TXsouthpaw said:i wonder why no ones ever tried selling something like that for home use?
Cost? It would put an end to all the non level tables of the world.
jason said:I'm sure cost is the main factor. It might be worth it for some Californian since they get quite a few tremors.![]()
TXsouthpaw said:it would be awesome though. Forget all the arguments about which table levels the easiest. How about one that levels itself.![]()
Aparently it is at sea and some one is playing on the other table in the background.smoooothstroke said:Not very practical IMO,unless it has some very advanced (expensive) enginering.
"cool" idea but likely not up to playabilty standards,at least when aboard a ship at sea.
JohnnyOzone said:The table in the background isn't moving around like the one in the foreground, and people are playing on it, and the balls aren't rolling around all over the table.
I call shenanigans.
I wondered about that, too. You could steer a rolling ball by pushing the corners down. Might make an interesting game, but it wouldn't be pool.DogsPlayingPool said:I would note though that just because it levels itself to the "horizon" doesn't mean the bed itself is level. Also, I wonder if it would move any time you put any weight on it like with your bridge hand, or leaning on it to reach a shot, in which case it would not be level when you are actually taking the shot.
It is interesting that the guys in the background did not choose to play on that table. I wonder why.