Let me share a great statement that I remember hearing when I called the cue tech school in Texas. I cannot remember exactly who it was I spoke with, but he was great to speak with, and answered all of my questions perfectly. I was, and still am very intersted in becoming a certified instructor. Too bad it is a bit too far fro me to conveniently attend so far.
Anyway, I let him know a little about me ( I am an APA 7 eyc, etc,) I was basically saying that I felt I was a fairly accomplished player, but in no way a top tier player, but I was willing to do whatever was neceassry to improve.
His response was classic : " Well. we don't really get any beginners here, they already know everything"
It may not be word for word, but you get what I am saying. I still remember how it struck me as being so true.
Anyway to everybody getting worked up over sombody who has the gall to call themself an instructor while being a very low ranked player, think about this:
I bet ALL of you ( me too ) have helped another player with some aspect of the game along the way to becoming the level of player you are now. You may have had the best of intentions, and tried your best, but were you really qualified to teach it? I bet ALMOST EVERYONE has passed on some bit of knowledge to another without a "real understanding" of it. You parroted something you heard from another without truly having an applicable understanding of it. It the questions from your student got to be too much it usually resorts to " well, it is kinda complicated, but this is the jist of it, I hope that helps" or something to the matter. Have you really done a service to your " student"? You (we) have held ourselves up for at least that moment as a person qualified to teach that topic without feeling the need to be certified or recognoized, or going through any program at all. At least she went to the trouble of LEARNING correctly BEFORE she went on to show sombody else.
At least this person is honest about their level of play, and their taget students. They are tested on the fact that they at least have learned and demonstrated their correct understanding of basic principals of pool. They are not like many others who just parrot things they have heard, or make it up as they go along.
I really do not have any problem thinking that this person IS qualified to introduce new students to the game in a correct and organized manner. She has proven to me at least that she has a passion for this game, and a passion to show it to others. She has proven also that she IS concerned about imparting true and correct information with accepted teaching methods. I am sorry, but that is good enough for me!
Now, that is not to say that I would seek out this person for my personal instruction. I also have a feeling that if I did, she would have no problem refferring me to someone who would be able to help me. I also would NOT be suprised if there was something she could show me that would be of some value.
I have many books on pool. Most of them at least touch on the basics. Everytime I got a new book, I did not skip this section. What was the harm in reviewing something I think I already know? Many times, it would clarify something a little more, or get me to look at something I already know in a new way. Never a bad thing.
I always say " the day you declare you are too good to learn something is the day you prove it to be true"
I guess my REAL point in all of this is : With all of the many "teachers" out there spouting off nonsense who never cared enough to take any instruction or go through a program to learn proper teaching methods, WHY single out one who DID care enough about her students to do everything she could to teach the best she could? It seems the argument can be made that she is more serious about teaching than the guy who can run 5 racks, and is just going to charge you money to fill in the down time between his money game ( with your money).
Just my 2 cents ( okay maybe .75 !)
Jw