brianna187 said:.00002
I think there's one too many zeros there...:wink:WilleeCue said:I bet the instrument used to measure that kind of tolerance cost more than the CNC machine.
I do contract calibration work for the nuclear industry and accuracy in test equipment aint cheap!
Craig Fales said:I think there's one too many zeros there...:wink:
.2 2 hundred thousandthssCraig Fales said:I think there's one too many zeros there...:wink:
JoeyInCali said:.2 2 hundred thousandthss2 tenths
.02 2o thousandts or 2 hundredths
.002 2 thousandts
.0002 2 ten thousandths
.00002 2 hundredths ? This is 2 hundred thousandths
I would think a screw machine or cnc lathe/turner would have to make that thing.
Microsoft need to know about this insight.Dave38 said:usually one doesn't announce it until it's fully ready and already tested, and passed.
I am only explaining what I perceive Willie's post to be. no offense to anyone:smile:
Dave
brianna187 said:we will have to go soon thanks ...lee
Duh!wildbill9ball said:Originally Posted by JoeyInCali
.2 2 hundred thousandthss2 tenths200 THOUSANDTHS
.02 2o thousandths or 2 hundredths20 THOUSANDTHS
.002 2 thousandths
.0002 2 ten thousandthsOR 2 TENTHS
.00002 2 hundredths ? This is 2 hundred thousandthsAND THIS IS 20 MILLIONTHS
THAT IS HOW A MACHINST WOULD READ IT