I agree. I don't believe low deflection shafts are better, they are just different. I have one and played with it for a while but changing decades of ingrained muscle memory to adjust didn't work well for me. I'm too old to reinvent my game. I'm happy with my regular maple shafts.I've been playing standard Maple shafts for 60 years.
why change?
Same here in 12.5. I don't own a black shaft, glove, or retractable chalk holder on my belt.12.7mm, standard maple, ivory ferrules.
There are some shots where I appreciate a little more deflection.
I started with one close to that and a bad installer made it a 12.5mm back in the 90s. I've used the same rock hard maple shaft since then but recently got a hsunami kielwood shaft and I love it. It's hard to explain, it's LD, but it feels much more like a regular shaft. It has the right feel and rigidity. I mean, it is solid maple, just baked in the kiln so no wonder it feels similar. To someone that doesn't give two rips about LD, this is a very nice shaft and much easier to adapt to than the whippy LD shafts I had tried in the past. I'm not even a fan of the wooden sectioned shafts (like the pie shaped ones predator does) but this kielwood is quite a player. It seems to take the half masse shots I throw at it and super thin cuts with outside that gave me fits on a whippier LD shaft I tried in the past.Just curious how many people still use the old style 13mm shafts that
are stiff and not low deflection
retractable chalk holder is a 2 ball improvement ..........Same here in 12.5. I don't own a black shaft, glove, or retractable chalk holder on my belt.