Review of SEE System
What follows is a detailed review of my experiences with the SEE system so far. Will be a little long I think, but I'll try my best…
Background - been using Pro1 for the last year and a half, recently upgraded to Ekkes's new material, didn't spend much time with the old system since I was in the middle of learning and working with Pro1. I got the new SEE system in late August, and started playing with it at the table in late August / early September, so about 6 - 7 weeks ago.
The system contains a lot of material. Nearly 200 full pages of documentation with pictures and containing 5 - 6 hours of embedded videos explaining and demonstrating every detail. Shows all 3 categories of shots, all necessary adjustments, how to compensate for throw, how to adjust for english, banking, cue ball return paths, and more.
So far I'm very happy with the SEE system and have been using it full time, with a little Pro1 sprinkled in. Even though using the shadows on the balls may seem strange, turns out they are in very consistent positions, even with different lighting, and the advantage for me over Pro1 is simply the alignment. Everything uses discrete points on the balls - shadow, center, edge. With Pro1, while I got pretty good at it, I was always a little fuzzy picking up the A/C alignments, wasn't as clear to find the 1/4 point on the object ball. Now for similar shots I'm able to aim at a line between 2 discrete points which for me seems to cement the aim a little better. I can still make the same shots with Pro1, and oddly enough when in position with SEE I can actually "see" the CTE and secondary aim lines for Pro1 as well. The initial alignment though with SEE just makes me a little more confident over the shot.
The process is similar to Pro1 - you build your preshot routine around lining up the shot and stepping in a certain way, which rotates your body into different positions based on the angle of the shot and seems to auto-magically put you in the right alignment to make the shot. Doesn't seem like a very good candidate for a mathematically proven system, but much like Pro1, 90/90, etc., I think it's all about visual intelligence and letting your eyes lead your body into the right alignment. You could call these alignment systems just as easily as aiming systems, either way they can be very repeatable and really up your confidence, especially on difficult shots.
The shot transitions are different, which took a bit of getting used to. Shots I shot in Pro1 with the first category of shots (A/C alignment) can now be category 2 with SEE, but that came with time. There is more complexity with SEE, as Ekkes has adjustments for distance, speed, spin, etc. However, that's also a positive - once you learn the adjustments, you will no longer miss a shot that you have lined up perfectly to center pocket but shoot with a slow speed, or a lot of distance, or even with sidespin, the line corrections handle all of this seamlessly with a bit of training.
The only negative for me at this point is the category 3 shots, between 55 and 75 degrees. They require more of a pivoting move and some slightly different alignment steps, and for me thus far it has been a little inconsistent. I can make them just fine in reference positions, but when I free form it on the table it's not as automatic. I feel less systematic over these shots and definitely using more feel and experience to make them. I have not put as much time in on these, instead focusing on the bread and butter 0 - 50 degree shots, and if I had to make one in an important game I would resort to my Pro1 alignment. But Ekkes has been great in the correspondence we've had, and I'm sure with his help and more review and time at the table those shots will become as deadly as the rest.
I could go on, and would be happy (along with Ekkes I'm sure) to answer any individual questions. The material is definitely worth the money and the study, especially if you are familiar with aiming systems in general you should pick it up very easily. The knowledge along is worth the money. I plan to get Ron's new materials even though I may not switch everything to 90/90, just so I can fully understand his system instead of the overview understand I have now.
I've already showed the basics of SEE to a few people locally and they were astounded. My shot making is equal or slightly above where I was with Pro1 and that's with only 6 weeks invested, I'm still ingraining some of the adjustments and training my body to be in the right positions. But one advantage for me at least is I'm shooting long shots and using spin even better than I was before since I just tweak my starting position and am not even having to use BHE or any conscious feel to compensate for various effects. I think Pro1 is great for these shots as well, I just found that my eyesight and perception was letting me down the farther the object ball was from the cue ball, and looking at a more discrete line has helped with my confidence on these shots.
Scott