Wasn't the winner of every set the same with the spot as without?
Without the spot, Sets 2-4 would not have been over in a race to 30.
Wasn't the winner of every set the same with the spot as without?
Wasn't the winner of every set the same with the spot as without?
Set 1 -- 27-30, 24-30 without spot
Set 2 -- 30-25. 27-25 without spot
Set 3 -- 30-21, 27-21 without spot
Set 4 -- 30-26, 27-26 without spot
Total -- 117-102, 105-102 without spot
We don't know who would have won sets 2-4 without the spot.
Oh I get you. Whenever the person with the spot wins, it wouldn't have been over without the spot. But when Corey did win, it was by more than 3.Without the spot, Sets 2-4 would not have been over in a race to 30.
Oh I get you. Whenever the person with the spot wins, it wouldn't have been over without the spot. But when Corey did win, it was by more than 3.
3 ahead after 207 games isn't much but just watching it sure felt like a much wider margin because Corey was closing out sets winning 2 games to every 1 game for Justin. Justin. Continually covered the spot and took large leads early in sets then Corey closed out with a vengeance. The actual ebb and flow of the match didn't match the final score. Anybody who watched knows the way Corey closed the 2nd and 3rd set was what defined the match. He limped to the finish line in the 4th set but honestly the fact it was a new day the same trend followed and Justin started fast. Final score doesnt mean much in this one....if they play again my money is going in the same way.
I'm curious what the money was in the Bustamante vs Chohan and Deuel vs Bergman match.
I believe 10K in the middle for the 1p
Deuel vs Berg was 20K each + 8K added(by room owner). It might've gone up some at match time.
I read that Chris Bartram was backing Corey.
I believe 10K in the middle for the 1p
Deuel vs Berg was 20K each + 8K added(by room owner). It might've gone up some at match time.
I read that Chris Bartram was backing Corey.