Players of the past vs. those of today – We need a time machine!

BillPorter

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Suppose there were a time machine that was available to pool players and had been around for 35 years. Buddy Hall, back in 1975 might have been the best 9-ball player on the planet, but he wasn’t getting rich because he had to give up weight every time he played. So he popped into the time machine and set it for 2010 to see if he could scare up some action. I’m sure he would have stayed under the radar for a few months so that he could adapt to the equipment of today with fast cloth, etc. But suppose he practiced hours a day and after 3 months decided that he was in dead punch and ready for a match. Would those of you who think today’s players are better than those of yesteryear be ready to bet your case $10,000 against him? I’m thinking that if you really studied your pool history and knew how good Buddy played when in his highest gear, you’d be hesitant to stake one of today’s players against him. There were stretches in the 1970s that Buddy came so close to perfect pool that he was literally boring to watch, running out precise patterns and grinding down the toughest opponents.

But on the other hand, if we send SVB back to 1975 and give him 3 months to get used to the equipment of that period, who in that era would you bet your case $10,000 on? I’m thinking that he would have been a match, or more than a match, for any of the top players of that era.

Let’s face it, human beings haven’t evolved over the past 35 years. We have the same brains, muscles, and nerve cells we had then. The best of us have the same capacity for heart and courage, the same potential for a killer instinct, the same drive to win. If we could magically transport players forward or backward in time, and give them ample opportunity to adjust to the equipment of the era, the best of yesteryear and the best of today are probably going to be a dead heat. None of today’s players would be a favorite, in my opinion, over a 45 year-old Willie Mosconi who had spent a few months acclimating to today’s equipment. And none of the old timers would be likely to enjoy a long match with Dennis Ochollo or SVB if they had gotten in dead stroke on the old equipment.

I do think a good case could be made that there are MORE great players around the globe today than in 1975. Maybe not as charismatic, but more numerous.
 
So Earl's record will probably never be broken.......

In support of your argument, that is probably why no one will beat Earl Strickland's US Open 9-Ball record. There are just too many great players which drastically reduces the chances for any player winning the tournament 6 times. It is much like Nolan Ryan's 7 no-hitters. I dont think any pitcher today even has 2 no-hitters but there are better pitchers out there than Nolan was.
 
The players of yesteryear would stomp on the current group. Mosconi...Lassiter....gimme a break.

Nolan Ryan threw 7 no hitter because there were no such things as middle relivers back then. Starters sucked it up and went 7-8 inning every 5th day. Nowdays they are groomed to get the the 5th on a pitch count and never expected to get a complete game.

rack me im out!
 
I would like to see Eddie Taylor come back and play Bartram some.

I think Eddie Taylor may be the exception to the idea that past and present top players would play at about the same level given time to acclimate to the equipment. In my opinion, Eddie, in his prime and brought to 2010 with our time machine, would be the top bank pool player on the planet.
 
I think Eddie Taylor may be the exception to the idea that past and present top players would play at about the same level given time to acclimate to the equipment. In my opinion, Eddie, in his prime and brought to 2010 with our time machine, would be the top bank pool player on the planet.

Taylor was a freak, but so was Sandy Koufax and Bob Gibson many years ago. Hitters today would have the same problems that hitters of yesterday had with these two guys. And Hank Aaron, Frank Robinson, Rod Carew and George Brett would hit anyone pitching today.

Magic Johnson remains the best basketball player I ever saw and Bill Bradley could run (point guard) any team effectively today as well. Johnny Unitas and Sonny Jurgenson had just as strong arms and delivery as any modern day quarterback. And Roger Staubach, Joe Namath and Bart Starr knew how to win games, and could still do it in today's environment!

Yes, the best players of yesterday were just as good as the best players of today in many sports.
 
Last edited:
In support of your argument, that is probably why no one will beat Earl Strickland's US Open 9-Ball record. There are just too many great players which drastically reduces the chances for any player winning the tournament 6 times. It is much like Nolan Ryan's 7 no-hitters. I dont think any pitcher today even has 2 no-hitters but there are better pitchers out there than Nolan was.


Well, yes there may be some better pitchers today than Nolan Ryan but to be fair there were some better pitchers than Nolan Ryan when he was pitching too. He threw 7 no-hitters because he was that type of pitcher that when he was in "dead stroke" so to speak he was virtually unhittable, but there were other pitchers at the time, Palmer, Carlton, Seaver etc that were certainly more consistent and their records show it. Ryan's top gear was higher but their everyday game was better.
 
Back
Top