Here's the silly notion about cues......everyone of us has opinions about what's the best cue, the greatest cue-maker or our own skill levels.
We render opinions about pool cues we don't own and may never own and we base it purely on a photo all too often. I have never played with a Danny Tibbits cue or even held one but based upon everything I've seen or read, he is a very talented cue-maker, one of the greats from what I hear.
Joel Hercek is probably my favorite cue-maker but I've never played with one of his cues....so what makes him so great....his reputation and who trained and taught him cue-building.....that's why......but I've never played with one of his cues. Yet I'm inclined to praise his cues when I see them on the Forum but I have never owned a cue by Joel Hercek and it's unlikely I ever will because the ones I want are all $6-8k and I won't spend more than $3500 for a cue.....that's the limit I set and I am not going to change at this stage in life.
My point is sometimes the opinion is based on fact or maybe firsthand experience and therefore, the opinion has a lot more validity. And sometimes the opinion is based upon hearsay, what we've heard or read what others post or maybe it's just our gut reaction to how a cue looks. Regardless, everyone is entitled to an opinion of course but here's the catch.........not every opinion is worth having .......especially when the opinion opines something the poster has no firsthand experience with..........it's based upon just their emotions.....ergo, the opinion is pretty worthless and totally without any value whatsoever.
Sadly, there's way too much negative opinion rendering on the Forum by persons that have zero knowledge about the topic or matter under discussion........those are the morons I was referring to in my earlier post about driving by the accident on the highway. If they can't talk smack or shit, they're out of their true element.