Rodney Morris Hall of fame??

Rodney also won the US Open 10 ball when it had a very tough international field- coming from several games back against Orcullo in the finals.
 
I’m sure the original poster would agree with you. 😀


Best or Greatness IMHO is measured in dollar & cents. That is why the NFL & other sports pansy the best of the best well. Because they sell tickets, and fill spectator seats with paying customers.
 
Well I will add. I just like Rodney. He is a funny gregarious guy.. Great pool player as well...
Not sure that is enough to get him in the hall but what the hell...
 
I was searching current and all time BCA hall of fame members,and I happen to see Rodney Morris. I don’t mean To take anything away from him, but how does he qualify when his only major accomplishment is one US- open win?

Character and reputation play no part in pool so every one with a cue in their hand and chalk in their back pocket is eligible.
 
The whole BCA Hall things seems to have become too political, why was Parica denied entrance for so long?
Tough to answer this because "have become too political" doesn't really mean anything. I can't speak to before 2007, but with the USBMA, it's not like we have meetings, even in private, to try to deny any inclusion. Why did it take Parica so long? Bad timing. Same with Kim Davenport. Every inductee deserved inclusion, so just by the shear number of deserving players tends to have voters leave some players off for a while. I think that's where people get blinders on: there are so many top players in the 70's/80's that deserved to be in. Once these players hit 60, they go into the Veterans Category, which unfortunately if there are more than one deserving player, it's even tougher to get in since only one Veterans goes in every other year. Consider the list I put on the other thread. There are so many good players that deserve automatic induction (again, IMO). People are going to keep some off their list rather than just put everyone down like I do.

I think of other players on the edge that I don't think should be automatics, IMO, but I'm also surprised they aren't discussed more. Players like Jim Mataya (multiple World Championships, World All-Around), Jim Reid (US Open and many titles), Wade Crane (Player of the Year, Perfect 1.000, etc.). Compared to these other three, Parica didn't have to wait that long.
 
Last edited:
Tough to answer this because "have become too political" doesn't really mean anything. I can't speak to before 2007, but with the USBMA, it's not like we have meetings, even in private, to try to deny any inclusion. Why did it take Parica so long? Bad timing. Same with Kim Davenport. Every inductee deserved inclusion, so just by the shear number of deserving players tends to have voters leave some players off for a while. I think that's where people get blinders on: there are so many top players in the 70's/80's that deserved to be in. Once these players hit 60, they go into the Veterans Category, which unfortunately if there are more than one deserving player, it's even tougher to get in since only one Veterans goes in every other year. Consider the list I put on the other thread. There are so many good players that deserve automatic induction (again, IMO). People are going to keep some off their list rather than just put everyone down like I do.

I think of other players on the edge that I don't think should be automatics, IMO, but I'm also surprised they aren't discussed more. Players like Jim Mataya (multiple World Championships, World All-Around), Jim Reid (US Open and many titles), Wade Crane (Player of the Year, Perfect 1.000, etc.). Compared to these other three, Parica didn't have to wait that long.
Mataya's two 'World' champs. are kinda 'World' in name only. In '71 there was no real 'World 9ball Championship' and his '72 'World All-Around'(also won the 9b division) was the all-around at the Stardust Jansco tournament. Great player no doubt but its kinda hard to compare those wins to true WC-level events.
 
Mataya's two 'World' champs. are kinda 'World' in name only. In '71 there was no real 'World 9ball Championship' and his '72 'World All-Around'(also won the 9b division) was the all-around at the Stardust Jansco tournament. Great player no doubt but its kinda hard to compare those wins to true WC-level events.
That reasoning might eliminate other non-sanctioned world championship winners of that and earlier eras as well. That doesn't sound right either. But, as I said, he's not an automatic by any stretch. He'd be in the Veterans Category, and he gets brought up at the Veterans Committee voting.
 
I was searching current and all time BCA hall of fame members,and I happen to see Rodney Morris. I don’t mean To take anything away from him, but how does he qualify when his only major accomplishment is one US- open win?
St. Louie Louie Roberts and Keith McCready also belong.
 
Nothing to do with Rodney specifically, but, Let's face it, MC appearances shouldn't hold much weight as it's always been a good ol boys club.
 
I'd say that his eight Mosconi Cup appearances confirm that he was one of the most elite American players for many years. He's deserving.

Yeah, just like you have mentioned before, many of the past greats and legends of the game may not have ever won a Major championship, but I bet that many of them still got inducted into the Hall of Fame.
 
I agree. When he won the Open he beat the person everyone on here calls the GOAT. He was one of the best rotation players of his era.

Yeah, and I read that he went over to Taiwan, and challenged many of their top players, and came home with a boat load of money that he won off of them.
 
Nothing to do with Rodney specifically, but, Let's face it, MC appearances shouldn't hold much weight as it's always been a good ol boys club.
There are some exceptions, but generally you don’t get invited to the MC unless you are considered among the current top 5 or certainly the top 10 players in the US or Europe. To have participated in the MC 10 times as Rodney has, just 1 behind Cory Deuel’s 11 appearances, is clearly a HOF worthy player, in both cases.
 
I understand your point. Some examples of borderline Hall of Famers in my opinion would be among the women. Why Jeanette Lee has made it but Vivian Villarreal has not makes no sense when you compare their career tournament records.

Jeanette has won virtually nothing in the past 25 years since Allison Fisher and Karen Corr appeared on the scene, whereas Vivian remained a major WPBA tournament threat to both of them for another 10-15 years. I would bet the heads up WPBA match records between Vivian and Jeanette fall strongly in Vivian’s favor.

I have no problem with Jeanette being in the Hall of Fame for her huge influence in promoting the game, but I sure hope Vivian will soon get her long overdue HOF recognition as well.

They look at a players Character more then anything I think, and I do not think that Vivian is deserving for that reason alone, because I do not think she is a good person. That is also a reason why a player like Dennis Orcullo may never be a Hall of Famer, because he has done some things that the Hall of Fame would surely look down on, if they were aware. Getting into the Hall of Fame is not just about great accomplishments in the sport.
 
On Rodney's behalf him and Earl were the no.1 US team for at least 5 years winning Major team titles across the world. The more I think about it I believe Rodney deserves the invite.
 
There are some exceptions, but generally you don’t get invited to the MC unless you are considered among the current top 5 or certainly the top 10 players in the US or Europe. To have participated in the MC 10 times as Rodney has, just 1 behind Cory Deuel’s 11 appearances, is clearly a HOF worthy player, in both cases.
Many have argued that Corey shouldn't have been in a few lately, sadly, there just isn't anybody better to pick. If the good Corey would show up for the Cup it's a no-brainer.
 
Hall of Fame discussion across the board has become very weird in the last decade or so. Looks at baseball as a perfect example with inducting Harold Baines, a player who should not even be there. Mike Mussina got in but I can't think of anyone who thinks he is a hall of famer. The NFL puts everyone in. Same with basketball.

Pool is a weird game because everyone wants to put in players who majorly are known as top gamblers. I feel sometimes fans of this sport put more weight on that than actual titles.

A hall of fame should be for players who are considered the immortals of the game. Players who have/had a presence. That's why the committee was smart to put Danny Barouty in under the Contributors Wing. Even Danny would tell you he's not a HoF player. As for Rodney Morris? Great player, fun guy and represented the game very well, but not a HoF in my eyes.

Great discussion by the way. I can chat for hours regarding this topic.
 
Back
Top