I've been reading these revo threads with interest as I just recently (about a month into it now) switched to a 12.4mm revo myself.
This whole debate seems to boil down to two arguments:
-Cost and is it a fad or not
-Performance
To the cost/fad objectors out there, who cares what people spend on their hobbies? I went from a crazy expensive cue to a revo that costs much less than the cue I was playing with before. Did the cost of the previous cue make me play better? Nope, and that's not why I bought that cue in the first place. I bought and played with that Southwest because (in no particular order): 1) I could afford it 2) I thought it was a good investment 3) I thought it was pretty and 4) I agreed with the generally held opinion that they "hit" great.
Performance is also being debated and all I can say about that so far is that it does what's advertised, which is reduced (greatly in my opinion) deflection. So much so that it's been difficult for me to adjust, but I'm getting the hang of it. Also, and this is a performance criteria for me, the material is hard and very difficult to ding compared to wood. Believe it or not, that's the main reason I switched and in that regard, I'm 100% satisfied. I've had a few "oh shit" moments where the shaft has hit the edge of the light or table and I winced but when I checked the shaft for a ding, it's still perfect. I can't tell you for sure that it's impossible to ding but it's definitely ding proof in normal conditions. Can't say that about any kind of wood shaft.
Before people start minimizing the "ding" issue, I get it, it's not a big deal to most of you. It's a big deal to me. I hate them and hated taking time to remove them myself or having to pay someone else to remove them. Now I don't have to worry about that anymore, ever.
This whole debate seems to boil down to two arguments:
-Cost and is it a fad or not
-Performance
To the cost/fad objectors out there, who cares what people spend on their hobbies? I went from a crazy expensive cue to a revo that costs much less than the cue I was playing with before. Did the cost of the previous cue make me play better? Nope, and that's not why I bought that cue in the first place. I bought and played with that Southwest because (in no particular order): 1) I could afford it 2) I thought it was a good investment 3) I thought it was pretty and 4) I agreed with the generally held opinion that they "hit" great.
Performance is also being debated and all I can say about that so far is that it does what's advertised, which is reduced (greatly in my opinion) deflection. So much so that it's been difficult for me to adjust, but I'm getting the hang of it. Also, and this is a performance criteria for me, the material is hard and very difficult to ding compared to wood. Believe it or not, that's the main reason I switched and in that regard, I'm 100% satisfied. I've had a few "oh shit" moments where the shaft has hit the edge of the light or table and I winced but when I checked the shaft for a ding, it's still perfect. I can't tell you for sure that it's impossible to ding but it's definitely ding proof in normal conditions. Can't say that about any kind of wood shaft.
Before people start minimizing the "ding" issue, I get it, it's not a big deal to most of you. It's a big deal to me. I hate them and hated taking time to remove them myself or having to pay someone else to remove them. Now I don't have to worry about that anymore, ever.