Okay here's the Question, I'm refereeing a Tournament Yesterday.
Player 1 Breaks, he Breaks Dry.
Player 2 Approaches surveys table layout has a difficult hit but possible, rather than making the legal hit and opening up the table. Player 2 proceeds to call safe, hit a non legal OB, nothing hits a rail, and leaves the legal OB tied up without any possible means of being contacted without a Bad Hit occurring.
So Because Player 2 Called Safe and not Push, Player 1 said that it was not legal. I concurred with Player 1, and awarded a BIH Foul to Player 1.
Player 2 proceeded to argue that calling safe and executing a push in that situation was the same thing.
I told him that a Safe is a Safe, and a Push is a Push, and that the correct call has to be made.
What do yo guy's think?
Mind you had we a accepted it as a Push he still wouldn't have had a possible shot had Player 1 simply passed it back. So in my mind he was playing a safe to begin with, trying to combine what was legal and not legal.
Black Cat?
Player 1 Breaks, he Breaks Dry.
Player 2 Approaches surveys table layout has a difficult hit but possible, rather than making the legal hit and opening up the table. Player 2 proceeds to call safe, hit a non legal OB, nothing hits a rail, and leaves the legal OB tied up without any possible means of being contacted without a Bad Hit occurring.
So Because Player 2 Called Safe and not Push, Player 1 said that it was not legal. I concurred with Player 1, and awarded a BIH Foul to Player 1.
Player 2 proceeded to argue that calling safe and executing a push in that situation was the same thing.
I told him that a Safe is a Safe, and a Push is a Push, and that the correct call has to be made.
What do yo guy's think?
Mind you had we a accepted it as a Push he still wouldn't have had a possible shot had Player 1 simply passed it back. So in my mind he was playing a safe to begin with, trying to combine what was legal and not legal.
Black Cat?