I'm old school and rarely play a safe. I go for almost everything and make incredible shots...sometimes.
I like playing a friendly game where everyone gets a shot, but I usually win.:smile:
This way...no one gets mad.:thumbup:
Running a table all the time and not giving anyone a shot can be lonely.
You are actually playing with yourself and being selfish.
People will not want to rack for you if you don't give them a shot.:smile:
And I always say...for real...you can't play a great player safe.
This response is a great example of something I see a lot. PLEASE don't take my comments personally or like I'm picking on you. You words just really highlight something I have noticed with many people over the years.
You begin by saying "I'm old school". I have yet to see this phrase mean anything other than "I'm not very bright, and have real difficulty learning things. I am attached to my ways no matter how flawed or illogical they are". I've heard the phrase MANY times, and 100% of those times, this is exactly what it boiled down to. (Poolguy I don't know you at all in person, so this *general* assessment may be way off base as pertains to you personally)
THIS is illogical: saying that people won't want to play if you don't give them a shot, and then immediately saying "you can't play a great player safe". The conclusion is this: Either you are playing with people who are NOT great players...or you ARE leaving them a shot.
I think that MAYBE you are attempting to convey the idea that if you are playing with bangers who don't really know how to play, that you should give them a shot, but that if you are playing a "great" player, go ahead and take a shot at playing safe, since they will do something with it anyway? Is this where you were trying to go?
In any case, I disagree with all the "anti-safe" posts here. The game is what it is. I don't want to disrespect my opponent, whatever their skill level, by playing a half-assed game against them. I will, as others have suggested, play the shot that gives me the best chance of winning the game, each and every shot I take.
If I am giving a lesson, or just trying to help someone with their game, I will instead often miss on purpose, but create a certain type of difficulty for them, like a cluster, or something that can tax their skills. Then I will show them how to deal with it, break it up, whatever. Or for lower ranked players maybe I'll just miss and leave them ball in hand position and give them a chance to run as many as they can.
However, if ANYONE wants to play against me competitively (and there are many lower ranked players that would take real satisfaction in beating me even one game), I owe it to them to try my best and play every ball the best I can. If they beat me, I want it to really mean something. For example, in APA 8 ball, I was playing a 5. I was playing really badly that night. It got to be hill-hill. I broke and scratched. He made a nice run out down to the 8, and then made an unbelievable cross over long rail bank on the 8. I immediately jumped up and gave the guy a high five!! He was so pumped to win the match, and I was genuinely happy for him. He deserved it. I was not playing my best, but I TRIED my best, and he beat me. It was a well deserved victory for him because although I failed, I tried to win on every ball.
Poolguy4u, sincerely NOT trying to dis you...just offering another perspective on the matter. Hope you see that. Your commentary on my post is of course welcome!
KMRUNOUT