Perfect pool tournament story

[genomachino]

The answer is a flat NO !

Thanks for your reply, Geno, and your acknowledgement that I might be sincere - because I am. Unfortunately and, as I expected, you again did not answer the question. To me, and probably most others, your reply seems carefully crafted only to evade the question and spam the thread. I didn't ask about, nor do I care about, eye dominance.

The question posed at least ten times over the past year is: If I center the cue beneath my eyes are my eyes then within 1/8 inch of that "perfect" place you refer to? Please, no more spam - a direct answer would be greatly appreciated. This is a meat and potatos question.

Hi there again,

Depending on your strength of eye dominance it could be directly under your right eye or left eye or anywhere inbetween the 2 eyes.

With Perfect Aim I help players find this perfect spot. if you will call me I will help you.

This is about as clear as I can explain it. That's it.

715-563-8712

This has helped thousands of players now. If you understand it and can apply it your aiming ability will increase alot very quickly.

I want to help you and I'm not trying to avoid telling you anything.

Give me a call. Geno.........

 

[JoeyA]

Hi there again,

Depending on your strength of eye dominance it could be directly under your right eye or left eye or anywhere inbetween the 2 eyes.

With Perfect Aim I help players find this perfect spot. if you will call me I will help you.

This is about as clear as I can explain it. That's it.

715-563-8712

This has helped thousands of players now. If you understand it and can apply it your aiming ability will increase alot very quickly.

I want to help you and I'm not trying to avoid telling you anything.

Give me a call. Geno.........

Now that you have told Shankster his answer (which is NOT what he expected), let's see if he pays you for the DVD.

 

[shankster8]

Now that you have told Shankster his answer (which is NOT what he expected), let's see if he pays you for the DVD.

JoeyA, I was one of the first to pay for the DVD. Where in the world do you come up that comment.

You are right, Joey that I did not expect that answer from Geno, because it directly contradicts the contents of his DVD. It has taken a year for him to finally feel enough pressure to take a stance, and I am happy he has. It's been long enough that he's remained silent and allowed worshipers like you to answer for him and to bury my question with innacurate and irrelevant replies. I've been trying all along to get good information out to this forum; it seems to me that you and a few others have been primarily concerned with hugging Geno. But, the truth is the truth, and it can now unfold.

Earlier this afternoon I wrote a reply to Stukart, but the AZB site was misbehaving and I couldn't post it. I am so happy about that now because it probably would have pre-empted Geno's reply. I will post that reply now, and our group can begin analyzing what is "Perfect Aim", and the group can also begin alanyzing the genuineness of Geno's answer.

In five hours I go to surgery, so I'm not going to say much more tonite (no big thing, it's only a hernia repair), but I look forward to finally resolving these issues. We'll talk again soon.

 

[shankster8]

Wow!

I'll tell you exactly why the answer is No.

Your Question: If I center the cue beneath my eyes are my eyes then within 1/8 inch of that "perfect" place you refer to?

The real answer is that without someone standing right over you while you are down on your cue the chances that you are exactly 1/8" off of that perfect place is very very doubtful.

I've helped many friends find that "perfect" spot and most had to be adjusted more than 3/4" - 1" or more. (In either direction, based on dominate eye of each player)

It's not the easiest to tell someone exactly over a chat forum, because everyone is different.

I did send Gene a message that I'm in AZ and could meet up with you to help you, but after all your nice kind words I think I'm gonna pass. Sorry Gene!

Stuckart, thanks for having considered helping me, but if you don't know that the answer to my question is "yes", then you could not have helped anyway. You say you've helped many friends find that "perfect" spot and most had to be adjusted 3/4" - 1" or more. For your information, the reason they had to move that far is because they didn't have a clue where their eyes were supposed to be, according to Geno. If they started from a cue-centered position, they would have had to move no more than 1/8 inch.

I'm sorry to say this but I really don't think you and most other diciples of Geno even understand what he is teaching, otherwise you'd understand the significance of my question.

And why do you think Geno continues to avoid answering my question.
I'm certain he knows the answer is "yes", but doesn't want his diciples to discover that all he's teaching is to center the cue beneath your eyes. He's presented that lesson in such a convoluted package that you're all baffled by BS.

Whether you wish to believe it or not, I'm trying to contribute good information to this forum. It is Geno that is disguising the information I'm trying to spread. It is not my information, nor is it
Geno's. Richard Kranicki expounded on proper eye position in his book "An Answer to a Pool Player's Prayers" long ago. Roger Long called this forum's attention to that book a year or so ago, and cautioned that Geno was precariously close to infringing on Kranicki's material.

I was one of the original group that bought Geno's DVD (and his second one). There was mass confusion after his DVD was released, despitethe fact it was the most expensive pool-instructional DVD ever sold, by far. Consequently, he promised us all he'd answer all questions from his customers.

I was one of the many that was baffled by Geno's DVD. All I could come up with was that Perfect Aim was nothing but a requirement to center the cue beneath your eyes. I deduced that on the basis that our eyespan is nearly equal to the cueball diameter. Stukart, go look into a mirror and measure the distance between your pupils (I call that "eyespan"). I just did, and my eyespan is 2 3/8 inches. Also realize that the cueball diameter is 2 1/4 inches.

Remember how Geno told you to aim? When you cut left, you sight along the left side of the cueball with the left eye and see it overlap the object ball the proper fractional amount. On right cuts, you sight along the right side of the cue ball with the right eye and see it overlap the object ball the proper fractional amount.

Now, if you put your cue to the center vertical axis of the cueball and center your eyes above it, your left eye is aligned with the left edge of the cueball and your right eye is aligned with the right side of the cueball (within 1/8 inch, probably within 1/16 inch). That is why the answer to my question is "yes" - if you simply center the cue between your eyes, your eyes are naturally aligned with the cueball edges. It is not rocket-science, is it? In fact, it is very simple.

Geno could easily acknowledge this, I've posted this numerous times - but he avoids my question over and over. I can only surmise he wants you and the rest of his diciples to remain confused. Rather than tell you to center the cue beneath your eyes, he says to move your eys till you "lose the shot" , then come back till the shot looks right. That is a subjective and experience-based maneuver inappropriate for novices, and apparently even for more advanced players based on numerous replies elicited by my question to Geno.

At this point, clearing this matter up is also a matter of principal to me. I feel like a sucker, and every time he avoids my question, it's like a slap in the face - and each time he loses more respect in my eyes. I am continually surprised to see so many hugging Geno, despite their awareness that he continues to dodge a legitimate question from one of his original customers, and despite the fact he committed on this forum to answer such questions.

Geno could very simply answer the question, We all know he will write pages in reply to trivia and in exchange of niceties. Again, this is a meat and potatos question and deserves an answer. So please, huggers, let Geno answer the question.

 

[genomachino]

Good luck with your surgery........

Stuckart, thanks for having considered helping me, but if you don't know that the answer to my question is "yes", then you could not have helped anyway. You say you've helped many friends find that "perfect" spot and most had to be adjusted 3/4" - 1" or more. For your information, the reason they had to move that far is because they didn't have a clue where their eyes were supposed to be, according to Geno. If they started from a cue-centered position, they would have had to move no more than 1/8 inch.

I'm sorry to say this but I really don't think you and most other diciples of Geno even understand what he is teaching, otherwise you'd understand the significance of my question.

And why do you think Geno continues to avoid answering my question.
I'm certain he knows the answer is "yes", but doesn't want his diciples to discover that all he's teaching is to center the cue beneath your eyes. He's presented that lesson in such a convoluted package that you're all baffled by BS.

Whether you wish to believe it or not, I'm trying to contribute good information to this forum. It is Geno that is disguising the information I'm trying to spread. It is not my information, nor is it
Geno's. Richard Kranicki expounded on proper eye position in his book "An Answer to a Pool Player's Prayers" long ago. Roger Long called this forum's attention to that book a year or so ago, and cautioned that Geno was precariously close to infringing on Kranicki's material.

I was one of the original group that bought Geno's DVD (and his second one). There was mass confusion after his DVD was released, despitethe fact it was the most expensive pool-instructional DVD ever sold, by far. Consequently, he promised us all he'd answer all questions from his customers.

I was one of the many that was baffled by Geno's DVD. All I could come up with was that Perfect Aim was nothing but a requirement to center the cue beneath your eyes. I deduced that on the basis that our eyespan is nearly equal to the cueball diameter. Stukart, go look into a mirror and measure the distance between your pupils (I call that "eyespan"). I just did, and my eyespan is 2 3/8 inches. Also realize that the cueball diameter is 2 1/4 inches.

Remember how Geno told you to aim? When you cut left, you sight along the left side of the cueball and see it overlap the object ball the proper fractional amount. On right cuts, you sight along the right side of the cue ball and see it overlap the object ball the proper fractional amount.

Now, if you put your cue to the center vertical axis of the cueball and center your eyes above it, your left eye is aligned with the left edge of the cueball and your right eye is aligned with the right side of the cueball (within 1/8 inch, probably within 1/16 inch). That is why the answer to my question is "yes" - if you simply center the cue between your eyes, your eyes are naturally aligned with the cueball edges. It is not rocket-science, is it? In fact, it is very simple.

Geno could easily acknowledge this, I've posted this numerous times - but he avoids my question over and over. I can only surmise he wants you and the rest of his diciples to remain confused. Rather than tell you to center the cue beneath your eyes, he says to move your eys till you "lose the shot" , then come back till the shot looks right. That is a subjective and experience-based maneuver inappropriate for novices, and apparently even for more advanced players based on numerous replies elicited by my question to Geno.

At this point, clearing this matter up is also a matter of principal to me. I feel like a sucker, and every time he avoids my question, it's like a slap in the face - and each time he loses more respect in my eyes. I am continually surprised to see so many hugging Geno, despite their awareness that he continues to dodge a legitimate question from one of his original customers, and despite the fact he committed on this forum to answer such questions.

Geno could very simply answer the question, We all know he will write pages in reply to trivia and in exchange of niceties. Again, this is a meat and potatos question and deserves an answer. So please, huggers, let Geno answer the question.

Your neccesity to be right is getting in the way of your ability to understand how this works.

You seemed to think Perfect Aim was a scam because you didn't understand it and tried to expose something.

These players that are defending Perfect Aim have improved their games more in a few weeks after learning this than ever before. They are really trying to help you especially Jerry Stuckert. He's been teaching this to players and watching their games improve in leaps and bounds. He understands exactly how this work and how much it can help any player no matter what level of play they are at. He's one nice guy but it looks like he doesn't even want to help you anymore.

I'm going to try this one more time and one more time only.

If you will call me I will try to help you understand how this works so you can zero in on your aim. This works and it works well but you need to know which eye is your pool shooting dominant eye.

Call me and I will work with you and help you improve your game.

I'm almost tempted to fly to Phoenix but I have to many commitment here in Minneapolis and wisconsin right now. I really wish I could.

I feel kind of bad for you.

Good luck with your surgery.

Tip of the day. Listen to what the doc says and don't overdo it.

 

[PocketPoint]

If I practice a shot 10,000 times in a year, and can now make it 99 out of 100, does it matter where my eyes are on that shot?

Just saying....

 

[genomachino]

Yes it does........

If I practice a shot 10,000 times in a year, and can now make it 99 out of 100, does it matter where my eyes are on that shot?

Just saying....

There are many optical illusions when we aim. The biggest is accidently making the non dominant eye work as the dominant eye a little. When this happens is when the shot still looks good kind of and we miss it by a mile.

Especially in a pressure situation. It's real easy to dog the eyes. It's so sweet to get down on the shot and see it clear as a bell and know you have it aimed right correctly.

Sure you can still make the shot without this knowledge but why wouldn't you want to have the nutz. Perfect Aim is the NUTZ.

If you were shooting a gun down by your hip you could get pretty good at that also. You would be just naturally getting the gun lined up with your eyes to hit the target from up above. .

If somebody showed you how to put the sight in the little grove you might shoot a little better.

But now if you taught all the people shooting the gun to put the sight in the little grove they could shoot as good as you.

If you kept shooting from the hip in a competition you would probably get beat by the people that used the sights. Pretty soon you would have to use the sights or you would never win.

Or you could just try to tell everyone to go back to the hip.

Try telling players that understand and know Perfect Aim that they didn't need to know this.

Some would try to convince you but most players just want to keep it quiet because you are the competition. They really don't want to tell you.



This is why some players miss alot and some don't. Some are just better at naturally getting the eyes in the more correct position to see the shot better.

Repetition will get you there also but only to a certain level. Just like doing anything alot.

There is no reason on the face of the earth that everyone should be able to aim as good as any world champion. Once you can aim perfect you can now practice shooting and coordinating what the eyes are seeing correctly with the brain and body.

Once you learn Perfect Aim you would understand this. If you get down then and the shot doesn't look right you will know how to correct your aim.

Then it will look better and the brain is getting the right info so your body can complete the task.

With the eyes in the correct position the easy shots become simple, the tougher shots look easier and the difficult shots become makeable.

Plus it's just really fun to see the shot right and know you are seeing it right................

When I walk into a pool room I just look around and think to myself.

If they only Knew.....What a shame they don't..........

 

[MOJOE]

Quick question Geno, and as you know I have purchased both of your DVD's so not looking for any free info here..

I did the softball thing that you suggested and found that the balls line up perfectly for me when lined up directly with the center of my nose, chin etc..

Does this make sense? I initially thought I might be left eye dominant but when doing the big ball test, it has proven otherwise..

JoeyK

 

[genomachino]

Give me a call joey. I'll clear it up for you.

Quick question Geno, and as you know I have purchased both of your DVD's so not looking for any free info here..

I did the softball thing that you suggested and found that the balls line up perfectly for me when lined up directly with the center of my nose, chin etc..

Does this make sense? I initially thought I might be left eye dominant but when doing the big ball test, it has proven otherwise..

JoeyK

This might sound funny but you need to know what you are looking for. You can move your head to the right on the straight in shot and you will lose the shot right away. That is because your head is as far to the right as it can be on the straight in shot. Your dominant eye is in the dominant position.

You can move your head about an inch to the left and make your right eye work as the dominant eye. You don't want to shoot like this because it looks kind of cockeyed but now you can make a choice. Right eye or left eye.

If I remember correctly you were seeing the shots best when you were as far to the right as you could go. This is alway keeping your left eye in the dominant position.

But you never know. Give me a call and I will talk you through it. It's good to know how to work it with these big balls because you could help other players find their true dominant eye for shooting pool.

I have found that without this test it is sometimes hard to figure out the true pool shooting dominant eye.

Give me a call and we'll get this 100% correct for sure so you can see it.

Have a great day geno..... 715-563-8712

 

[genomachino]

Give me a call. I'll clear it up for you......

Quick question Geno, and as you know I have purchased both of your DVD's so not looking for any free info here..

I did the softball thing that you suggested and found that the balls line up perfectly for me when lined up directly with the center of my nose, chin etc..

Does this make sense? I initially thought I might be left eye dominant but when doing the big ball test, it has proven otherwise..

JoeyK

Hi there Joey,

Give me a call. It would be fun to work with you on this. I know you'll use the info to help many other players. That's great.

Feel free to call me anytime. 715-563-8712.

 

[MOJOE]

Geno,

I'll try to give you a call this evening when I'm at the table.. At work now, but should be able to call you later.. What's the best time, I'm EST..

 

[genomachino]

Anytime my friend........

Geno,

I'll try to give you a call this evening when I'm at the table.. At work now, but should be able to call you later.. What's the best time, I'm EST..

After 7:00 cell phone minutes are free with Verizon. If you have Verizon their free for everyone.

Anytime will be fine..............

 

[MOJOE]

Thank you Geno...!!!!

Gene,

Thanks so much for taking the time to talk with me on the phone today.. We worked it out that I am definitely Left Eye dominant and you have helped me immensely.

The other tip that you gave me about aiming is SOOOO valuable as well. I appreciate the time that you have given me as well as your help with my game.

I look forward to the day where we can meet and I can buy you dinner. Hope you have a fantastic weekend my friend.

Best regards,

JoeyK

After 7:00 cell phone minutes are free with Verizon. If you have Verizon their free for everyone.

Anytime will be fine..............

 

[MOJOE]

Shankster,

I understand that you think the answer is "yes" to your question but actually it is not.. We have many different pupillary distances so there is no cookie cutter answer.

Gene has helped me a ton. Initially, I thought as you did and had confusion going back to what I always did before. Consequently, I went back to seeing the balls incorrectly, way too often. After discussing my perceptions on the phone with Gene, he was able to get me to where I needed to be.

Give him a call, he is more than willing to help you out and happy to do so. This has helped me out and I hope you can find the help that you are seeking as well. Gene is a great player with a ton of knowledge that he's willing to share.

Best of luck to you on your pool journey! Gene helped speed my journey up considerably, I hope you have the same fortune I did.

Peace, JoeyK

 

[shankster8]

Shankster,

I understand that you think the answer is "yes" to your question but actually it is not.. We have many different pupillary distances so there is no cookie cutter answer.

Gene has helped me a ton. Initially, I thought as you did and had confusion going back to what I always did before. Consequently, I went back to seeing the balls incorrectly, way too often. After discussing my perceptions on the phone with Gene, he was able to get me to where I needed to be.

Give him a call, he is more than willing to help you out and happy to do so. This has helped me out and I hope you can find the help that you are seeking as well. Gene is a great player with a ton of knowledge that he's willing to share.



Best of luck to you on your pool journey! Gene helped speed my journey up considerably, I hope you have the same fortune I did.

Peace, JoeyK

Mojoe, thanks for your input; I can tell that you mean well. You are wrong about the answer being "No", however. And for your information, Geno knows the answer is "Yes", but is purposely misleading you and others by answering "No".

I don't question that he has helped you and others, but that does not change the fact he is teaching nothing more than fractional ball aiming with the cue centered beneath the eyes. That is nothing new. He just presents that old information in such a convoluted manner that most people remain confused by what he is saying. As a result, he can continue giving lessons - and I guess he plans to put out another DVD (hillarious IMO).

Mojoe, how do you think I know that Geno is lying when he answers the question "No"? The reason is that I did call him about a year ago. He initially probed me about my level of play. Once he ascertained that I was a "fair" shooter, and that I centered the cue between my eyes, he stated that I shouldn't have to move move my eyes more than 1/8 inch from the center position. I promptly told him that that was exactly what I had repeatedly been saying on AZB. He fell silent, and did not respond to that. Our conversation was generally uninformative. He did say apologetically at one point that "Perfect Aim" was meant for lower level players than me - players who didn't know one end of the cue from the other - or words very similar to that - like players who hardly knew which end of the stick to use (I do not remember his exact words, but they were very similar to what I've said.).

I respected that candor, mentally wrote off the money I spent on his DVD as a bad investmen, and decided to let the matter lie.

Subsequently, however, he posted how glad he was to have been able to help me, and other such hogwash. That he coopted my name as a reference rekindled my angst. I was tired of his spam, frustrated by his avoidance of answering my question, and unhappy about his misleading of others.

I posted the above information long ago, but Geno simply denied it. That frustrated me, but I really didn't know how to compete with outright lying -especially since Geno's huggers repeatedly jumped in and together with Geno, Geno), burried my posts. I'm sure there are many AZBr's who remember that era.

Mojoe, please understand that I am trying to share good information here, and am not attacking you. I feel that you are sincere about improving your game - the same as most of us, but I need to point out how shallow and distracting our words can be sometime, despite the fact we mean well. You said "I understand that you think the answer is "yes" to your question but actually it is not.. We have many different pupillary distances so there is no cookie cutter answer."

Honestly, I don't have a clue what you're saying here (and I suggest you don't try to explain it), but it distracts people from the points I'm trying to make. Please read the information I presented above, again, and also read my reply to Stuckart in post 24 (which unequivocably proves that the answer is "yes"). I believe you will then better understand your mentor, Geno.

That Geno is now brazen enough to openly lie in answer to my question tells me he must be confident he and his huggers can again bury my posts. IMO, he's overconfident this time, though, but I can see his work - he's got hugger JoeyA implying I didn't pay for the DVD - an obvious effort to derail the focus on himself and "Perfect Aim". I guess I'll ask hugger JoeyA to produce his evidence, and move that issue toward resolution.

 

[genomachino]

Please be sure before you say something......

Mojoe, thanks for your input; I can tell that you mean well. You are wrong about the answer being "No", however. And for your information, Geno knows the answer is "Yes", but is purposely misleading you and others by answering "No".

I don't question that he has helped you and others, but that does not change the fact he is teaching nothing more than fractional ball aiming with the cue centered beneath the eyes. That is nothing new. He just presents that old information in such a convoluted manner that most people remain confused by what he is saying. As a result, he can continue giving lessons - and I guess he plans to put out another DVD (hillarious IMO).

Mojoe, how do you think I know that Geno is lying when he answers the question "No"? The reason is that I did call him about a year ago. He initially probed me about my level of play. Once he ascertained that I was a "fair" shooter, and that I centered the cue between my eyes, he stated that I shouldn't have to move move my eyes more than 1/8 inch from the center position. I promptly told him that that was exactly what I had repeatedly been saying on AZB. He fell silent, and did not respond to that. Our conversation was generally uninformative. He did say apologetically at one point that "Perfect Aim" was meant for lower level players than me - players who didn't know one end of the cue from the other - or words very similar to that - like players who hardly knew which end of the stick to use (I do not remember his exact words, but they were very similar to what I've said.).

I respected that candor, mentally wrote off the money I spent on his DVD as a bad investmen, and decided to let the matter lie.

Subsequently, however, he posted how glad he was to have been able to help me, and other such hogwash. That he coopted my name as a reference rekindled my angst. I was tired of his spam, frustrated by his avoidance of answering my question, and unhappy about his misleading of others.

I posted the above information long ago, but Geno simply denied it. That frustrated me, but I really didn't know how to compete with outright lying -especially since Geno's huggers repeatedly jumped in and together with Geno, Geno), burried my posts. I'm sure there are many AZBr's who remember that era.

Mojoe, please understand that I am trying to share good information here, and am not attacking you. I feel that you are sincere about improving your game - the same as most of us, but I need to point out how shallow and distracting our words can be sometime, despite the fact we mean well. You said "I understand that you think the answer is "yes" to your question but actually it is not.. We have many different pupillary distances so there is no cookie cutter answer."

Honestly, I don't have a clue what you're saying here (and I suggest you don't try to explain it), but it distracts people from the points I'm trying to make. Please read the information I presented above, again, and also read my reply to Stuckart in post 24 (which unequivocably proves that the answer is "yes"). I believe you will then better understand your mentor, Geno.

That Geno is now brazen enough to openly lie in answer to my question tells me he must be confident he and his huggers can again bury my posts. IMO, he's overconfident this time, though, but I can see his work - he's got hugger JoeyA implying I didn't pay for the DVD - an obvious effort to derail the focus on himself and "Perfect Aim". I guess I'll ask hugger JoeyA to produce his evidence, and move that issue toward resolution.

Hi there Shank,

Please be sure before you say something that you remember what you heard right. This statement is so rediculous I almost can't believe that you believe it or that I actually said something that would lead you to believe that this is what I said.

He did say apologetically at one point that "Perfect Aim" was meant for lower level players than me - players who didn't know one end of the cue from the other - or words very similar to that - like players who hardly knew which end of the stick to use (I do not remember his exact words, but they were very similar to what I've said.).

Perfect Aim has helped everyone that has grasped the knowledge and understands it at every level. I understand it does and so do all the other huggers, as you stated, that have learned this.

For crying out loud, open your eyes and read and see all the players that this has helped and are shooting better than ever.

Do you think these players are just all stupid.

Please don't say I said things I didn't. I can assure you that that statement could not be further from the truth.

Have a great day geno.............

PS Joey had no idea that you bought the DVD. You see it kind of hurts when people accuse you or make false claims that you know are not true.

 

[peteypooldude]

For the record. Geno has helped many players with no cost at all.
He done a review just everybody else. His information is absolutely
valuable . Never heard anyone speak of it except Gene.
Stop trying to bash a man who dedicates himself to helping others.,
If it did not help you then so be it. That does not give you right to down play and harass the man. Would a refund make you happy? Because I will
donate if that's what your after

 

[shankster8]

Now that you have told Shankster his answer (which is NOT what he expected), let's see if he pays you for the DVD.

JoeyA**hugger, you have implied that I did not pay for Geno's DVD. I can tell you it confuses many of us as to how you can make such a statement. Obviously only Geno or his accountant would know such a thing.

I have stated above that I did pay for Geno's DVD. So, why don't you share some evidence with us. Or should I say, hug Geno and ask him to give you some evidence to share with us. Many are in suspense, so please don't keep us waiting.

 

[peteypooldude]

JoeyA**hugger, you have implied that I did not pay for Geno's DVD. I can tell you it confuses many of us as to how you can make such a statement. Obviously only Geno or his accountant would know such a thing.

I have stated above that I did pay for Geno's DVD. So, why don't you share some evidence with us. Or should I say, hug Geno and ask him to give you some evidence to share with us. Many are in suspense, so please don't keep us waiting.

No one really cares Who is the MANY you refer to. I just see you

 

[Scott Lee]

stuckart...Just curious, but what if the shooter has no dominant eye? Geno will state that that's impossible, but science backs up the fact that up to 20% of the population has no dominant eye.

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com

Wow!

I'll tell you exactly why the answer is No.

Your Question: If I center the cue beneath my eyes are my eyes then within 1/8 inch of that "perfect" place you refer to?

The real answer is that without someone standing right over you while you are down on your cue the chances that you are exactly 1/8" off of that perfect place is very very doubtful.

I've helped many friends find that "perfect" spot and most had to be adjusted more than 3/4" - 1" or more. (In either direction, based on dominate eye of each player)

It's not the easiest to tell someone exactly over a chat forum, because everyone is different.

I did send Gene a message that I'm in AZ and could meet up with you to help you, but after all your nice kind words I think I'm gonna pass. Sorry Gene!