MacGyver said:He was down 4-1, and he knows how well Hendry was playing.
If he knew he just didn't have it that day, then what is the point in playing the other 5 games if he knew on that day he would lose?
If he is payed a salary then I can understand the "paying fans" angle, but if this was a tournament based on tournament winnings, and there is nothing about conceding early, then I dont see anything wrong with this.
What is everyone whining about, why does conceding a match when you know you can't win bad for snooker at all?
I seems amusing so many people are getting apparently upset over this... all he did was concede, what is the big deal????
the big deal was that there were at least 5 frames left, the match was entirely winnable for him and he showed an astounding lack of class. Snooker is generally regarded as the showcase of class in the cuesport world and there shouldn't be room for poor sportsmanship.
O'Sullivan has won a good number of extremely well paying tournaments, he owes the sport and the fans more class than what he showed.