What is it about the template racks that makes them wrong for the game?
JoeyA
The same thing that was wrong with the Sardo rack, pattern racking and all the other little tricks and gaffs that have been discovered about breaking these last however many years. While intention behind these racks are innocent, the reality of the outcome is not.
Racking is supposed to be random, both in order of the balls in the rack and the outcome of the spread. Sardo racks, and template racks, take away quite a bit of the randomness to the spread, add to that pattern racking.... And you are setting up a drill type situation with very similar patterns/layout. At the lower amateur levels this isnt as big of an impact, as the breaker might not be able to give a repeatable break stroke. As skill level increases and especially at the pro level, its a joke IMO.
Years back there were some known rack mechanics, and they were looked at by their competitors as jackasses and cheats. Nowadays tournament promoters have bowed down to the players and allowed rule changes to reward the same behavior that was considered by most to be cheating 20+ years ago. A bunch of it started with rack your own, which in any games other than one pocket and 8 ball is a recipe for disaster. And it was allowed because tournament promoters didnt stand up to the whiners and lay down the law about "checking the rack", and demanding multiple reracks until they had the gaps they were happy with. So lets make a rack that gives as tight a pack as possible. Good thought, even playing field and all. But that was quickly discovered to be a problem back from the earliest Sardo days when the wing ball flew in every time and the spread was repeatable.
I liken it to allowing a baseball pitcher to keep an emory board and a jar of vaseline on them at all times while on the mound. Allowing false starts on the line of scrimmage. Etc etc etc. With pool it seems to be ok with some based on the "if everyone else is doing it" mentality. Quite frankly, IMO its cheating, cut and dry. Always has been, always will be. Why on earth, with a game that is already failing, would promoting ways of cheating or to put it milder.... taking advantage of poorly written rules, be the right thing for the future of the game? Its not, all it does is placate cheaters and whiners.
Ill finish my thought by repeating.... The rack and the spread are supposed to be random. That worked fine for years. Change it for the whiners? I say no.
Chuck