Pics of fancy sneakys?
- Thread starter Monstermash
- Start date
Thanks guys! Keep 'em coming! :thumbup:
Those are some pretty cues. Whats up with the ones with wraps though? Are we considering those Sneaky's? I thought a sneaky would be classified as something that was wrapless, although I could be wrong.
I'm not sure what Craig is thinking
but I would call his cue a conversion. I certainly wouldn't call it a Sneaky Pete in any form.In fact, to me, a sneaky pete looks like a house cue. If it has rings, inlays, spear points, I might call it something like a Fancy Sneaky Pete (like you've called it), but rings, joints, etc., and they start to fall away from the Sneaky Pete definition, IMO. They might be conversions, wrapless full-spliced cues, etc. But, traditional sneaky pete in my mind is pretty specific. No joint work. No ring work. No inlays. Certainly no wraps.
Fred
Last edited:
Eric Wynne
Banned
Very nice lumber everyone ...
I'm not sure what Craig is thinking
In fact, to me, a sneaky pete looks like a house cue. If it has rings, inlays, spear points, I might call it something like a Fancy Sneaky Pete (like you've called it), but rings, joints, etc., and they start to fall away from the Sneaky Pete definition, IMO. They might be conversions, wrapless full-spliced cues, etc. But, traditional sneaky pete in my mind is pretty specific. No joint work. No ring work. No inlays. Certainly no wraps.
Fred
Fred, I have to agree, there a many gorgeous cues in this thread but most can't be considered sneaky petes.
This one has a joint collar but is still pretty sneaky for a Balabushka.
