sjm said:
I'd have to say that at world class level, straight pool without tight pockets is far less fascinating. If a world straight pool champion is to be crowned, it should be on tight pocket equipment.
QUOTE]
SJM,
What are you, some kind of sadist? If anybody sees me playing 14.1 on a real tight pocket table, they would laugh their a##es off. I finally convince myself that I've improved all the way up to well below average (on medium pocket tables) and you come up with another roadblock on the path to self esteem. - oh well, I'm married, I guess I can take a little more humiliation and belittling.
I guess I will have to support your idea, but I would go even a little further and suggest they play on slower cloth as well (so the rack doesn't fall apart everytime someone sneezes; a suggestion from Jim Rempe).
Rempe tired of one of the Adams cues with which he had competed, and sold it to me used for $75 during the 1980 World 14.1 Championships. Though it was never my favorite playing cue, it was a nice cue, and it broke my heart when it was stolen in 1998.
Jimmy's right to a point, as the game would have to be played on something a little slower than simonis 860 to be comparable to the game the old masters use to play. Still, how could you logically ask the top pros today to play on anything but simonis 860? I think you'd scare away more than a few potential entrants. Trust me, Willie, tighten the pockets and you'll make 100-ball runs rare again, even on the fast cloth.
Finally, I think your view on whether tight pocket equipment would be a good thing if
YOU were competing in a World Straight Pool Championship needs revision. Think of it this way, if you drew a John Schmidt or a Tony Robles, at least you'd probably get a few turns on the way to 150 if the pockets were tight. Loosen the pockets and those two will give you some painfully long trips to the chair.