Gromulan - LOL you are a trip. I man not agree with everythging you say but I like the way you say it. =)~
gromulan said:Sounds interesting, but 100K is just a little bit more than I actually have. What are you going to do, call Ronnie on his cell and get him to fly over? (Tell him when you talk to him that I saw him cough off that match to JH and that he's a wank.)
Who?
What Kelly Fisher knows about nine ball you could write on the head of a pin and still leave room for the Lord's prayer. Efren could give Ronnie the six and the last four and not even break a sweat.
gromulan said:It's impossibly difficult for both sides. There are simply too many good players who know each game inside out for any newcomer to have much of a chance. It's possible in the ladies' game because the fields are so thin and the standard is quite a bit lower. In the men's game it's far different animal, though, with such talent bases on both sides of the Atlantic who knows, it may happen one day.
If Ronnie or any top snooker player like Hendry or Higgins had grown up playing games like nine ball or one pocket in the US, against the top competition, then I have no doubt that they would be top players here as well. They simply have too much talent. The same goes in the reverse, if Archer or Strickland or Buddy Hall had grown up in the UK they would be top snooker players.
For either transition, it would take several years of development. I actually feel like the pool players would have a better chance because their overall billiard knowledge is much greater than the average snooker player's and because they would not have the handicap of having to develop a huge break.
saw him in London, he is a monster9 ball said:I am telling you folks watch out for him when he plays in the next ipt tournament because he will be dangerous
ok well heres my 1 cents worth it depends on the pro player. i mean i watched snooker and i dont think its all that difficult cause there is not a whole lot to it . the thing that an american player would have to adjust to is smaller balls and because of the smaller balls a totaly different stick. but not table size cause thats automatic if thats all you play on.onepocketchump said:A lot of what you say is true Mark. Let me ask you this since you are probably the greatest player, and I mean that in the absolute world class speed sense, who posts here in the main forum regularly (and Keither of course). Do you think that there is any American player who could go to England and seriously challenge the Snooker circuit? If so, what would it take for them to do so? Is it easier for the Snooker pros to come here and win than it is for the pool pros to go there and win?
Also, you are right that the balls and cloth are different. What isn't different however is the physics. Ronnie plays snooker like he's playing nine ball. He doesn't shoot all his shots with no spin. He spins his rock for position just like nine-ball players do it. It's amazing to watch. And if he shoots all the balls in the corner pockets just remember that most of those shots are four feet or better into tough pockets that reject anything that touches the cushion on the way in.
John
onepocketchump said:I don't need to check. Would you be willing to give Ronnie the 7 in a race to 21 for $100,000?
By the way I have seen Torbjorn Blomdahl ply 9-ball. He used to play down the road from me when I lived in Germany.
I don't know who you are but I would be willing to bet millions that you won't put up your own money trying to give Ronnie the 7 ball.
I guarantee you that Darren Appleton, Raj Hundal, Daryl Peach and NONE of the UK 9-Ballers want to give Ronnie the 7 or ANY WEIGHT if they are going to have to play on their own money.
Any fool can throw away a backer's money. Let's see what you or any other player will do with your own money and THEN we can see how confident you are in your statements.
I play with Kelly Fisher and she is one of the greatest players alive. She echoes most everyone's sentiments here that Ronnie O'Sullivan is inhuman when it comes to pocket billiards. Kelly's opinion of a player's speed is something you can take to the bank.
John
She will be if she isn't quite yet. If we're going to talk about the three greatest female snooker players, she's one of them. A champion is a champion. And she, like Karen, has shown that she is willing to do what it takes to become THE champion in American pool as well.cuetechasaurus said:I've never seen Kelly play. Is she up there on Allison and Karen's level? If so, does she play in alot of the tournaments they do, and how does she do?
Double-Dave said:I've watched Ronnie play some pool live, and I was disappointed. He clearly has to work on his pool-game if he's to become a force in the IPT. His break particularly was (early this year) pretty weak, and his cueball was no more than average. However, I've watched Ronnie play snooker on the telly for dozens of hours being flabbergasted by his enormous talents and it can only be a matter of time before he can adept his shotmaking skills. Whether or not you can quickly develop a powerful break is another matter. I posted some vids of Ronnie playing pool a while back if anyone's interested, nothing too fancy though. If he would have played a world beater at that time (he did, lost to Immonen) I would have made a 5-1 outsider in a race to 9.
gr. Dave
Double-Dave said:I posted some vids of Ronnie playing pool a while back if anyone's interested, nothing too fancy though.
Cornerman said:She will be if she isn't quite yet. If we're going to talk about the three greatest female snooker players, she's one of them. A champion is a champion. And she, like Karen, has shown that she is willing to do what it takes to become THE champion in American pool as well.
Fred
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=25316shanesinnott said:Dave,
Do you still have these or a link to them? I would love to see them.
Thanks in advance.
lewdo26 said:Too complicated. I couldn't open the files with either Real Player or Windows Media Player. Gosh, I really wanted to see it. Why can't anything be easy?