Playing a game for money with a friend yesterday. I was left in a safety. Cue was 3” from object ball. Made an amazing shot to pocket the ball and get position. My opponent who was sitting in his chair 8’ away at an angle jumps up and says “that’s a double hit! The cue ball was rolling faster than the object ball!” So he didn’t actually see a double hit, he saw what he believed was the evidence of a double hit based on ball reaction. Now, this isn’t the first time of course that I’ve heard this.
People judge a double hit based on the ball reaction. Personally I think this is wrong and bad for the game. I think there are too many pool room professors who are too fast to call fouls without actually seeing a foul. There are a lot of factors that effect cue ball speed. Generally I never call this kind of foul, just not worth it to provoke the argument. Ultimately I lost that game but won the set. But, still always been a pet peeve of mine.
Any opinions or explanations of calling this foul based on cue reaction?