It's time to give some recognition to the top US players.
I am fully willing to acknowledge that the European players are deeper with top talent than the US. I agree there is simply no way that the US players are going to compete at the world stage playing one international event a year and spending the rest of the time sitting out or playing bar table events. Not when the European players are playing their own tour and hitting all of the majors. Unfortunately our lack of an organized domestic pool tour and the resulting small prize money keeps players like Justin home and I don't see this changing any time soon.
I also understand that the criticism for the US players is somewhat constructive in the sense that we all yearn to see some of our top guns follow this path and represent us at the highest levels. So I get that while much of it is presented abrasively, it comes from a place of wanting more for them, not less.
Yet I feel it is important to recognize just how strong our players do play.
First let's talk Mosconi Cup. Here's the thing. Everyone looks bad when they're playing bad, and everyone struggles to deliver their best game when they're in a losing match up. I acknowledge that team Europe is better than team US. US has almost no shot to win. So yes, there is a skill difference. But the skill difference isn't as big as the score indicates. When you know you can't win it makes an impact and so it's not a surprise that our players perform towards the bottom of their range. This in turn results in a lopsided loss, which just makes it harder for next years team. Now, if our players all played their best it would still be hard for them to win. My point is only that judging someone from how they perform when they are in a spot where they have no chance is pretty harsh.
I am out here at the US Open Bar Table Championships live and had the pleasure of watching the hotseat match between Sky and SVB in the 10 ball. The level of play was absolutely stellar. I play pretty sporty and sometimes I wonder where the difference is between myself and the top tier. Watching this match it was obvious. There were many, many shots they executed that simply wouldn't have been in my arsenal. Jump shots. Finesse two rail kicks to lay up on a ball and not leave an easy return. Two rail kick cuts thinning a ball along the end rail into the corner. Beautiful safeties that got frozen to the backs of two balls preventing any reasonable return. They had some moving battles that would've been the end of me on each turn, and they kept coming with shots inning after inning. Then they got the break working and starting trading run outs with superb shot making and intricate position play in tight quarters. Sure it was on 7 foot tables, but striking the exact part of a ball when jumping and kicking isn't much easier just because the end rail is a foot less wide, and in short sets with any error being almost a guaranteed sell out the pressure is ever present.
Look. I want the US to do well. I'd love to see our players compete internationally and strive to represent us on a global scale.
But I can't fault them for not spending tens of thousands of dollars they don't have to pursue something they might not achieve that wouldn't recoup their investment even if they were able to get there. I'm in Vegas as I said and pool reminds me of the slots. You put a lot of money in and hope that maybe you get most of it back, all with the dream that something amazing might happen if you're truly blessed. There are a couple of individuals including SVB that were able to make it happen, but for many, many others they went broke and spent much of their life chasing a dream that was out of reach.
None of us on the forums are doing it. But then we play our local handicapped tournaments or our leagues and type on a keyboard. We say 'well, we don't pretend to be professional pool players, if we were we'd do it different'. Suppose Oscar and Justin and Sky and Billy weren't interested and able to become internationally dominant due to the challenge and the lack of payoff. This doesn't make them terrible people or terrible players. Why can't they be allowed to simply say 'it's too tough and not enough reward' and allow them to enjoy doing their best with the substantial skill sets they have where it is economically feasible? It's funny, when you are a moderate player like me people see you win a set off a pro and give you a compliment, because they compare you to other weekend warriors and you look favorable. But when you win a few tournaments people start comparing you to the top 10 in the world and berating you over the fact that you're not the best.
Sorry I couldn't find a way to express my thoughts more clearly. I guess what I'm saying is that while I hope that pool changes and look forward to our next international star, I respect the heck out of our top players and think they play an amazing game of pool.
I am fully willing to acknowledge that the European players are deeper with top talent than the US. I agree there is simply no way that the US players are going to compete at the world stage playing one international event a year and spending the rest of the time sitting out or playing bar table events. Not when the European players are playing their own tour and hitting all of the majors. Unfortunately our lack of an organized domestic pool tour and the resulting small prize money keeps players like Justin home and I don't see this changing any time soon.
I also understand that the criticism for the US players is somewhat constructive in the sense that we all yearn to see some of our top guns follow this path and represent us at the highest levels. So I get that while much of it is presented abrasively, it comes from a place of wanting more for them, not less.
Yet I feel it is important to recognize just how strong our players do play.
First let's talk Mosconi Cup. Here's the thing. Everyone looks bad when they're playing bad, and everyone struggles to deliver their best game when they're in a losing match up. I acknowledge that team Europe is better than team US. US has almost no shot to win. So yes, there is a skill difference. But the skill difference isn't as big as the score indicates. When you know you can't win it makes an impact and so it's not a surprise that our players perform towards the bottom of their range. This in turn results in a lopsided loss, which just makes it harder for next years team. Now, if our players all played their best it would still be hard for them to win. My point is only that judging someone from how they perform when they are in a spot where they have no chance is pretty harsh.
I am out here at the US Open Bar Table Championships live and had the pleasure of watching the hotseat match between Sky and SVB in the 10 ball. The level of play was absolutely stellar. I play pretty sporty and sometimes I wonder where the difference is between myself and the top tier. Watching this match it was obvious. There were many, many shots they executed that simply wouldn't have been in my arsenal. Jump shots. Finesse two rail kicks to lay up on a ball and not leave an easy return. Two rail kick cuts thinning a ball along the end rail into the corner. Beautiful safeties that got frozen to the backs of two balls preventing any reasonable return. They had some moving battles that would've been the end of me on each turn, and they kept coming with shots inning after inning. Then they got the break working and starting trading run outs with superb shot making and intricate position play in tight quarters. Sure it was on 7 foot tables, but striking the exact part of a ball when jumping and kicking isn't much easier just because the end rail is a foot less wide, and in short sets with any error being almost a guaranteed sell out the pressure is ever present.
Look. I want the US to do well. I'd love to see our players compete internationally and strive to represent us on a global scale.
But I can't fault them for not spending tens of thousands of dollars they don't have to pursue something they might not achieve that wouldn't recoup their investment even if they were able to get there. I'm in Vegas as I said and pool reminds me of the slots. You put a lot of money in and hope that maybe you get most of it back, all with the dream that something amazing might happen if you're truly blessed. There are a couple of individuals including SVB that were able to make it happen, but for many, many others they went broke and spent much of their life chasing a dream that was out of reach.
None of us on the forums are doing it. But then we play our local handicapped tournaments or our leagues and type on a keyboard. We say 'well, we don't pretend to be professional pool players, if we were we'd do it different'. Suppose Oscar and Justin and Sky and Billy weren't interested and able to become internationally dominant due to the challenge and the lack of payoff. This doesn't make them terrible people or terrible players. Why can't they be allowed to simply say 'it's too tough and not enough reward' and allow them to enjoy doing their best with the substantial skill sets they have where it is economically feasible? It's funny, when you are a moderate player like me people see you win a set off a pro and give you a compliment, because they compare you to other weekend warriors and you look favorable. But when you win a few tournaments people start comparing you to the top 10 in the world and berating you over the fact that you're not the best.
Sorry I couldn't find a way to express my thoughts more clearly. I guess what I'm saying is that while I hope that pool changes and look forward to our next international star, I respect the heck out of our top players and think they play an amazing game of pool.