Pool is NOT Declining!

I paraphrased what you wrote according to what it seemed like you were really trying to say. If I got it wrong I apologize as I certainly don't want to put words into your mouth. After reading this post it still sounds like you are more or less saying the same thing though.

To answer some of your points I would like to start off by pointing out that engineering is not a good example IMO. We need good engineering. As you said things would fall apart without that. We don't however need movies or pool or baseball. They could disappear entirely tomorrow and life wouldn't really change in any meaningful way. So yes, the importance of movies, or pool, or art, or baseball is entirely a preference thing.

I also kind of think you have the horse and the cart backwards for what most typically happens, but maybe I'm wrong. They didn't just make up the game of game of baseball one day, and then immediately start a professional baseball league that same day, and then because people saw those great baseball players that is why they started to play the game. No, what happened is people started playing baseball, and more importantly some people started having an interest in watching baseball, and things progressed organically from there to where we are now. The game started with a few neighbors playing in a vacant field, to neighboring streets forming teams to play each other (with perhaps a few friends and family coming to watch), to towns forming teams to play other nearby towns with even more people interested in watching, and so on until you ultimately had the professional league that traveled all over to play with lots of spectators.

Nobody wants to watch pool though. Nobody looks up to great pool players. Great pool players don't attract new players like you think. Heck, even pool players don't want to watch pool. To attract players in the way you are referring to you have to somehow change pool into a game that looks appealing and exciting so that people want to watch and you gain lots of fans, which will then make people look up to the great players and want to be like them and play the same game that they do. I'm not sure what pool would have to change to get there, but I am sure it would have to be drastic changes, and a lot of them, and it probably wouldn't even remotely resemble what we know as pool today.

Yes it's a bit of a catch 22 but for the most part I don't think good players create a strong pool scene as you said. I think a strong pool scene is what attracts and creates good players, and ultimately if the pool scene becomes big enough and strong enough it can create a decent fan base who want to be spectators, and if the fan base continues to get big enough the strong players will finally be somewhat of a draw that might help attract new players and they will finally be part of what solidifies that already strong pool scene. So no, until you are significantly larger and more successful than pool is, I don't think the strong players matter very much at all except to those that were already involved in pool and were already big pool fans. Hope that all made sense, and all IMO of course.

It's really quite simple I think, and yes I know you don't agree, but look, if you just lost every local tennis tournament and high school tennis events in the USA, it would have a huge impact on the entire tennis scene in the USA. The talent would not be nearly as strong, and there would be decreased levels of overall interest.

That's exactly what leagues have done to pool. I'd bet 8 or 9 out of ten people on here who are over 40 would agree that local pool tournaments have decreased while league operations were increasing. That's obviously what has happened all across the country... tournaments are being replaced by leagues.

This is all analogous to there not being any place for teenage tennis players to compete... not high school, not at the local court... nowhere for meaningful competition (which I don't personally think leagues are meaningful competition btw).

I see what you're saying when you brought up the baseball analogy moving from neighborhood to neighborhood, and what I got out of that is I agree, but I think those competitions between neighborhoods would get extremely fierce one day. That is sort of akin to a good tournament. I feel like the pool leagues are just going to leave the game in this limbo state. It may grow a little, but not in the way a sport could in the example you stated about baseball. The very thought of leagues, as far as I'm concered, brings about feelings of socializing, fun and as far as actual skill level go, mediocrity would be the word.

But you're right I am saying the same thing; that leagues will keep pool in a state of malaise in the USA. And i mean it's not going to get back to even where it was say in the 90's again. Yet I could be wrong no doubt.
 
Last edited:
It's really quite simple I think, and yes I know you don't agree, but look, if you just lost every local tennis tournament and high school tennis events in the USA, it would have a huge impact on the entire tennis scene in the USA. The talent would not be nearly as strong, and there would be decreased levels of overall interest.

That's exactly what leagues have done to pool. I'd bet 8 or 9 out of ten people on here who are over 40 would agree that local pool tournaments have decreased while league operations were increasing. That's obviously what has happened all across the country... tournaments are being replaced by leagues.

This is all analogous to there not being any place for teenage tennis players to compete... not high school, not at the local court... nowhere for meaningful competition (which I don't personally think leagues are meaningful competition btw).

I see what you're saying when you brought up the baseball analogy moving from neighborhood to neighborhood, and what I got out of that is I agree, but I think those competitions between neighborhoods would get extremely fierce one day. That is sort of akin to a good tournament. I feel like the pool leagues are just going to leave the game in this limbo state. It may grow a little, but not in the way a sport could in the example you stated about baseball. The very thought of leagues, as far as I'm concered, brings about feelings of socializing, fun and as far as actual skill level go, mediocrity would be the word.

But you're right I am saying the same thing; that leagues will keep pool in a state of malaise in the USA. And i mean it's not going to get back to even where it was say in the 90's again. Yet I could be wrong no doubt.

We probably aren't going to agree and have both made our points so there is no reason for me to repeat the same arguments but I do want to leave you with this food for thought. Just because two things happen at the same time does not mean they are related. I got a flat tire the other day while it was raining, but I don't think the rain caused my flat tire even though they happened at the same time. I think you are making an incorrect leap of logic unless you have some evidence that you haven't shared that coorelates the good players and tournament players and gamblers with leaving pool and the success of leagues other than the fact that they are both happening in the world at the same time.

Again, if you were seeing these strong tournament players and gamblers quitting the tournaments and the gambling to join the leagues instead then I would totally see why you feel that leagues are killing tournament pool and gambling. But that isn't what is happening. Those tournament players and gamblers are just leaving pool--completely. What makes you feel that a league they have nothing to do with is causing them to leave pool? To me it seems obvious that they are leaving for other reasons. The fact that there are successful leagues in an area just doesn't make people quit pool. I mean the leagues didn't make you quit, and why would they? They have nothing to do with you and have no effect on you unless they were pulling in the tournament players and the gamblers which they aren't.
 
I wouldn't want to be a custom cue maker or custom cue dealer in this day and age. Those guys must be getting pretty thin by now and here my fat ass sits typing away at the computer.

Thanks

Kevin
 
That's exactly what leagues have done to pool.
Local pool tournaments have decreased while league operations were increasing.
Tournaments are being replaced by leagues.

Most league players don't want to enter tournaments because that is for real players.

Most real players don't enter into leagues because that is for social players.

One has nothing to do with the other.
 
Most league players don't want to enter tournaments because that is for real players.

Most real players don't enter into leagues because that is for social players.

One has nothing to do with the other.
A great accurate and succinct statement.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
Most league players don't want to enter tournaments because that is for real players.
Most real players don't enter into leagues because that is for social players.
One has nothing to do with the other.
More thoughts from a Noob....

Because leagues are enough for most competitive people, that they do not need to crossover to tournaments.
Before leagues, a very competitive pool person had no choice but to enter into tournaments or go for the action in pool rooms.
Leagues are a less intimidating way to compete without feeling like a Rube.

So.... because leagues now exist, people now have a choice and less people enter tournaments. But not because of the lack of money.
So.... I half agree with the cause/effect.
 
Last edited:
Exposure to John and Jane Q. Public
Dr. Billiards Traveling Trick Shot Show featuring "Venom" in a Shopping Mall near you.
Have sign ups for give away's like coupons for table time, starter cues.

Billiards Rooms that can tolerate noobies need to have.......
Free lessons for beginners.
Free lessons for youth.
Limited free table time for minors 15 & under. During limited hours.
When an Adult is accompanied by a Minor, Half-rate table time. Free for the Minor.
Cue leagues. You get a cue at the start of the league, finish the season and the cue is yours. Quit and you pay for the cue.

Who's paying for all this "free" stuff Bernie?
Jason
 
Who's paying for all this "free" stuff Bernie?
Jason

It's called "seed money".
How else do we "grow" the Billiards Arts, Fred?

Promotions are write-offs.
Minors are the only ones getting anything totally free.
Base the table time on their report cards.
 
Last edited:
It's called "seed money".
How else do we "grow" the Billiards Arts?


LMAO. The entire younger generation already thinks everything should be free. Do you honestly think giving it to them now that they will PAY for it later. You can't be serious.

Pool is already filled with enough cheap @$$ pool players, it doesn't need more.

Open a business and do it then Robinhood
Jason
 
Jason, the Player.

Not to give away other peoples money.
It's not "other people's money".
It's a room owners money or manufacturers money that they use to promote their business.
More customers to buy food and drink. More products to be bought.
Do you really think "table time" is what keeps billiards rooms open?

Again I ask you.....What is your idea?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0961.JPG
    IMG_0961.JPG
    55.8 KB · Views: 119
Last edited:
It's not "other people's money".
It's a room owners money or manufacturers money that they use to promote their business.
More customers to buy food and drink. More products to be bought.
Do you really think "table time" is what keeps billiards rooms open?

Again I ask you.....What is your idea?

I dont care! But the answer isn't to give stuff away. If people want to play, they will.


Pool is dying a litte more every generation, it will not be dead by the time I am.
Jason
 
Back
Top