thanks for the read, Jam. Not knocking your end of it at all.
MULLY
mullyman said:They make this no name sound like he was the greatest that ever lived. They mention that he tutored Strickland. Didn't it say he was 20 at the time and Earl was 6 years younger than him? That would have put Earl at 14. Not impressed. Then he made the top 45 out of 200 in the US Open? Wow, he won like 2 or 3 matches. Whoopty doo! He probably played against no names.
Thanks for the read, Jam. Not knocking your end of it at all.
MULLY
poolhall maven said:it did harm, and it harms all of us who try to make a living from pool.
We didn't say it never happened, there are bad apples everywhere, we're just sick of it when that old stereotype is replayed over and over. No matter how hard we try, we are always pulled back into the gutter.
Not bad considering he only plays the monthly tournament at Breaktime and will generally go a month or two without hitting a ball.poolcuemaster said:Hey give Bullard some credit , he can play because he beat Allen Hopkins, Kieth Bennett and Mike Fuller this weekend among others in Wilmington NC.
He has to play pretty good to beat some of NC's best.--Leonard
DoomCue said:Anyone who knows Bruce and how he plays wouldn't think he's not a world-class player...I hate to see bull$h!t posts like the ones in this thread characterizing a man who doesn't deserve the negative criticism. If you don't know Bruce, and you can't tell the difference between what he said and what the author of the article said, then shut the f*ck up about Bruce. Take out your frustration about the sorry state of pool on the media and/or the leadership (or lack thereof) of professional pool - Bruce doesn't deserve to be the target.
-djb
There's no doubt in my mind that a stereotype is being perpetuated. That's been going on for decades. I, too, take exception to the terms in the article. I know, though, that's what the perception of our sport is, and I know the media has done, and will continue to do, its best to perpetuate that image. I have to wonder why it's ok to perpetuate that image for pool, even though there is a lot more robbing and hustling happening on the golf course than in any pool room. Unfortunately, the stereotype for pool, like most stereotypes, does have some basis in fact. I can hate the stereotype, and I can do what I can to dispel the myths and misinformation, but to some small extent, we poolplayers deserve it.JAM said:I was hoping somebody who actually knew Bruce Bullard would come on this thread. In fact, I think I actually posted that on this thread somewhere earlier.
Actually, I think this thread is very revealing about the American pool culture. I must say, though, I was pleasantly surprised to read the posts from members of this forum who found this phrase offensive. That gave me a little spark of sunshine! :smile:
If the author of the article did create that term "drunkards, druggies, and thieves," it speaks volumes about what this American media person thought of pool when he was interviewing Bruce Bullard. Can somebody say "STEREOTYPE"?
When I was younger, all of the pool rooms in my area never served alcohol. The only places that served alcohol were the bars, but the bars usually only had one or two pool tables, unlike the rest of the country.
When I went on the road in the '70s down South and entered the bars with 20 and 30 pool tables in them, I thought I had died and went to heaven. I loved it down South, and the pool action was plentiful. :grin:
The person I was on the road with who was THE pool player looking for action tended to never want to gamble in the bars. He wanted to stick with the pool rooms. He knew that gambling and alcohol didn't mix, and he was right. I soon found that out when I had a gun pulled on me in Dalton, Georgia, side-betting.
My last road trip came about because of an incident that happened in Rome, Georgia. We went into this joint, looking for action, and the bartender called in the local champ. This older man, maybe in his forties -- hey, forties was old to me back then :grin: -- came to play, with his stick in tow, and it was let the games begin, with the two players sparring, giving it their all.
When the dust settled, my friend won the cheese. As we were exiting the premises with our pockets full of the other man's cash, I saw that 40-ish man sitting outside on the ground by his car, weeping his eyes out. I never went on the road again hustling pool after that incident. To this day, I can't get that sight out of my mind of that man crying in the parking lot.
That's not to say I don't like action. I still enjoy a good game of high stakes, but I prefer it to be a fair contest. Okay, okay. I'll admit that I somewhat do like it better when my horse has the best of it. :grin:
Today in the year 2008, I have seen both sides of pool, the action genre and the tournament soldier era. Those are the two subcultures within American pool, and they each have their warts and shining stars. :wink:
JAM
JAM said:When the dust settled, my friend won the cheese. As we were exiting the premises with our pockets full of the other man's cash, I saw that 40-ish man sitting outside on the ground by his car, weeping his eyes out. I never went on the road again hustling pool after that incident. To this day, I can't get that sight out of my mind of that man crying in the parking lot.
JAM
DoomCue said:This site is really going downhill. All the threads about various players, tours, cuemakers, etc., have nothing but negativity in them (granted, some of it is richly deserved), and I for one and becoming more and more sick of it. Normally, I could care less since I have no vested interest in most of these threads, but this particular thread really pisses me off (that's not a reflection on you, Jennie - I'm taking exception to the sucker punchers hiding behind screen names who don't know what they hell they're talking about). For people to take potshots at a guy they don't even know is ludicrous, but to base such stupidity on a podunk small-town newspaper article takes that to a level of just plain retarded. Unfortunately, that's become de rigeur here on AZBilliards.
The line about "drunkards, druggies, and thieves" isn't a direct quote from Bruce Bullard. That is a characterization from the author of the article. If you anonymous Internet sucker punchers have an opinion about that line, send your anonymous sucker punch to the author of the article - don't post your retarded conjecture and assumptions about Bruce here on AZBilliards.
Anyone who knows Bruce and how he plays wouldn't think he's not a world-class player. When Tony Watson lived in Wilmington, Bruce beat Tony plenty of times in tournaments. I've been a personal witness to a few of these matches. I also have been a victim of Bruce's. I've been goose-egged twice in my life. Once was right after I broke my collarbone to a guy whom I'd feel comfortable giving the 7-out. I don't like to count that one, but it did happen. Anyway, the only other time was to Bruce, and I never missed a ball. He won the lag and ran out the set on one of Breaktime's Diamond Pros (the Camel Pro Billiard Tour one, actually). The only times I got out of the chair were to rack and to shake Bruce's hand. At the time, I didn't know who he was. I got a chance to talk to him after that match, and he struck me as being a really nice guy. I've talked to him a few more times since then (but I haven't seen him in a few years since I don't make my way down to Wilmington very often anymore). He's a family man with a full-time job, and he doesn't spend every waking moment in a pool room. He's humble and down-to-Earth. I've seen him get pissed off - he's not perfect and he's no angel. He'll often go weeks or months without hitting a ball, but he still snaps off tournaments. He's one of the best players in NC, and he'd be more well-known if he didn't rarely play outside of Wilmington. Make no mistake, the man is a PLAYER.
I hate to see bull$h!t posts like the ones in this thread characterizing a man who doesn't deserve the negative criticism. If you don't know Bruce, and you can't tell the difference between what he said and what the author of the article said, then shut the f*ck up about Bruce. Take out your frustration about the sorry state of pool on the media and/or the leadership (or lack thereof) of professional pool - Bruce doesn't deserve to be the target.
-djb