It was fun to catch up and sweat the finals with you Stu!
I agree with your write up.
I would prefer they use a shot clock earlier and allow races to 9 on both sides. Race to 8 on the loser's side is very short against good players in a tournament that traditionally has always been to 11. The US Open ran 11 for many years without scheduling problems so I don't know why it needs to be trimmed to 9, but if it does then going even shorter was hard to take. Hard to fly out and take a week off and have such limited opportunity at the table.
Other than quicker play and longer sets I felt it was perfect. And those are just my preferences as a player.
As for what went well, I feel the break rules are the best I've ever seen in a 9 ball tournament. The breaker still maintained an advantage and there were ample run outs from the break. However the players had to break firmly with a difficult to control cut break, one that had a small margin of error on the strike and also introduced quite a bit of unpredictability. Watching last year's players pop in the wing ball and float the one 1 rail in front of the corner repeatedly made the matches almost unwatchable to me. Knowing each break was going to have a lot of moving parts outside of the players' control made the matches some of the most enjoyable I've seen.