Sorry my reply was not meant for you. I quoted the wrong post.
Think environment and individual variation, not a racial adaptation.
It is unfair and preposterous to state that a given race has an advantage in particular sporting events.
There are racial adaptions, that provide advantages for a particular group in their environment, think pigmentation that helps balance the production of vitamin D, vs exposure to UV rays, body types - thinner and slighter provides advantages in hot climate, the epicanthal fold which protects the eyes from harsh weather.
To stereotype a race, as Thaiger has alluded to is one step from some of the darkest historical events that have occurred by mankind.
I mean honestly......what inherited traits do Asians have that make them good pool players? It is environmental and sociological support. Heredity and genetics at a racial level have nothing to do with it.
He may have not meant it, but it is a slippery slope that does not take much to slide down, and one that I prefer not to be involved in.
His entire argument is being used IMHO to support that fact that he would prefer not to put in the necessary work to become a better player, because he was not born one. So he has an out.
I believe the opposite, that good players are made, and not born.
I've read where it does matter where a runner is from.
The size and weight especially and the leg configuration.
I have no expertise in this area, but what I've read about it.
Thanks for the info.
Jeff Livingston