There are a lot of 'instructors' selling players on various ideas they claim are magic bullets. There are players that swear by them, and just as many that say they don't work. Perfect Aim, CTE, TOI, Hal Houle's systems come to mind. There are also techniques like slip stroke, back hand english, swooping that have proponents and naysayers. Even respected instructors here have opposing views on many things.
I haven't seen most of these things mentioned in the books I've read, nor have those who have taught me ever mentioned most of them. It seems that all the technical analysis of them proves limited if any usefulness of them. If there is a benefit to them, does it outweigh their problems to make them worthwhile? Are they really that much better than basic methods that have been taught for a hundred years?
Are those selling the ideas simply snake oil salesmen feeding on the never ending desire of players to learn that secret magic bullet that will make them a tough opponent? How does a player figure out what's good and what's bad without wasting a lot of money or a lot of time. and possibly hurting their game?
I haven't seen most of these things mentioned in the books I've read, nor have those who have taught me ever mentioned most of them. It seems that all the technical analysis of them proves limited if any usefulness of them. If there is a benefit to them, does it outweigh their problems to make them worthwhile? Are they really that much better than basic methods that have been taught for a hundred years?
Are those selling the ideas simply snake oil salesmen feeding on the never ending desire of players to learn that secret magic bullet that will make them a tough opponent? How does a player figure out what's good and what's bad without wasting a lot of money or a lot of time. and possibly hurting their game?