Seriously CSI? Forfeits bring losers back?

The way multi-stage tournaments work is that qualifiers are guaranteed x number of spots in the final brackets of a tournament. In this case, there were 4 qualifiers guaranteed for the final single-elimination round. It doesn't make any sense, when a qualifier forfeits, to put a bye in the final stage of the tournament. You fill the final brackets with the qualifiers.

:thumbup: 100% Agreed
 
Nobody got screwed, nobody made a bad decision, the procedure for a tournament like this was correctly handled.

If anyone took a screwing, it was Ralf for not being able to play. He might have been the favorite going into the final match.

Once again, the proper way to handle this type of event, where the leading player cannot continue, is to let the next highest ranked player take his place.

They made the right call PERIOD.
 
Unless I'm mistaken, during last month's world nine ball championships in Doha, three "eliminated" competitors were brought back to compete when the previously qualified players dropped out or failed to show.

Those players were Chua, Kiamco, and Faraon.

You madea bad example
In the world championship qualifier everthing was pre-defined. Players earned points in each qualification, they had the qualified players and a ranking after the 3 qualifications for a "waiting list", that's how Chua, Kiamco and Faraon got in the Main Event, because they were topping in the waiting list and there were 3 players forfeit. The system was clear and fair.
 
You madea bad example
In the world championship qualifier everthing was pre-defined. Players earned points in each qualification, they had the qualified players and a ranking after the 3 qualifications for a "waiting list", that's how Chua, Kiamco and Faraon got in the Main Event, because they were topping in the waiting list and there were 3 players forfeit. The system was clear and fair.

Hmm, that sounds like a good example to me. What they wouldn't have done in the World 9-ball tournament is leave a hole in the final bracket. There were no byes because they had a bunch of potential qualifiers to fill the brackets.

This was a smaller tournament obviously, but it would make just as little sense for CSI to cancel half of the semi finals of the final bracket, when they've got ranked qualifiers waiting in the wings.
 
Hmm, that sounds like a good example to me. What they wouldn't have done in the World 9-ball tournament is leave a hole in the final bracket. There were no byes because they had a bunch of potential qualifiers to fill the brackets.

This was a smaller tournament obviously, but it would make just as little sense for CSI to cancel half of the semi finals of the final bracket, when they've got ranked qualifiers waiting in the wings.

Except for the little fact that the ranked qualifiers were already knocked out, oops.
 
Nobody got screwed, nobody made a bad decision, the procedure for a tournament like this was correctly handled.

If anyone took a screwing, it was Ralf for not being able to play. He might have been the favorite going into the final match.

Once again, the proper way to handle this type of event, where the leading player cannot continue, is to let the next highest ranked player take his place.

They made the right call PERIOD.

BS the player was already knocked out of the tournament. What they did was unfair
and completely out of line. The code of conduct guys, right. The old do what I say, not what I do. lol
 
I can't believe this happened. I paid $400 for a VIP seat to watch the best players in the world play in a fair tournament in Las Vegas. True, I left after the 10-ball event because watching world class players play 8-ball is a travesty since they will either run out or be snookered on the break and the other guy will run out but integrity is integrity and this is smelling mighty foul.

If American players suck so badly that they can't beat these Chinese guys fair and square then that's just the way it is. Don't keep shoving Van Boening back in there until he finally beats the guy and then claim superiority. Ko should have played his brother if Ralph had to bail. One has to ask why sign up for a tournament you can't finish. The tournament isn't running behind schedule the finals were always scheduled to happen at 7pm. If your flight is at 7pm doesn't that mean that you're never going to be able to play in the finals and that this problem was know from the start. If this was known from the start and today both Ralph and Thorsten had to leave why not start today's matches at 9:00AM instead of 11:00AM. That would have given Ralph and Thorsten plenty of time to get to the airport.

Pool sucks in America and this just makes it suck that much worse. Unbelievable.

yes, I don't understand why Ralf made flight reservations like that. perhaps he didn't know about the times of the matches ahead of time
 
some people keep bringing up shane was 2nd in he bracket.since Ralf fortified he should play.which i dont think is right ppl look up the word (fortified)..lol .. in realty if i was going to bring in a backup player i would look at who finish 2nd in all brackets combined..that would be who i would have brought in.i dont who that was.does anyone know??
 
Last edited:
some people keep bringing up shane was 2nd in he bracket.since Ralf fortified he should play.which i dont think is right ppl look up the word (fortified)..lol .. in realty if i was going to bring in a backup player i would look at who finish 2nd in all brackets combined..that would be who i would have brought in.i dont who that was.does anyone know??

The winner of each group was suppose to advance. The WINNER of each group.
 
The winner of each group was suppose to advance. The WINNER of each group.

i understand that sir and i agree big ko should have been in the finals.im just asking who was 2nd in the alround groups/games won and lose
 
Last edited:
i understand that sir and i agree big ko should have been in the finals.im just asking who was 2nd in the alround groups

There wasn't an all around group though and since they played different players the records can't be compared to determine a clear cut overall second. Not that second mattered anyway.

I probably should not have quoted you because my statement was really directed to everyone. The rules were clear. The winner from each group advances. Once the winners were determined that should have been that and a forfeit is a forfeit.
 
Last edited:
There wasn't an all around group though and since they played different players the records can't be compared to determine a clear cut overall second. I probably should not have quoted you because my statement was really directed to everyone. The rules were clear winner from each group moves on. Once the winners were determined that should have been that and a forfeit is a forfeit.



im just asking if it was a way to figure it out who was the runner up ? might be hard to figure with games played by difference groups dont know
 
Guess none of you Keyboard cowboys are familiar with professional drag racing... If the winner or a round cannot make the next round the loser advances instead....

lol, what a ridiculous thing to use as a standard.

I think this is poor on CSI's part. It's unfair on both of the Ko's and looks unprofessional.
 
Well since you have admitted to the being the lowest D player on Az I guess I should bow to your lack of a clue but that aint gonna happen......

The dbl elimination tournament is by far worse than a round robin.. Luck of the draw since most are not seeded could have someone playing 1-2 world beaters while someone else goes thru a death bracket with all world class players. Sure there may be collusion in a round robin by players if someone is eliminated already and playing someone who can advance but heyyy Ralf won so so much for the invited pros having the character you are projecting on them.. If Ralf had dumped and jumped on a plane and CSI had found out about it... Ralf would not ever be asked back...

Thats what the invitational is about.. You create a set of pros that act with character and class and you can maybe drag pool back into the sunlight..

If the pros aren't dumping and the interest rises then maybe just maybe you will be able to book bets on professional matches again at the live betting windows.. That will be a step back to legitimacy......

We do invitational round robins at the Accu-Stats Arena several times a year.... And the guys are there to play... Every game of every match... These are world class players... Champions... They are not your local hero at the bar that will lay down trying to make a score... They bring it and keep bringing it which is what makes them champions... You think they need skin in the game to play? You have no and I mean NO clue as to what makes them who they are......

Chris

Nobody plays their best in a round robin when they are out of the money. If you advance people based on wins or margins of victory, then deals will be made and dumping will begin.

I ain't no D player son. Stick to what you know best...making 2nd rate tips and homemade chalk. You should be very proud.
 
Maybe it's time for Ozzy to come on here and earn those big spokesmodel bucks.

On the surface I think it looks bad but would like to hear the "official" explanation.

Lou Figueroa
 
When people lose in the BCAPL nationals and the guy who beats them ends up sleeping in on their next match can the loser just jump back in and get back in the event?

This was a completely brutal decision and it made no sense. SVB is playing a freeroll with no pressure. Ko was preparing to play Souquet and at the last second you throw SVB on the table as his new opponent?

How the heck could you possibly see this as the fair and correct action? Seriously? This is completely unprofessional and completely unfair to those that made it to the semi finals by WINNING their brackets.

You just tainted your whole event, way to go.
I'd like to know why Ralf had to suddenly leave for China and forfeit. He beat Dennis in his first match on Wednesday morning and should have have played in the finals later that day, but all of a sudden he has to go catch a plane. It's hard to believe that he would schedule a flight on the last day of a CSI tournament that he had a good chance of winning - I smell a rat.
 
"I'd like to know why Ralf had to suddenly leave for China and forfeit. He beat Dennis in his first match on Wednesday morning and should have have played in the finals later that day, but all of a sudden he has to go catch a plane. It's hard to believe that he would schedule a flight on the last day of a CSI tournament that he had a good chance of winning - I smell a rat. " - jmelvin23

I have to agree there is more here than has surfaced - What's the real deal with Ralf? What is being said about catching a plane simply does not add up.

Anyway, this was an invitational not a real tournament. I think this is an important distinction, not that it is justification for what happened, but how seriously can a closed contest be taken?

As far as I'm concerned an Invitational = exhibition.

It's just a show, an exercise in making money through entertainment. It is not a legit sporting contest in my opinion.

Players who participate in these events should be simply paid a flat fee for showing up, and let the show begin.

That's my two cents.
 
"I'd like to know why Ralf had to suddenly leave for China and forfeit. He beat Dennis in his first match on Wednesday morning and should have have played in the finals later that day, but all of a sudden he has to go catch a plane. It's hard to believe that he would schedule a flight on the last day of a CSI tournament that he had a good chance of winning - I smell a rat. " - jmelvin23

I have to agree there is more here than has surfaced - What's the real deal with Ralf? What is being said about catching a plane simply does not add up.

Anyway, this was an invitational not a real tournament. I think this is an important distinction, not that it is justification for what happened, but how seriously can a closed contest be taken?

As far as I'm concerned an Invitational = exhibition.

It's just a show, an exercise in making money through entertainment. It is not a legit sporting contest in my opinion.

Players who participate in these events should be simply paid a flat fee for showing up, and let the show begin.

That's my two cents.
Eaxactly. How does this model save pro pool? It doesnt. Makes it into a traveling circus where only the ring masters make money.

They pissed off China and v 75 percent of their paying public. So that's a billion Chinese and 400 hard core pool sweaters. Brilliant.
 
"I'd like to know why Ralf had to suddenly leave for China and forfeit. He beat Dennis in his first match on Wednesday morning and should have have played in the finals later that day, but all of a sudden he has to go catch a plane. It's hard to believe that he would schedule a flight on the last day of a CSI tournament that he had a good chance of winning - I smell a rat. " - jmelvin23

I have to agree there is more here than has surfaced - What's the real deal with Ralf? What is being said about catching a plane simply does not add up.

Anyway, this was an invitational not a real tournament. I think this is an important distinction, not that it is justification for what happened, but how seriously can a closed contest be taken?

As far as I'm concerned an Invitational = exhibition.

It's just a show, an exercise in making money through entertainment. It is not a legit sporting contest in my opinion.

Players who participate in these events should be simply paid a flat fee for showing up, and let the show begin.

That's my two cents.

I can understand Ralf needing to get out of Dodge.

It's like 18-20 hours to Beijing and a 15 hour time zone difference with the Team event starting Monday. There would also be the issue of connections and convenience and cost. He would need to get acclimated to the time change, recover from the long flight, and get practice in on the equipment there. And there could be any other number of reasons why he booked it the way he did. Maybe he just did't feel that he was in top form and would have been out by that time in the tournament anyway. Maybe he felt it was important to get to China in time to make a good showing and not let his teammates down. Who knows.

However, if it was that close he probably shouldn't have been invited in the first place and perhaps CSI would like to look at the issue of player forfeits in the future as in: you do it you don't get invited back.

Lou Figueroa
 
Back
Top