Im no Gold Crown expert but that looks like a Gold Crown 1.
Im no Gold Crown expert but that looks like a Gold Crown 1.
I am, and it's a 2. Which is MUCHO better than a 3.
Dale(maybe not quite an expert)
Gold Crown 1, there's no extruded aluminum holding the ball tray to the end rail, no dowel separating the balls in the ball tray, it's a block of wood.
Two words, apron skirts. (or whatever they are called)
Plus, the pedestal looks to be tangerine - if the OP wouldn't mind removing the rails and
showing a pic of the bottoms one could determine in 2 microseconds.
FWIW - rebuilt is a term that allows for much variation - but pre-rebuilt IIs were
much better than IIIs
Dale
Gold Crown 1, there's no extruded aluminum holding the ball tray to the end rail, no dowel separating the balls in the ball tray, it's a block of wood.
Two words, apron skirts. (or whatever they are called)
Plus, the pedestal looks to be tangerine - if the OP wouldn't mind removing the rails and
showing a pic of the bottoms one could determine in 2 microseconds.
FWIW - rebuilt is a term that allows for much variation - but pre-rebuilt IIs were
much better than IIIs
Dale
GC1, you can tell by figure 8 rail hold downs.
But it has the segmented skirt hangers which should make it a GCII, what gives Glen, mix and match table?
My GCII has captured nut rail hold downs and the segmented skirt hangers which tells me its a GCII, correct?
FWIW my table had been privately owned since it was bought new from Brunswick dealer so everything should
match on mine. GCIs should have 1 long aluminum skirt hangar on each skirt I think.