Tom
No apology required. My point was that many of the early testers really liked the Oinkers I was objecting to the characterization that they were inferior by a poster that failed to include the simple little data point that he had indeed tested them.
So in his humble opinion they are not as good.
So I sort of owe him an apology but I don't like those on the internet who hide behind a screen name and write things like "I heard those were not good" or "That product is cheaper so it must not be as good as this one.". They are propagating hearsay not truth.
You are one of the good guys on here that has developed a better product and taken good care of those of us that have tried your product out.
Thanks!
Gary
No apology required. My point was that many of the early testers really liked the Oinkers I was objecting to the characterization that they were inferior by a poster that failed to include the simple little data point that he had indeed tested them.
So in his humble opinion they are not as good.
So I sort of owe him an apology but I don't like those on the internet who hide behind a screen name and write things like "I heard those were not good" or "That product is cheaper so it must not be as good as this one.". They are propagating hearsay not truth.
You are one of the good guys on here that has developed a better product and taken good care of those of us that have tried your product out.
Thanks!
Gary